The NSA watches you poop.

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
22,505
29,703
Lets me be honest here. They hate everything we do with military in our country. Imagine the cop thread, now imagine it was literally impossible to do anything about those cops, and then imagine cops were told they had to kill people on purpose.

No shit other countries hate our military and what it does.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
What do you base that off of, though? I can't imagine the sense of detachment would be any different than firing a missile from the cockpit, or firing a gun, or a mortar, etc. Any intermediary you put between you and the killing detaches you somewhat, but I wouldn't think it is cumulative like that.
Like Phazael said, it's the element of risk. if you're putting soldiers' lives in danger, you have to be damn sure there's a good reason to do so. If you're sending unmanned flying killbots, you have nothing to worry about. You can be much more flippant about killing other people if there's no chance any of your guys are gonna get killed in the process.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
You don't think the lives of soldiers are a consideration when deciding to attack other people?
 

tad10

Elisha Dushku
5,533
599
Obama's drone campaign is a massive blunder because it sows hatred and resentment..
I'm pretty sure Torrid and I are on opposite sides of the aisle here, yet I completely agree with him - beyond just the unconstitutionality of using the AUMF to bomb 16-year old kids in Yemen. And yes, I'm well aware Bush started the campaign and is just as responsible, but the fact that Bush started it doesn't absolve Obama from responsibility for expanding it. The effects of the drone campaign is to build grass-roots support for AQ.

If I were a cynical person I might add that the US Government, including the NSA and Obama, are well aware of the fact that using drones is building grass-root support for AQ, and ensuring the continued security state here in the US.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
If I were a cynical person I might add that the US Government, including the NSA and Obama, are well aware of the fact that using drones is building grass-root support for AQ, and ensuring the continued security state here in the US.
Doesn't take much of a stretch of imagination, I agree.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
You don't think the lives of soldiers are a consideration when deciding to attack other people?
I don't think you know the first thing about what soldiers think or experience in the field, how they operate, or how that compares to drone pilots.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
I don't think you know the first thing about what soldiers think or experience in the field, how they operate, or how that compares to drone pilots.
I'm not talking about what the soldiers think or experience. I'm talking about the decision to kill people. It's easier to decide to kill people by sending a drone than by sending soldiers who are putting their lives at risk.

Edit: Sorry, I see you were just referring to the second point whatsisface made. My bad.
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
14,803
32,026
Also, looking at it from the side of the insurgent, the risk of getting turned into a smoldering crater is the same whether it is a drone or a manned aircraft. But it is a lot more demoralizing when they risk life and limb (or suicide attack) against a drone and the only consequence is "a_drone_002" spawning a little later with the same dude at the controls. We literally have the capacity to delete their shit stain of a country completely by remote control without resorting to nukes, until we blow through all our cash doing it. The best part is that if our guy fucks up, he gets to learn and improve instead of us having to retrain a new dude from scratch. Allah Sandyballs is most likely a grease spot if he fucks up. They are living in a war zone, while our guys are essentially playing Xbox with little personal consequence. Never underestimate the demoralizing effect of not ever being able to make the enemy bleed, which is what drone warfare means to the people subjected to it.

From our end, I think anyone ESPECIALLY those with experience in armed conflict would agree that its a lot easier to make the decision to take a human life when you are more removed from the situation. This obviously does not apply to men defending themselves in the field, but I am referring to missions where the specific goal is to eliminate a specific person especially when a high risk of collateral is involved. If you are going in with boots on the ground, chances are those guys are going to not blow away women and children casually and be very clear about confirming their target. Assistant Director Needledick at drone HQ is probably not going to give as much of a shit about those factors, since he is manning a desk back on US soil and his job is all about the numbers and he does not have to see the killing eyeball to eyeball. It's really a basic fact of human nature.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Its actually pretty well documented by this point killing via drone has some pretty adverse affects on the operator.

