Weight Loss Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Troll_sl

shitlord
1,703
7
I haven't been tracking calories very precisely (~2000 daily, rough guess), and I'm down to 214 lbs from 243 back in February. Pant size is down to 35, but shirts are still XXL. Feels good.

Oh, and lots of ice cream has been consumed over that time.
Fuck, man. It's a race, now. You've got the lead. I'm at 217.
 

Ossoi

Potato del Grande
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
17,880
8,779
We're not talking about the same thing. I'm talking about people with more than 50+ pounds to lose, you're talking about someone trying to cut down to a low body fat percentage while working out. Different situations. Why?

Insulin sensitivity / resistance makes all the difference in the world. 200g of carbs would completely fuck up someone doing a low carb diet with high insulin resistance..
Did you even read my post again, as I asked you to?

Restricting carbs is necessary for someone overweight (20% bf+), as this will improve their insulin sensitivity. Once they get leaner (e.g closer to 15% bf) then you can reintroduce carbs by carb cycling (higher carbs on weightlifting days, lower carbs on rest days). This is optimal for fat loss and muscle gain.

Once someone is leaner, there is simply no reason to restrict carbs.
We agree that overweight people shouldn't be allowed near carbs.

You keep coming here and banging the carbs are evil, sugar is poison drum.

I am trying to point out that once someone has lost enough weight, there is no reason to restrict carbs.

As for sugar is poison - the fact that fitness sites sell a complete range of high/low GI carbs, completely invalidates that stance.

I'm talking about people with more than 50+ pounds to lose, you're talking about someone trying to cut down to a low body fat percentage while working out. Different situations. Why?
Err having the goal of losing 50lbs is no different to wanting to get from 25% body fat to 12% - the optimal way to do that is going to be lifting weights and watching what you eat - high protein, low carbs until leaner. Even if it's getting from 25% to 15% or from 25% to 10%. The methodology is the same
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,078
19,628
Five minutes on google and it's obvious you're wrong.
USDA
Department of Health and Human Services
Center for Disease Control

I could keep going. None of these trusted sources agree with you.

USDA guidelines.

myplate_blue.jpg


Fruit: High Sugar and Low Fiber
Grains: High Sugar and Low Fiber
Milk: Sugar Water with Fat and Protein
Vegetables: Low Sugar and high fiber
Meat: The good stuff. Fat and Protein.

That's the USDA dietary guidelines. Let's look at some others. Department of "Health" and Human Services

318470_280108588679166_866718609_n.jpg


Jesus, just look at the fucking cover! What do they show off as healthy food? Fruit and Bread!

FRUIT

and

BREAD

That's sugar and fiber.

Center for Disease Control

According to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010, a healthy eating plan:
?Emphasizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fat-free or low-fat milk and milk products(EAT SUGAR WITH FIBER)
?Includes lean meats, poultry, fish, beans, eggs, and nuts
?Is low in saturated fats, trans fats, cholesterol, salt (sodium), and added sugars(FAT IS BAD cut back on extra sugar)
?Stays within your daily calorie needs
I don't think you even know what you're saying at this point
 

Itlan

Blackwing Lair Raider
4,994
744
That would suck although it's not as if having a ripped chest while waiting on the last bit of spare tire to go is much better. Hell, my obliques are clearly visible but that shit hanging out over my stomach is tenacious.
Lol I don't mean I have man tits, just it seems the last bits of fat to be there, as there's clear separation of muscles at the shoulders, arms, my back, legs, etc. When I flex you can see striations in my chest but naturally there's still a little jiggle jiggle at the bottom of the pec. Since changing to a more hypertrophy styled workout its become better, though.
 

Daelos

Guarding the guardians
219
58
Today is... the last day of this years' diet! 10 kgs down in 3 months (96,5->86,5 (at 194cm height)), and I'm looking forward to hitting the gym again next week after upping calorie and carb intake starting tomorrow.

I've always been thin and scrawny, but I'm aesthetically pretty much in the best shape I've ever been at the moment. Looking forward to filling out some now.
PR's before the diet (5RMs); squat @ 105kg, dl @ 125kg, bench @ 77,5kg. I know these are fairly low, so there's plenty of room for improvement (especially now, as I haven't been to the gym for 4-5 weeks)

First goal: 350kg in combined 5RM. Hoping to get there by late November.
 

Itlan

Blackwing Lair Raider
4,994
744
Hey faggot, type that shit in American.

But yeah don't worry about personal numbers. It's all about being better than YOU were yesterday, you're in competition with yourself and no one else.

Once I realized that, I really started to blow up.
 

Daelos

Guarding the guardians
219
58
Hey faggot, type that shit in American.
Oops, sorry. Height-wise, I'm guessing I'm about 67 little pebbles and 3 wooden branches tall, and weight-wise I've dropped approximately the weight of a fat cat, going from a decent sized tree root to the equivalent of about 90 ostrich eggs.
 

McCheese

SW: Sean, CW: Crone, GW: Wizardhawk
6,922
4,325
I'm just happy you didn't use that retarded Stone measurement. Kilograms and centimeters, I don't mind.
 

