So basically, Assad is as guilty as George Zimmerman was.
which is to say not at all
So basically, Assad is as guilty as George Zimmerman was.
The circle is now complete.So basically, Assad is as guilty as George Zimmerman was.
which is to say not at all
I don't disagree with you, but unless Sen. McCain called for US soldiers to invade Syria he hasn't backpeddled or changed his stance on the issue. He wants to use the US military to destroy Assad's ability to fight and arm whatever rebels there are to fight the ground war. If the US engages more heavily than we're willing this would work, especially if we had done it a year or even two years ago.He's been calling for war in Syria for so long who the fuck even knows anymore. He conveniently left the details of any sort of plan out of it so if it goes wrong he can blame the uppity negro for doing exactly what he's been asking for months.
But without troops, what do any of these fucking people think bombing rubble into smaller rubble is even going to do? How are you supposed to find the targets? How are you going to verify that you HIT something when all the Syrian gov is going to do is call it a "milk factory" every time? McCain knows goddamn well bombing isn't going to accomplish shit, the whole thing is just being turned into a giant trap so they can finally get the Obummer impeachment they've been jizzing their pants dreaming of for six years. They are handing Obama his own noose, and he's either too stupid to see it or just does not care.
I'm calling it now. Every time the Syrian news reports the destruction of a "milk factory", "hospital", or "school", drink your entire stash.
Common sense is the last thing the White House would want people to use when considering whether President Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack.
Yeah, and we know that US has NEVER supplied anyone in ME with chemical weapons or launched false flag attacks to create a casus belli.Well, I mean, shit.. Its not rocket surgery. I know everyone loves conspiracy theories, but come the fuck on.
Assad has Sarin in possession. Its secured with the highest priority. He has the rockets. He has had trouble moving troops into rebel areas due to high numbers of IEDs being used by veteran Jihadists. So, motive, opportunity and material. Can anyone show me any evidence, anywhere, that Rebels had access to the gas and rockets? Yet some people put as much credence to this hypothetical as to the 99% probable.
I dont know.. maybe the Jews gassed themselves in 1945 in order to advance their zionist agenda.
Rebels raided chemical weapons plants in SyriaIts secured with the highest priority.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...08-29-03-11-56Last week, fighters from a group that the Obama administration has branded a terrorist organization were among rebels who seized the Sheik Suleiman military base near Aleppo, where research on chemical weapons had been conducted. Rebels are also closing in on another base near Aleppo, known as Safirah, which has served as a major production center for such munitions, according to U.S. officials and analysts.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The intelligence linking Syrian President Bashar Assad or his inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack is no "slam dunk," with questions remaining about who actually controls some of Syria's chemical weapons stores and doubts about whether Assad himself ordered the strike, U.S. intelligence officials say.
How many rebels did the chemical weapons kill?Well, I mean, shit.. Its not rocket surgery. I know everyone loves conspiracy theories, but come the fuck on.
Assad has Sarin in possession. Its secured with the highest priority. He has the rockets. He has had trouble moving troops into rebel areas due to high numbers of IEDs being used by veteran Jihadists. So, motive, opportunity and material. Can anyone show me any evidence, anywhere, that Rebels had access to the gas and rockets? Yet some people put as much credence to this hypothetical as to the 99% probable.
I dont know.. maybe the Jews gassed themselves in 1945 in order to advance their zionist agenda.
No fewer than 1, no more than 60 billion.How many rebels did the chemical weapons kill?
Probably alotHow many rebels did the chemical weapons kill?
Who are the "rebels"? most of them don't come from Syria, they are imported from chechyna, iraq, qatar, saudi arabia, libya, trained and armed by qatar/saudi/turkey/cia why wouldn't they be willing to gas innocent Syrians to get what they want? The "rebels"(invaders) aren't a homogeneous indigenous group.
In Vietnam Americans would often wind up killing south Vietnamese as well, when you aren't from a place you are more likely to do things like that.
According to an English translation of the memo, besides Saudis, the prisoners included Afghans, Egyptians, Iraqis, Jordanians, Kuwaitis, Pakistanis, Palestinians, Somalis, Sudanese, Syrians and Yemenis. All faced "execution by sword" for murder, rape or drug smuggling.
It's all about perception, no? In the Saudi world this is perfectly acceptable.