Top Gun: Maverick (2020)

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Xarpolis

Xarpolis

Life's a Dream
14,852
16,666
The NASCAR fans were probably just made that everyone wanted to quit racing as soon as they suffered a bad accident.

"Get out of here, you faggots!"
 
Sadre Spinegnawer

Sadre Spinegnawer

<Banned>
4,107
4,043
My Brother, former marine, hates Tom Cruise because of A Few Good Men. He does have a case, as they say. His argument is, Cruise demanded the film be made simple, and he is the good guy, and Nicholson's character is the bad guy. That was probably a Hollywood decision, though. Hollywood likes simple.

That film is worth a close watch in order to spot who the true "villain" in the case of Private Santiago's death is. Once you get it, it is pretty clear. Let's just say, he should have turned his stethoscope up to 11. Well, that pretty much gives it away...
 
Gravel

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
40,250
133,184
Geez, not even just 2022, but summer 2022. It'll be like 3 years after filming wrapped that they release it.
 
Kirun

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
19,470
15,822
Gravel said:
Geez, not even just 2022, but summer 2022. It'll be like 3 years after filming wrapped that they release it.
Click to expand...
ROFL. These fucking retarded fossils at these studios who think we're going to ever go back to theatres being full. At the very best, half of them will be empty due to passports.

Release it on your platforms, charge $30, and call it good. Simultaneously release it in theatres for the states that haven't yet cucked out.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users
Big Phoenix

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,770
99,852
And yet Netflix will spend 500 million on a 20 year old sitcom.

What a time to be alive.
 
Fucker

Fucker

Log Wizard
13,072
30,002
Sadre Spinegnawer said:
My Brother, former marine, hates Tom Cruise because of A Few Good Men. He does have a case, as they say. His argument is, Cruise demanded the film be made simple, and he is the good guy, and Nicholson's character is the bad guy. That was probably a Hollywood decision, though. Hollywood likes simple.

That film is worth a close watch in order to spot who the true "villain" in the case of Private Santiago's death is. Once you get it, it is pretty clear. Let's just say, he should have turned his stethoscope up to 11. Well, that pretty much gives it away...
Click to expand...
Demi Moore was the villain in that movie. She did her damnedest to destroy it.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,141
214,421
Cruise chunked up. lol
pagesix.com

Tom Cruise looks like a whole new person at baseball game

The actor, 59, seemed puffier than usual while attending Game 2 of the National League Division Series between the LA Dodgers and San Francisco Giants.
pagesix.com pagesix.com
cruise-1.jpg
 
  • 1Like
  • 1WTF
Reactions: 1 users
jayrebb

jayrebb

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
14,774
14,726
  • 2Like
  • 1Garbage
Reactions: 2 users
spronk

spronk

FPS noob
23,491
27,463
what if tom cruise's xenu volcano immortality is only sustained by people watching his movie in theaters

a modern day Dorian Gray
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Worf
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 2 users
Pogi.G

Pogi.G

Silver Baronet of the Realm
1,799
9,245
Slaanesh69 said:
Okay first off - why? Why is this movie? Cruise doesn't need the money? Maybe Scientology is suffering of late and needs an influx of cash.

That being said, I will echo other sentiments that I love Cruise and pretty much ALL of his movies, so I remain reservedly interested.

Here's the thing though. When the original came out, jet fighters and combat was still a cool thing; the cold war was recent, there was still friction with an "enemy" with decently comparable air capability. Fighter sims were all the rage in computer gaming.

But at present, and in comparison to the time of the original, very few give two shits about air warfare, knows much about front line aviation, new designs, what is good at what, etc etc. And, shit, there is no real "enemy" as someone else alluded - if it is "mah Russians" again that will be lame.

Seriously, I was big on all this in the way back, but do they even fly Tomcats anymore? Is it Hornets off the ships now? Do they stage F16s off the carriers as well? And isn't there F19s and F20s of some kind?

Edit - the flight stuff looks boss, can't deny it.
Click to expand...

I agree with this. We have no enemies that are even remotely close to competing against us in air combat. Maybe in the movie England wants a rematch for 1776, and they turn against us for some reason. Still wouldn't be much of a fight...

Sure as hell won't be China. Their military tried to show off their air combat prowess a couple of years ago and sent footage from the first Top Gun to their media.



Although this could be just a "training the next class" movie with no war type fighting. Could totally see them setting this up for a Top Gun 3 where they attack conservative America, you know, to drive out the racist evil nazis.

Just saying... Hollywood can't be too far off from making movies about the "righteous killing of conservatives". It's coming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.