Well in Beck's defense (WTF? Did I just fucking type that?!?!) he was warning about this guy from the beginning. Everyone else though went all in as you said, though it is too far from the elections now for any real price to be paid. The American attention span is like 5 minutes, not 5 months.Meh, its all damage control right now. They were all up in the guys nuts until today, now they have to run like rats and pray no one remembers all the crap they were saying just a few days ago, on camera. I expect Stewart and Colbert to have fun with this latest little episode, especially since Stewart slammed Hannity yesterday over it.
Beck probably called him once and felt him up on a few issues, then decided this isn't gonna work outWell in Beck's defense (WTF? Did I just fucking type that?!?!) he was warning about this guy from the beginning. Everyone else though went all in as you said, though it is too far from the elections now for any real price to be paid. The American attention span is like 5 minutes, not 5 months.
Unless the disappearance of a commercial jetliner is involved.The American attention span is like 5 minutes, not 5 months.
Pretty much this. He just didn't use the euphemisms the media and most other crazies have learned to use to temper it.I really don't see why the regressives are suddenly trying to put clear water between themselves and this nutjob - heisthe Republican base, and he's not saying anything they don't throw out as dogwhistles 24/7.
He's just using plain English rather than talking about "Welfare Queens" and the like.
True enough I imagine but I imagine I'll be long dead before things change much.Once this global warming thing starts to kick in, you'll see exactly how excited we do get about it, Mr. Calgary.
Does anyone outside of CNN or Tad10 even remember that?Unless the disappearance of a commercial jetliner is involved.
CNN is still running with it because it's getting them higher ratings than actual news.Does anyone outside of CNN or Tad10 even remember that?
Unless it's a student loan...You can declare bankruptcy to get out of debt.
Why not? People on the libertarian right say that taxes are 'essentially slavery' all the time.Under slavery I do what my master wishes as long as it'd legal for him to force me to do it.
Under perpetual debt (Ex: Where I owe more on my house than it's worth and student loans I have no way to pay off) I can do whatever I wish as long as it's legal and I pay interest on my debt.
You can't just take freedom-restraining aspects of owing money, point out comparisons of that system to slavery and say they're the same thing. If you think you can, please look to the current freedoms enjoyed by someone with a mortgage and the current freedoms enjoyed by one of the thousands of sex slaves that exist currently, or any slave in history if you want to start cherry picking.
There's a huge difference between renting a property and owning it in the current system. Even though the govt has certain rights to privately owned property (Taxes, imminent domain, laws on land use etc), the private owner still has massive rights that make calling it 'renting' silly.I wouldnt say slavery, but servitude. Property taxes ensure you dont own any land, you just rent it from the government.
Sure, but that's not because they're the government, that's because they're an entity above a certain threshold of power. Don't think for a second that Intel, Apple, Monsanto, Goldman Sax, Rupert Murdoch or any of the others wouldn't do the same thing, if they could.If the government could charge you for air, they would.