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
38,366
16,261
You can't just tell people to boycott Gold's Gym without giving a single reason.

That's almost as much of a cocktease as when the news goes "What are you eating everyday that could KILL YOU IN A MATTER OF SECONDS! Find out at 10:00"


I hate watching UFC in England and they use the stone shit, makes no fucking sense.
 

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
Err having the goal of losing 50lbs is no different to wanting to get from 25% body fat to 12% - the optimal way to do that is going to be lifting weights and watching what you eat - high protein, low carbs until leaner. Even if it's getting from 25% to 15% or from 25% to 10%. The methodology is the same
Reversing insulin resistance is a higher priority for those with 50+ lbs to lose. You keep saying it's the same priority at all weight levels when it's not. Giving 200g of carbs to someone with insulin resistance because DEM GAINZ BRO is diet suicide. Diet first, GAINZ second until you get to a healthy body weight.

As for sugar is poison - the fact that fitness sites sell a complete range of high/low GI carbs, completely invalidates that stance.
Do you understand why this is alogical fallacy, or do I have to walk you through it?
 

Itlan

Blackwing Lair Raider
4,994
744
Oops, sorry. Height-wise, I'm guessing I'm about 67 little pebbles and 3 wooden branches tall, and weight-wise I've dropped approximately the weight of a fat cat, going from a decent sized tree root to the equivalent of about 90 ostrich eggs.
You sound really small and really fat.

You'll fit in well here.
 

Qhue

Tranny Chaser
7,646
4,615
I had a massive internal infection and as a result dropped 40 lbs in a little over two weeks and have kept it off, so yeah there are all sorts of ways to lose weight but that does not equate to health.

(Though I will say during the post surgery recovery period my body fat % has steadily decreased so there are still things going on even if the overall mass is constant)
 

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,608
14,348
Did your infection cause you to lose a limb? 40 lbs in two weeks? What the fuck?
 

Ossoi

Potato del Grande
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
17,880
8,779
Reversing insulin resistance is a higher priority for those with 50+ lbs to lose. You keep saying it's the same priority at all weight levels when it's not. Giving 200g of carbs to someone with insulin resistance because DEM GAINZ BRO is diet suicide. Diet first, GAINZ second until you get to a healthy body weight.
Did you even read my post again, as I asked you to?

Restricting carbs is necessary for someone overweight (20% bf+), as this will improve their insulin sensitivity. Once they get leaner (e.g closer to 15% bf) then you can reintroduce carbs by carb cycling (higher carbs on weightlifting days, lower carbs on rest days). This is optimal for fat loss and muscle gain.
Reversing insulin resistance is a higher priority for those with 50+ lbs to lose.You keep saying it's the same priority at all weight levels when it's not.
I don't think Himeo can read.

I have genuinely lost count of how many times I've quoted myself and he still doesn't seem to realise that we both agree that fatties shouldn't go near carbs.

Giving 200g of carbs to someone with insulin resistance because DEM GAINZ BRO is diet suicide.
I said 200g of sweet potato, not 200g of carbs. 200g of sweet potato has 40g carbs.

Honestly, just stop posting. I'm probably one of the posters who was most inclined to partially agree with your stance. I dropped a lot of body fat last year via low carb and then carb cycling, and even now at roughly 10% body fat my carb intake is still low-medium compared to most people, even on training days. Plus I never eat bread or pasta. But having to keep quoting myself because you can't take anything in, is getting frustrating
 

Ossoi

Potato del Grande
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
17,880
8,779
Giving 200g of carbs to someone with insulin resistance because DEM GAINZ BRO is diet suicide. Diet first, GAINZ second until you get to a healthy body weight.
Why are you bashing on wanting to add muscle?

Do you not realise that people with no/little weightlifting experience can burn fat and gain muscle at the same time? Do you really think just burning fat is preferential to burning fat whilst gaining muscle?
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,078
19,628
Fine, explain your point of view.
My point of view isn't too far from yours which is why your crusade is so bizarre.

Cutting carbs is one of the best ways to lose fat. As far as I know nobody in this thread has disputed that. There are people who can diet while still eating carbs, though not as quickly or efficiently and they're ok with that. This is pretty common knowledge and there's no big conspiracy to hide the truth. Also when you're done losing weight there's nothing wrong with a sensible amount of carbs and your body will run much better than being low carb 24/7
 

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
I don't think Himeo can read.

I said 200g of sweet potato, not 200g of carbs. 200g of sweet potato has 40g carbs.
I definitely misread that. Carry on, no disagreement if it's only 40g of carbs.

My point of view isn't too far from yours which is why your crusade is so bizarre.
When I see all this talk about "calories in, calories out" it TRIGGERS me.

But, seriously, implying low carb dieting is common knowledge is flat wrong. When people ask me how I lost all the weight and I tell them, I get shit like "Won't all that fat clog your arteries and kill you?" or "Stop, that's dangerous!" or "You're lying. Just tell me the truth."

Common knowledge is locked in shit science from the 1950's.
 

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,608
14,348
Nobody in this thread says those things about low carb diets because everyone in this thread understands how they work when done properly.