Maybe you should look at the actual study that you are quoting from that review article for starters.You are MORE than welcome to quote anything in that study that refutes anything that I have stated as factual if you think I am soooo wrong about my stance. If my argument was standing on sand instead of bedrock, I'd have not linked the studies at all, nor would I so willingly want to engage in this. I'd have said "fuck y'all, I'm being silenced" in the GG thread and simply let it go from there. The fact I pulled subsequent quotes from there here is clear indication that I WANT to be scrutinized... to be attempted to be proved wrong. Why? Because I know my arguments are true and based in research and data.
Prove me wrong and I'll concede I misread, misunderstood, misquoted, or simply was too stupid to understand the context involved. So far, you have failed to even attempt this and the ONLY person who quoted something different in ANY of the studies I've shared was Ambiturner which I promptly carved up.
Ball's in your court. Make your team proud Zyyz. Or, just sit your ass on the bench and shut the fuck up.
Google Scholar
scholar.google.com
- 1