The NSA watches you poop.

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Royal

Connoisseur of Exotic Pictures
15,077
10,643
Can we officially declare that terrorists have won.
When I was driving to work on the afternoon of 9-11 digesting everything that had happened, I remember thinking to myself "Well, they've won." knowing it was just a matter of time before we started turning in on ourselves and abandoning some of the very ideals that we treasured and that most of the country would prance right into the holding pen baaing like little sheep, content in being allowed to remain warm in their own woolen security.
 

Torrid

Molten Core Raider
926
611
The cynic in me wants to think that the administration cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that what they are doing is ending the problem of terrorism, and they know full well that their campaigns perpetuate the threat they supposedly aim to eradicate. Obama is either incredibly naive enough to buy the shit the military sells him in order to keep their jobs in one of the most peaceful times in history, or Obama knowingly perpetuates security theater and drones Muslims for political reasons. He's either a fool or a traitor, and I can't write him off as a fool so easily like I can most of congress. It's easy to be a traitor when you will not only 100% get away with it, but get rewarded for being one. Being a two-term president is probably the best indicator of treason.

9/11 was 12 years ago and look where we are now. Somebody explain to me with a straight face how bombing children and weddings lessens the threat of terrorism more than just locking our cockpit doors and staying the fuck out of countries that didn't want us there. This 'war' will only end when the would-be terrorists stop hating us enough to not blow themselves up just to harm us-- or at least when we get the hate level down to an 'acceptable' level since there will always be some crazies. What we are doing now to drive that down IS NOT WORKING. Obama can't even be bothered to stop the force feeding of known innocents indefinitely detained without trial FFS. They want to blow us up because we treat them like animals.

If you're still in the all voluntary military, the NSA, etc at this point, you will get no "thanks for your service" from me. You're complicit in the wrongdoing and breaking your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. At least I still have firefighters.
 

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,898
83,322
If you're still in the all voluntary military, the NSA, etc at this point, you will get no "thanks for your service" from me. You're complicit in the wrongdoing and breaking your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. At least I still have firefighters.
Hey, we've got an empire to maintain and expand.
 

Jais

Trakanon Raider
1,901
550
If you're still in the all voluntary military, the NSA, etc at this point, you will get no "thanks for your service" from me. You're complicit in the wrongdoing and breaking your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. At least I still have firefighters.
Phew I'm glad I got out in '07, you're welcome.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Because everyone who works in the government is involved in these programs? Not even close, bro. If you're going to go that route you should damn yourself too. We are all unwilling benefactors from our government's indulgences.
 

Torrid

Molten Core Raider
926
611
I'm not just talking about about the NSA, I'm talking about people who sign up for war after it has been made clear that our military is doing nothing but fanning the flames of resentment toward the United States. Iraq, Afghanistan, Gitmo, Drones-- ALL of it made us LESS safe. Blows my mind we can do what we did to Iraq and nobody gives a shit.

Drone pilots literally sit there dropping bombs on people then watch them die not knowing for sure if they are even 'bad guys' and some of the more remorseful pilots keep doing it just because they don't want new trainees screwing up and making the body count higher. Even if you're not the trigger man and just fuel the robots on base or are a civilian contractor building the damn things at Boeing you're complicit.

Society dictates what is ethical though, so I'm just the crazy anti-war nut.
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,773
2,664
Society dictates what is ethical though, so I'm just the crazy anti-war nut.
Well, since you are posting sanctimoniously on a video game message board I don't think anyone could say you didn't do your part.
 

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
22,506
29,703
too bad theres no insider that could use this for good. Would be funny to see senators get burned for scandals the nsa picked up on. That'd change minds in congress pretty quick.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
I'm not just talking about about the NSA, I'm talking about people who sign up for war after it has been made clear that our military is doing nothing but fanning the flames of resentment toward the United States. Iraq, Afghanistan, Gitmo, Drones-- ALL of it made us LESS safe. Blows my mind we can do what we did to Iraq and nobody gives a shit.

Drone pilots literally sit there dropping bombs on people then watch them die not knowing for sure if they are even 'bad guys' and some of the more remorseful pilots keep doing it just because they don't want new trainees screwing up and making the body count higher. Even if you're not the trigger man and just fuel the robots on base or are a civilian contractor building the damn things at Boeing you're complicit.

Society dictates what is ethical though, so I'm just the crazy anti-war nut.
So everyone else is complicit, but not you for sitting in safety and enjoying the fruits of our military-industrial complex? Or are you posting this from your mountain compound utilizing green energy in between militia training sessions? EVERYONE is complicit. People don't sign up for the military or go to work for the government thinking about all the brown people they can bomb or oppress that day. The vast majority of the missions are rather mundane and come down to support for personnel and other missions.