Edit - looks like in addition to being a Batista, ESL teacher and feminist, Tanoomba is also and expert defense analyst who knows all the protocols for determining the use of deadly force via a drone strike.
 

tad10

Elisha Dushku
5,533
599
But it is a lot more demoralizing when they risk life and limb (or suicide attack) against a drone and the only consequence is "a_drone_002" spawning a little later with the same dude at the controls.
I don't talk day to day with Al-Qaeda leaders (sorry NSA asshole who is following this thread) but I'm going to guess from the fact that we've been drone-bombing them for years and AQ seems as strong as ever that it's not as demoralizing as you think.

When you're 18, living in Yemen, and can't have sex unless you rape a girl and can't do much else - picking up a gun and killing people probably seems like a rational choice.

Instead of sending in drones, we should pay for brothels, that would cut into AQ recruitment.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,039
138,850
It's demoralizing for the civilian population that the taliban is trying to win over, but we lose the wests cultural pull when a bomb kills somebodies cousin or sister ect ect re: collateral damage ( a lot more overall collateral damage happens than they let on because a lot more missions are undertaken even if the rates are slightly lower ), the al qaeda are fanatics willing to suicide themselves so no, it doesn't fundamentally change their attitudes except give them a better recruiting pitch.
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
14,803
32,026
I don't talk day to day with Al-Qaeda leaders (sorry NSA asshole who is following this thread) but I'm going to guess from the fact that we've been drone-bombing them for years and AQ seems as strong as ever that it's not as demoralizing as you think.

When you're 18, living in Yemen, and can't have sex unless you rape a girl and can't do much else - picking up a gun and killing people probably seems like a rational choice.

Instead of sending in drones, we should pay for brothels, that would cut into AQ recruitment.
I don't disagree with this, but really warfare being conducted solely by drones is a relatively new development (as opposed to the drones supplementing existing forces in a specific theatre) and the outrage has gotten pretty intensified since. Its a lot different being able to run in with a bomb strapped to you and gib a bunch of foreigners and collect your 72 virgins, as opposed to getting raped by skynet periodically and having to cross the Atlantic to meaningfully retaliate. Technology has changed a shit ton since the Afghan resistance of the Soviets and while we are not capable of occupying a foreign state effectively (thanks Iraq for proving that), we can basically fuck them up on a near constant basis with drones and other forms of remote ordinance. They could fuck us by sabotaging oil production in the region, but that would put them at odds with the very people financing their bullshit.
 

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Its actually pretty well documented by this point killing via drone has some pretty adverse affects on the operator.

Edit - looks like in addition to being a Batista, ESL teacher and feminist, Tanoomba is also and expert defense analyst who knows all the protocols for determining the use of deadly force via a drone strike.
he just wants to have a civil discussion, bro. talking out of ass is better than thinking twice before typing.
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
27,661
16,106
I like how nothing like this happens in the 6 years of Obama then right after the NSA shit is revealed suddenly we've got the super secret AQ info, thanks to the NSA.
How do you define "like this" so that it doesn't include benghazi or killing obama bin ladden? It's not like terrorists have been quiet for 6 years.
 

tad10

Elisha Dushku
5,533
599
How do you define "like this" so that it doesn't include benghazi or killing obama bin ladden? It's not like terrorists have been quiet for 6 years.
We haven't shut down 23 embassies and yelled about how dangerous AQ was. Indeed, Obama said AQ was on the run back in 2012. Many, many, many times.

Dave, can we go to playback -> 30 seconds in.

 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,828
100,043
We haven't shut down 23 embassies and yelled about how dangerous AQ was. Indeed, Obama said AQ was on the run back in 2012. Many, many, many times.

Dave, can we go to playback -> 30 seconds in.

You honestly think there is ever going to be a day where the government says "Yup, were safe! Terrorism isnt a threat anymore!"? Any entity with power has one overriding objective; preserve its power and expand it whenever possible.

What better way to do that than an ever illusive boogeyman to scare the populace with?
 

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,896
83,317
Phazeal,

Your low estimation of the psychological resolve of our enemies is absurd. The use of drones may be much, much easier for the U.S. and you can worship at the alter of technology all you want but they will not break our enemies and the civilian casualties caused by their use in Pakistan and Yemen are going to result in substantial blowback.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,949
52,725
Let's stop pretending that drones strikes are any different from just lobbing tomahawk missiles at every sand dune we don't like the looks of.