Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
I don't believe this for a second.Drones create a feeling of powerlessness in insurgencies.
I don't believe this for a second.Drones create a feeling of powerlessness in insurgencies.
Like Phazael said, it's the element of risk. if you're putting soldiers' lives in danger, you have to be damn sure there's a good reason to do so. If you're sending unmanned flying killbots, you have nothing to worry about. You can be much more flippant about killing other people if there's no chance any of your guys are gonna get killed in the process.What do you base that off of, though? I can't imagine the sense of detachment would be any different than firing a missile from the cockpit, or firing a gun, or a mortar, etc. Any intermediary you put between you and the killing detaches you somewhat, but I wouldn't think it is cumulative like that.
I'm pretty sure Torrid and I are on opposite sides of the aisle here, yet I completely agree with him - beyond just the unconstitutionality of using the AUMF to bomb 16-year old kids in Yemen. And yes, I'm well aware Bush started the campaign and is just as responsible, but the fact that Bush started it doesn't absolve Obama from responsibility for expanding it. The effects of the drone campaign is to build grass-roots support for AQ.Obama's drone campaign is a massive blunder because it sows hatred and resentment..
Doesn't take much of a stretch of imagination, I agree.If I were a cynical person I might add that the US Government, including the NSA and Obama, are well aware of the fact that using drones is building grass-root support for AQ, and ensuring the continued security state here in the US.
I don't think you know the first thing about what soldiers think or experience in the field, how they operate, or how that compares to drone pilots.You don't think the lives of soldiers are a consideration when deciding to attack other people?
I'm not talking about what the soldiers think or experience. I'm talking about the decision to kill people. It's easier to decide to kill people by sending a drone than by sending soldiers who are putting their lives at risk.I don't think you know the first thing about what soldiers think or experience in the field, how they operate, or how that compares to drone pilots.
I don't talk day to day with Al-Qaeda leaders (sorry NSA asshole who is following this thread) but I'm going to guess from the fact that we've been drone-bombing them for years and AQ seems as strong as ever that it's not as demoralizing as you think.But it is a lot more demoralizing when they risk life and limb (or suicide attack) against a drone and the only consequence is "a_drone_002" spawning a little later with the same dude at the controls.
I don't disagree with this, but really warfare being conducted solely by drones is a relatively new development (as opposed to the drones supplementing existing forces in a specific theatre) and the outrage has gotten pretty intensified since. Its a lot different being able to run in with a bomb strapped to you and gib a bunch of foreigners and collect your 72 virgins, as opposed to getting raped by skynet periodically and having to cross the Atlantic to meaningfully retaliate. Technology has changed a shit ton since the Afghan resistance of the Soviets and while we are not capable of occupying a foreign state effectively (thanks Iraq for proving that), we can basically fuck them up on a near constant basis with drones and other forms of remote ordinance. They could fuck us by sabotaging oil production in the region, but that would put them at odds with the very people financing their bullshit.I don't talk day to day with Al-Qaeda leaders (sorry NSA asshole who is following this thread) but I'm going to guess from the fact that we've been drone-bombing them for years and AQ seems as strong as ever that it's not as demoralizing as you think.
When you're 18, living in Yemen, and can't have sex unless you rape a girl and can't do much else - picking up a gun and killing people probably seems like a rational choice.
Instead of sending in drones, we should pay for brothels, that would cut into AQ recruitment.
he just wants to have a civil discussion, bro. talking out of ass is better than thinking twice before typing.Its actually pretty well documented by this point killing via drone has some pretty adverse affects on the operator.
Edit - looks like in addition to being a Batista, ESL teacher and feminist, Tanoomba is also and expert defense analyst who knows all the protocols for determining the use of deadly force via a drone strike.
How do you define "like this" so that it doesn't include benghazi or killing obama bin ladden? It's not like terrorists have been quiet for 6 years.I like how nothing like this happens in the 6 years of Obama then right after the NSA shit is revealed suddenly we've got the super secret AQ info, thanks to the NSA.
We haven't shut down 23 embassies and yelled about how dangerous AQ was. Indeed, Obama said AQ was on the run back in 2012. Many, many, many times.How do you define "like this" so that it doesn't include benghazi or killing obama bin ladden? It's not like terrorists have been quiet for 6 years.
You honestly think there is ever going to be a day where the government says "Yup, were safe! Terrorism isnt a threat anymore!"? Any entity with power has one overriding objective; preserve its power and expand it whenever possible.We haven't shut down 23 embassies and yelled about how dangerous AQ was. Indeed, Obama said AQ was on the run back in 2012. Many, many, many times.
Dave, can we go to playback -> 30 seconds in.