As far as what made us more of less safe, that is something you certainly aren't qualified to speak to, and probably no one will have a real answer for years to come. When we overthrew the Shah in the 50s no one had any idea we would be where we are today. I'm sure there have been similar situations that worked out more to our advantage. If we're talking about morality, I'm not sure that whether we are more or less safe due to an action is really material, but that is up for debate.
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,833
100,051
The cynic in me wants to think that the administration cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe that what they are doing is ending the problem of terrorism, and they know full well that their campaigns perpetuate the threat they supposedly aim to eradicate. Obama is either incredibly naive enough to buy the shit the military sells him in order to keep their jobs in one of the most peaceful times in history, or Obama knowingly perpetuates security theater and drones Muslims for political reasons. He's either a fool or a traitor, and I can't write him off as a fool so easily like I can most of congress. It's easy to be a traitor when you will not only 100% get away with it, but get rewarded for being one. Being a two-term president is probably the best indicator of treason.

9/11 was 12 years ago and look where we are now. Somebody explain to me with a straight face how bombing children and weddings lessens the threat of terrorism more than just locking our cockpit doors and staying the fuck out of countries that didn't want us there. This 'war' will only end when the would-be terrorists stop hating us enough to not blow themselves up just to harm us-- or at least when we get the hate level down to an 'acceptable' level since there will always be some crazies. What we are doing now to drive that down IS NOT WORKING. Obama can't even be bothered to stop the force feeding of known innocents indefinitely detained without trial FFS. They want to blow us up because we treat them like animals.

If you're still in the all voluntary military, the NSA, etc at this point, you will get no "thanks for your service" from me. You're complicit in the wrongdoing and breaking your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. At least I still have firefighters.
Is this you checking your privilege? Are you college student whose major is liberal arts by chance?
 

Torrid

Molten Core Raider
926
611
So everyone else is complicit, but not you for sitting in safety and enjoying the fruits of our military-industrial complex? Or are you posting this from your mountain compound utilizing green energy in between militia training sessions? EVERYONE is complicit. People don't sign up for the military or go to work for the government thinking about all the brown people they can bomb or oppress that day. The vast majority of the missions are rather mundane and come down to support for personnel and other missions.
Putting "everyone but me is complicit!" in my mouth is a silly way to argue against me.

And there are a small number of people who deliberately live off a small enough income to not pay income tax so they don't have to help pay for the wars. It's rather extreme but I can't help but admire them a little.

I have no doubt that 99% of people enlist with good intentions. The problem is the general public is largely uninformed and the MIC wants it that way. The FBI has literally had advertisements asking to interview drone pilots removed. Probably because when they speak about it, they say things like 'I became a sociopath.'

As far as what made us more of less safe, that is something you certainly aren't qualified to speak to, and probably no one will have a real answer for years to come. When we overthrew the Shah in the 50s no one had any idea we would be where we are today. I'm sure there have been similar situations that worked out more to our advantage. If we're talking about morality, I'm not sure that whether we are more or less safe due to an action is really material, but that is up for debate.
Bullshit. Civilian control of the military is a cornerstone of our democracy. We control them-- or we're SUPPOSED to anyway. You can't just give them free reign to do as they please and throw up your hands saying, 'they know secrets we don't so we're not qualified.' How long would Vietnam have been without civilian protest?

It's not just Iran and the Shah.The listincludes Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. Hell, we even intervened in Russia's 1917 Civil War. Mubarak's tear gas had 'made in the USA' on it and in no surprise, Egypt's opinion of us is one of the lowest in the world. The US has no qualms over supporting pro-US dictators, and we pay a price when they get outted. Russia is evil for arresting gays but our buddy Saudi Arabia executes them and instead of media outrage we sell them 60 billion in arms.

Muslim approval of the US is back down to Bush era lows after Obama has proven to be a gigantic disappointment. Al-Qaeda is the ENEMY of Muslim states and yet we are HATED by the people in those states. That hatred is what fuels AQ-- you won't get some kid to strap a bomb on himself if his response to 'lets kill Americans' is 'why, they never did anything to me.'

Obama's drone campaign is a massive blunder because it sows hatred and resentment. The only three nations in the world that don't disapprove more than approve of our drone use is Israel India and the United States. Even strong allies have disapproval in the 70s.

