Whats funny about that is nothing you just described is illegal. What Trademark did was illegal, ambushing and beating up someone for "following" them. So in your example, you'd be the one getting your ass beat by some poor disadvantaged black honor student who was going to be a nasa space pilot some day after he got through creating the cure for cancer. I hope in your case someone actually comes to help you and your not forced to defend yourself.I don't think that's terribly likely, since I don't make a habit of following people around while carrying a gun just because they look like they shouldn't be in my neighborhood.
I guess the difference between you and me is that I recognize that it's possible for a chain of actions to be legal, and still be a bad idea that just might end up putting me in a bad situation.Whats funny about that is nothing you just described is illegal.
Except that did happen initially. Not until the media decided to twist facts and straight up lie, did this get out of hand and was a trial deemed necessary.For my part, I think it's in society's best interest that we take an extended look at the circumstances that led to him killing another person, even if it turns out there isn't enough evidence to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
I see, so the first responders, eye witnesses, police detectives, medical examiners and who all backed up Zimmerman's story from the beginning have to have a trial to further prove to you that every T has been crossed and every I dotted. Gotcha.For my part, I think it's in society's best interest that we take an extended look at the circumstances that led to him killing another person, even if it turns out there isn't enough evidence to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
What you forget is that the police at the scene didn't just ignore the evidence. They looked at the evidence presented and it was fairly clear that Zimmerman had acted in self-defense. Then the first prosecutor made the same determination. Only after it got drummed up in the media and fairly innocent things were drummed up into racism (kinda like your 40+ calls in a year BS) that a special prosecutor came in and charged 2nd degree murder.I imagine a lot of people in Florida agree with the number of posters in this thread that think Zimmerman should've been sent home by the police with a tender kiss on the cheek, perhaps with a medal pinned to his chest for some damn fine American Inventorshootin'
Prosecution actually very rarely loses trials... I would guess most prosecutors do have a 90-95% win rate. They don't take cases to trial that they can't win, generally. Look at the two most famous acquittals... OJ and Casey Anthony. Both of those should have been slam dunk convictions...Bullshit. The purpose of a trial is to expose evidence that can then be examined in a careful way. If the world worked the way you think it does, every prosecutor would have a 100% conviction rate.
As far as "a tremendous burden", boo fucking hoo. You know who has a bigger burden? Trayvon Martin. Six feet of dirt above him. I'm not too sad that Zimmerman is being mildly inconvenienced by having to defend himself in a court of law.
You have implied over and over again that the media didn't blow things out of proportion or make shit up, yet you yourself did the very same thing the media did. It's fucking hilarious.Man, the 40 calls in a year thing is turning into your Seal Team Ten. It's pretty hilarious.
Citation needed on your 90-95 percent. Im guessing your source is your own ass.Prosecution actually very rarely loses trials... I would guess most prosecutors do have a 90-95% win rate. They don't take cases to trial that they can't win, generally. Look at the two most famous acquittals... OJ and Casey Anthony. Both of those should have been slam dunk convictions...
I actually have very rarely seen felony prosecutors bring weak cases to trial. Misdemeanor, yes, because they just don't spend much time on the cases and don't prep much if at all... felony cases they usually know inside and out, and they plead out the weak ones.
The DA's office KNEW they couldn't convict this guy and thus refused to charge him... but the public pressure resulted in a trial anyway. That the state is going to lose. What was the point of this, exactly?
46 calls over 7 years, most of them Non Emergency Number calls. Heres a breakdown, they are all individually numbered since you appear to have problems with numbers, dates, years, the truth...Man, the 40 calls in a year thing is turning into your Seal Team Ten. It's pretty hilarious.
http://www.dallasda.co/webdev/info/meet-the-da/Citation needed on your 90-95 percent. Im guessing your source is your own ass.
Prosecution has nowhere near that rate, even after they fudge their own numbers with plea bargains on cases they think they will lose.