Twitch.tv

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Mao

Trakanon Raider
649
1,646
I"m not sure why i can see it, guess the first one is free. It's a long article, but here's the end of it:
“I recall that Dr Disrespect was made aware by the individual that they were underage during the conversation, after which he indicated that this was no problem and continued on,” the former employee says. “There was no confusion. Messages sent after this was acknowledged were no less graphic and in sexually explicit nature than before, and I think more than the categorization of ‘leaning too much in the direction of being inappropriate’ might indicate.”
The ex-Twitch employee has also provided Rolling Stone a more detailed account of internal conversations at Twitch following the report of Beahm’s messages and his subsequent ban. They say the details of Beahm’s case are coming out because of Conners’ explosive tweet last week. “Cody definitely got the ball rolling. Me and many of my former colleagues are only comfortable speaking up now because of it. Our priority is always to the safety of the [alleged] victim and to keep their identity secret,” they said.
As some of its streamers faced a flood of sexual misconduct allegations in June 2020, Twitch created an incident response team codenamed “Gold Sparrow” to develop a process to investigate and take action on the reports as one unit, the former employee says. “We wanted to be able to process mounting investigations quicker and with more resources while providing as much support for the victims as possible,” the former employee says. (Twitch did not provide comment by press time.)
When the initial report about Beahm’s alleged inappropriate messages came through in 2020, an investigation began. “After viewing the contents of the Whisper conversation, it quickly became clear the egregiousness of conduct and what actions Twitch must take,” the former employee says. “The decision to permanently terminate Beahm was relatively quick, due to the severity of the behavior.”
Twitch can’t and won’t make the alleged messages public, the ex-employee says, as this “not only endangers the victim and investigations by law enforcement”
In early 2021, the Twitch trust and safety team created OSIT, an investigation team for reports of off-site misconduct by creators. At the time, the company described the initiative as a direct response to “allegations of sexual misconduct that surfaced across the gaming industry over the summer.” In assessing those allegations, the company said, it had “realized that our current policy regarding off-service misconduct was not clear enough.” Among the alleged off-site behaviors it pledged to investigate were sexual exploitation of children, including child grooming.

Following Beahm’s ban from Twitch and time away from the spotlight, he announced a return to streaming on YouTube in August 2020. But while he was free to use both that platform and Facebook Gaming, neither offered him an exclusive partnership. His lack of a streaming contract was notable for a celebrity in the industry at a time when other streamers like Valkyrae, Ludwig Ahgren, and TimTheTatman were signing seven-figure, multi-year deals.
YouTube’s former global head of gaming partnerships at Google, Ryan Wyatt, confirmed to Rolling Stone that Beahm was not offered a contract due to chatter about the circumstances of his Twitch ban. He says that a Twitch employee and journalists investigating the incident told YouTube employees that it involved inappropriate messages to a minor.
“The unfortunate part of all of it was there were so many rumors circulating in the industry, one that a minor was involved,” he says. “But no one produced first-hand knowledge or evidence, and because of those rumors, there was no reason to entertain doing any deal with [Beahm], and no evidence produced means you can’t act on a [terms of service] violation. The whole situation got even more confusing when Twitch settled and effectively said, ‘no wrongdoing’ which made everyone in the industry dismiss the rumors, but even still, there was never a reason to do a deal with him after that ban.”


A spokesperson for CAA, Beahm’s talent agency since signing in 2019, tells Rolling Stone he is no longer a client and hasn’t been for sometime. Several high-profile streamers, including Kai Cenat, Codemiko, and Valkyrae have condemned Beahm in recent days. The San Francisco 49ers, for whom he had sometimes played a promotional role, announced that it was cutting ties with him, while the video game franchise NBA 2K said it would remove his character from the series.
“Even today I’m humbled by that experience,” says the former Twitch employee who was at the company when it mobilized to address the reports of misconduct by Beahm and others in the summer of 2020. “The bravery of the victims speaking out and the commitment by my colleagues to doing right by them. I hope that we’re all on a better path now for it.”
Thanks, and this pretty much what was summed up by the other sites posting their articles. Only real additional news is that apparently this source isn't the one who made the original tweet.