Here are the Bureau of Investigative Journalism's drone stats:

Total reported killed: 2,548 - 3,549
Civilians reported killed: 411 - 890
Children reported killed: 168 - 197
Total reported injured: 1,177 - 1,480

So by their count, 1 out of every 4 dead are civilians and 6% are kids.

Here's a list of children-- names and ages-- killed by our drones. The 16 year old American kid included.

So who are these people that are so dangerous that we have to accept this much collateral damage? We don't even know in most cases. The so called 'signature strikes' are strikes on people who exhibit certain types of behavior-- we're not just dropping bombs on terrorists with pictures we put on playing cards.

HuffPo Article_sl said:
Jalal Manzar Khail was at his nearby home that day and remembers the attack, which also claimed four of his cousins. Khail's six-year-old son was later afraid -- not unreasonably -- to sleep in their house. "We cannot go home," Khail recounts his son saying. "We have to spend the night in the tree." Khail adds, "Convey my message to Americans: The CIA and America have to stop ... they're just creating more enemies and this will last for hundreds of years."

Khail's message is not uncommon. "At the end of almost every interview I did," Greenwald told me, "the person would say, 'Please tell President Obama I am not a terrorist and he should stop killing my family.'"
So is somebody going to tell me if we don't do this, those 3,000 people we didn't blow up would all buy plane tickets, go to the USA, and bomb a crowd somewhere? It's absurd. We just execute suspects with drones because ironically it is politically easier to drop a bomb on their heads than capture and try them.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Putting "everyone but me is complicit!" in my mouth is a silly way to argue against me.

And there are a small number of people who deliberately live off a small enough income to not pay income tax so they don't have to help pay for the wars. It's rather extreme but I can't help but admire them a little.

I have no doubt that 99% of people enlist with good intentions. The problem is the general public is largely uninformed and the MIC wants it that way. The FBI has literally had advertisements asking to interview drone pilots removed. Probably because when they speak about it, they say things like 'I became a sociopath.'
What does income tax have to do with it? Do you live in this society? Partake in the consumer process? It isn't about arguing against you, what you said was just silly. A guy who provides support to troops in some way or supports intelligence collection against adversaries does not have any knowledge of or play in these complaints that you bring against the government, specifically the NSA and military, but you want to paint them all as "complicit" in whatever wrongdoing you perceive while exonerating yourself and others who benefit just the same from the actions these entities take. It is bullshit.

Bullshit. Civilian control of the military is a cornerstone of our democracy. We control them-- or we're SUPPOSED to anyway. You can't just give them free reign to do as they please and throw up your hands saying, 'they know secrets we don't so we're not qualified.' How long would Vietnam have been without civilian protest?
Who said it wasn't? What I said is that you are in no position to make sweeping proclamations about our comparable level of safety. You're making generalizations and assumptions.

I wonder what your drone casualty list would look like if it were an invasion rather than targeted drone strikes. We certainly have somerecent dataon that. Of course it is done because it is politically easier. Did the administration ever claim otherwise? That isn't the sole reason, but it is a major contributor.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,042
138,855
I wonder what your drone casualty list would look like if it were an invasion rather than targeted drone strikes.
That's the whole point about drone strikes, if there where american pilots in those vehicles bombing other countries people would have a totally different perception of it, and be alot more outraged about it. However because it's a drone killing machine without people in them we accept it, it makes the everyday use of those things much more likely and the guy on the ground getting hit by the drone strike could give 2 shits of the opportunity cost vs an invasion (that would never happen with the current political climate), he still got his ass toasted. It also has the side effect of making people really angry when they dwell on the concept of loitering killing machines patrolling over their heads.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
I don't really see the difference between piloted aircraft and drones, but that's me.idk, like I said, how angry would those people be over loitering soldiers in their streets? Given the option I like the idea of the drone program, although I do think we need more oversight into the program. But the things I would want to know, like which countries we have explicit agreements with concerning these drones, are not things we are ever likely to know.
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
14,803
32,026
They hate the drones because they represent risk free remote killing. With a manned aircraft, the pilot is potentially at risk of being shot down and captured/killed. Drones create a feeling of powerlessness in insurgencies. There is also the element of detachment that makes the choice to kill easier for the operator, which was discussed somewhat during Gulf War 1 when we were tomahawking the fuck out of Iraq.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
What do you base that off of, though? I can't imagine the sense of detachment would be any different than firing a missile from the cockpit, or firing a gun, or a mortar, etc. Any intermediary you put between you and the killing detaches you somewhat, but I wouldn't think it is cumulative like that.