Request denied. If you get upset by Fanaskin editing posts, consider his posts and early draft until an hour or so passes.Can Amod take away Fanaskin's ability to edit posts? For fucks sake he edits EVERY SINGLE POST!
Siding with Fana, Tuco? Why do you hate the Jews?Request denied. If you get upset by Fanaskin editing posts, consider his posts and early draft until an hour or so passes.
No I wouldn't.You'd be fucking cheering too.
So if your business had been flattened, your neighbor's kid maimed by a rocket, and the day care you send your kid to had just been blown up a few days prior, you wouldn't be happy at finally seeing counterstrikes against those launch sites? You're a better man than most then.No I wouldn't.
Considering I cast my vote in favor of a terrorist government whose mandate openly calls for the death of Israeli civilians, no I wouldn't. I signed up for the current state of affairs when I cast my ballot-- my government is doing exactly what they promised and what I elected them for. Considering the Israeli airstrikes are in direct reprisal/response for my government firing rockets at civilian areas, no I wouldn't. Considering my government isn't even making a pretext of targeting the Israeli military, and instead focusing all efforts on schools and a nuclear power plant within radiation fallout distance of where I live, no I wouldn't.If you were a survivor of the recent Israeli bombings in Gaza, and Palestinians were launching rocket attacks into Israel, would you be cheering?
His "data" uses european countries which make south american countries look like shit. But fine then, how about the central american ones! Or the non muslim african ones? Or any other terribad place where there are no muslims? His conclusion is shit because he cherry picked the data that fits his narrative.I dont think there is a single South American country that can be considered a "shithole" and I'd gladly live in any of them over any muslim country
The Jews are committing the slowest genocide against the Palestinians ever. You'd think Hitler would have been a better instructor on how to get the job done quick. Or are you just liberally using genocide because you're an idiot?Well obviously if they pushed it too much further the international community might feel obligated to intervene. It's late and I can't remember if the UN definition of genocide has been revised since it was adopted in 48, but there's a section that talks about inflicting on a group conditions designed to bring about it's destruction in whole or in part. Maybe it comes down to individual perception, but their actions make it seem pretty clear to me that their long term goal is for there to be no more Palestinians, or for their population to be so dramatically reduced as to be more easily managed.
Genocide doesn't just mean loading people in ovens or chopping them up with machetes, the United States used a mix of violent and non violent (relatively speaking) means to commit genocide on the Native American people.
Can you give your source to those chicago/palestine comparison figures? Not that I don't believe you, but I want to site them in another debate I'm watching, and I am sure they will want a source.Population of Palestinian Territories: 4.7 Million.
Number of deaths from conflict with Israel since 1987: 8000
Chicago Population: 2.7 Million.
Number of deaths from violence in Chicago since1987: 17488
Chicago's death rate by violence is over 3 timesworse, per capita, than Israel's "genocide" against Palestinians. Can you explain how this is a genocide? I mean, there is a precept in genocide about birth prevention, but considering the Palestinian population grows faster than even Israeli one--and Israel is the chief source of maternity and natal care, as well as advanced medical care for Palestinians...I'm not exactly sure you can makethatcase. Israel has dome some fuckery with food supplies and embargo, for sure, but there is, as far as I'm aware, almost no starvation deaths (And, ironically, Palastinians are being starved to death more by Syria than Israel.)
Don't get me wrong, I think Israel has plenty of blood on it's hands--but calling it a "genocide"? Come on, Sparkle. Get it together. This would be the weakest genocide in history.
By slow you mean never, right? Because by using population statistics not only will "genocide" never be achieved, but in fact the exact opposite is occurring-- massive Palestinian population growth. Gaza is 12th in population growth and 3rd in obesity in the WORLD, not exactly characteristics of genocide. If the Israelis are currently trying to commit genocide, they'd be better off giving the Palestinian women an education and birth control pills, because ironically that would be more effective of achieving anything that could be described as genocide than their current strategy of using armed conflict. Please tell me how the fuck you can connect the dots that paint a picture of anything resembling genocide in light of actual statistical fact that point otherwise. You're insulting the victims of Rwanda, Nazi Germany, and Armenia-- why don't you look at the population statistics for those true genocides for a true definition of what the word means.The Jews are committing the slowest genocide against the Palestinians ever. You'd think Hitler would have been a better instructor on how to get the job done quick. Or are you just liberally using genocide because you're an idiot?
If you're directing that message to Badabidi he's making the same argument you are. Go have some coffee cuz and come back to explain away how many Palestinians civilians will die in the next couple days because of Israeli attacks!By slow you mean never, right? Because by using population statistics not only will "genocide" never be achieved, but in fact the exact opposite is occurring-- massive Palestinian population growth. Gaza is 12th in population growth and 3rd in obesity in the WORLD, not exactly characteristics of genocide. If the Israelis are currently trying to commit genocide, they'd be better off giving the Palestinian women an education and birth control pills, because ironically that would be more effective of achieving anything that could be described as genocide than their current strategy of using armed conflict. Please tell me how the fuck you can connect the dots that paint a picture of anything resembling genocide in light of actual statistical fact that point otherwise. You're insulting the victims of Rwanda, Nazi Germany, and Armenia-- why don't you look at the population statistics for those true genocides for a true definition of what the word means.