The Golden Sparrow and OSIT stuff are really just throw aways to help protect Twitch imo, since OSIT was year after Doc's ban, and there is no indication Golden Sparrow is what led to Doc being caught. Also the 'Twitch can't make message public because it endangers victim and investigations'. Not buying that either, since they can redact the minor's info and any investigation from law enforcement is what, over 4 yrs now? I find it hard to believe there is any ongoing investigation on this unless it has just been reopened.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,899
52,624
Also there's that whole 'The author of the Rolling Stone article is one of the sources' thing.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Mao

Trakanon Raider
649
1,646
Think something was missed here. I was saying the Cody person who tweeted could be one of the sources Rolling Stone used. After getting a better read, I was wrong and it was an additional source besides Cody, which I stated above. I reread my posts to check, but I never said the Rolling Stone author was one of the sources.
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,646
99,443
The one major point that keeps sticking is that a judge / courts read the transcripts and not only didn't recommend criminal prosecution but also awarded him for the suit.
I dont think youre gonna find many DAs willing to go after a person especially one with money for mere text messages that dont involve pics/video.




1719553467258.png
 
  • 2Faggotry
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 3 users

Mao

Trakanon Raider
649
1,646
I get the DA not going after him, but arbitration giving him the remainder of his contract is what makes it more curious.

And fucking LOL at him and the tranny pics. That's hilarious. I wonder if he was all down for the cam shows till the dick flopped out. :eek:
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Aaron

Goonsquad Officer
<Bronze Donator>
8,879
20,928
I've never watched this guy though I've heard about him often (in this thread). So he got into trouble for sending messages to a 17 year old? Were they sexual in nature or just chatting? Also, how far into her 17 years was she, cos I've always found it a bit strange about the US legal (and moral) system in that a girl can be, say 17 years and 50 weeks old, and she's a "child" and even looking funny at her can get you on a register, but wait a couple of weeks and she can open up a Chaturbate or OF account and stream herself having the local football team run a train on her and it's all good and legal and morally right (if you're a section of liberal feminist).

Honestly, at the end of the day, who cares?
 

Ortega

Vyemm Raider
1,185
2,674
This shit is so fucking retarded. My grandmothers on both sides were 16 and 17 when they got married. Not defending Dr. here, because dude was married with children, but holy shit. Government draws an arbitrary line in the sand and it's gospel. Twitch being morality police on something that apparently was suggestive messaging at best (no meetup, no overt sexual content apparently) is laughable. We're talking about a game streaming site that's #1 channel is "Just Chatting" and we all know what that is compromised of. What do you think the age demographic is consumer wise for those channels? Do you think every sub/donor is over the age of 18?

I read Reddit and they act like this dude was a serial rapist. Meanwhile those fucks can't even handle a counter argument without throwing a fit. Shit if you could do some kind of case study I wager anyone who spends a significant amount of time on Reddit would take any girl giving them attention regardless of age and be FAR MORE SEXUAL in their messaging. We have fucking Destiny doing commentary on this shit where he literally lets his wife get pounded by other men then cries when they end up divorcing like everyone predicted. Insanity!
 

Xevy

Log Wizard
8,937
4,191
Props to all the FBI guys combing the board staying up late after reading these posts and updating their lists.
 
  • 4Worf
  • 1NPC
  • 1Moron
Reactions: 5 users

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,899
52,624
Twitch being morality police on something that apparently was suggestive messaging at best (no meetup, no overt sexual content apparently) is laughable.
The current accusation is that he's completely lying and that they were full on sexting and that he asked her about Twitchcon. It's possible that it's true and the judge who reviewed the chat logs decided that a legal private conversation didn't constitute a breach of contract. Also very possible that the current "accusers" are taking advantage of the fact that the chat logs likely cannot ever be released which means the allegations can never be publicly proven or disproven.
 

