What a bigot. You didnt even include the Sister of Silence that run hand in hand with the Custodes.Hey dumb faggot. There are already armies where women would be appropriate. The Sisters of Battle. The Imperial Guard/Astral Militarum. Elder, or literally any race based army or chaos. Where it is not appropriate is the super men specifically called out to be only men.
If the codex wrote out that this female custodian was actually a SoS allowed to participate in a blood game, it would have been fantastic and lore expanding, but still within the realm of appropriate.The sisters of silence are the real losers in the retcon. They were essentially the female Custodes for game teams, and are interesting lorewise. In the heresy / seige of Terra books, there were some good SoS pov characters and SoS/Custodes partnerships.
In ancient 40k women had naked tits. What's your point?In ancient 40K Custodes were just guardsmen.
In ancient 40k women had naked tits. What's your point?
On the tabletop, Custodes are suppose to be major tanky, fairly killy, but low numbers because of their high points cost per model.Are they supposed to be stronger than Grey Knights? GK was the only other Army I had considered way back when, but I don't think there were a lot of models at the time and I guess we're used to supplement a Space Marine army or something.
Just wondering.
Only progressive brain-rot could equate modifying lore to make something more bad-ass and awesome to play for your current, niche audience of exclusively men with modifying the foundations of a now-expansive universe at the height of its popularity for political reasons while your audience remains exclusively male.That people crying about the alleged lore-sanctity of Custodes, when they haven't been anything resembling original lore for a decade or so, are just lying to themselves instead of simply admitting to being the female-o-phobic cavemen-nazis they are.
Yes.Are they supposed to be stronger than Grey Knights? GK was the only other Army I had considered way back when, but I don't think there were a lot of models at the time and I guess we're used to supplement a Space Marine army or something.
Just wondering.
For channels I watch, how is Wolf Lord Rho on the green list with "no known opinions" but Auspex Tactics is on the yellow list with "cares only about meta"? Surely these are the same category of "no known opinions, only care about their specific area of fandom?"
Nah, gatekeeping is required. The problem is the left cancels the right, then the right cancels the right to look cool to lefties.For channels I watch, how is Wolf Lord Rho on the green list with "no known opinions" but Auspex Tactics is on the yellow list with "cares only about meta"? Surely these are the same category of "no known opinions, only care about their specific area of fandom?"
Then wtf is going on with the Valrak entry?
Actually though I switched from Wolf Lord Rho to Isander & Koda for lore, but they seem fairly black or gay.
Anyway... this is leftist NPC cancellation shit. People can figure out themselves which channels to watch or not watch.
OK but the list makes no sense?Nah, gatekeeping is required. The problem is the left cancels the right, then the right cancels the right to look cool to lefties.
Some of them are questionable but others seem accurate? Who knows. I don't really consume that content.OK but the list makes no sense?