GhenghisKhan

Molten Core Raider
160
104
The one major point that keeps sticking is that a judge / courts read the transcripts and not only didn't recommend criminal prosecution but also awarded him for the suit.

They had a civil arbitration. Why would a judge be reading the transcripts? And how would you know if anybody at all passed along the information to authorities? You jump to many assumptions defending this dude.
 

GuardianX

Perpetually Pessimistic
<Bronze Donator>
7,180
18,187
They had a civil arbitration. Why would a judge be reading the transcripts? And how would you know if anybody at all passed along the information to authorities?

1719582169270.png


One way or another, and I'll change the word "Judge" for you, "PROFESSIONALS" read the transcripts of what was said between this obviously impressionable youth and decided that nothing needed to be done on that matter AND THEN gave this dude money.

As far as I am aware, any court official that is made aware of child abuse in California would be required to report it under their, "California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act". Again, as far as I am aware, an arbiter would fall under "mandatory reporters" outlined in CANRA.

But hey, you know more about this than I do, more than likely.

---

You jump to many assumptions defending this dude.

Why does everyone have to be in camp A or Camp B?

I'm in my own camp, the camp that loves to see drama and hates pretentious California dip-shits.

If the dude is guilty, put him under the prison.

If the douche that's trying to sell venue-tickets by shilling the dudes name every chance he can get is lying, put HIM under the prison.

It's really not that hard.
 

jooka

marco esquandolas
<Bronze Donator>
15,037
6,479
If you think most people need the legal limits of the law to judge his behavior don't see the world very realistically when his own words will forever haunt him - "These were casual, mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate, but nothing more."
 

GuardianX

Perpetually Pessimistic
<Bronze Donator>
7,180
18,187
If you think most people need the legal limits of the law to judge his behavior don't see the world very realistically when his own words will forever haunt him - "These were casual, mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate, but nothing more."

I don't, normal people don't, an arbiter doesn't.

That's my point.

I don't care what he says on his twitter, I don't care what any of the twitch employees say.

I care that people WHO ARE REQUIRED REPORTERS OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, read what they said and said nothing to law enforcement.
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,646
99,443
I care that people WHO ARE REQUIRED REPORTERS OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, read what they said and said nothing to law enforcement


Itis a shame twitch won't go down nor all the other thots grooming kids doing everything possible to get them to their onlyfans.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users

GuardianX

Perpetually Pessimistic
<Bronze Donator>
7,180
18,187
Who knows, maybe with this something will be made public and hit national news so that all streaming platforms become "adults only" or, even better, close in an explosive way with a ton of people going to jail.

Ahh the dream...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Leadsalad

Cis-XYite-Nationalist
6,170
12,733
You generally can’t see settlement cases, hence why settlements don’t set precedent or allow the public to find out any details.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Ortega

Vyemm Raider
1,185
2,674
The current accusation is that he's completely lying and that they were full on sexting and that he asked her about Twitchcon. It's possible that it's true and the judge who reviewed the chat logs decided that a legal private conversation didn't constitute a breach of contract. Also very possible that the current "accusers" are taking advantage of the fact that the chat logs likely cannot ever be released which means the allegations can never be publicly proven or disproven.
Dude just because this saw the light of day doesn't mean much. I am disappointed in the Dr. for his lack of integrity with relation to his family. He is not a fucking predator even if he wanted to tap some 17 year old, and the fact that degens from Twitch and Reddit are being the morality police is peak insanity. Twitch is literally softcore porn for sub 18 year old boys ALL DAY LONG. I think it was Justin Waller who said give a man a button he can press where he can fuck any chicks he wants and never be caught and 99.99% of men would press it. Not saying it's a great feeling knowing we're so beastial at our core, but that's a fucking reality, and when actors are slapping 18 year old ass at 50 or 60+ years old I find myself without a single fuck to give.
 
  • 4Like
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 5 users