Who the fuck puts Kung Pow on a worst ever list? That movie is fucking awesome! I've thought about this the last day or so, and have changed my worst movie to "The Village." Worst movie ever. I guessed the entire plot within the first ten minutes. M. Night is a piece of crap.Kung Pow.
Seriously? No one metioned this? I stayed until the end but more than half the theatre got up and left.
Seconded. I liked the books so I went to watch it one night after work (was like a Tuesday a bit after it came out)... I wish I didn't. I was actually laughing during the movie at how bad it was. There were only 2 other people in the theater, a mom and her 5ish year old daughter, so I didn't feel like a dick about it.Eregon.
I was about to ask how the hell it could be a ripoff when it came out first, but I prudently decided to look it up first, and saw that it came out in 2006. and Fellowship came out in 2001.eragon was a direct ripoff of the LOTR films and it had some decent effects. not great but watchable.
Haha I saw that.That movie is only bad if you don't find tom greens stupidity to be funny, i found him entertaining back then so i didn't mind it
on topic:
wat?!?!?The Happening was truly terrible and i paid to see that, however i classify that movie as bad good. its really just a weird as fuck movie with some of the most over the top bad acting i have ever seen. it wasnt boring and that lady who just flipped her shit in that cabin was lol worthy along with the dude who blasted the kids through the front door. the hotdog man was especially cheesetastic as well. and lets not forget the phoned in performance from zooey or the goofball marky mark scenes. the only actor who took that role any bit seriously was john leguizamo. he is really an underrated actor who always puts in the effort for his roles. somebody mentioned spawn. spawn is bad, but leguizamo fucking nailed that clown role.
i saw kung pow and eragon on video and neither films are great, but i wasnt offended by them. kung pow i took as a goofy comedy in the vein of dodgeball. eragon was a direct ripoff of the LOTR films and it had some decent effects. not great but watchable.even the prequels while horrible werent so bad you walked out of the theater, i just kept asking myself during phantom menace, why jar jar? why? clone wars and sith, i asked myself. why did lucas turn vader into a little bitch?
Bram Stoker's Dracula is one of those films people either love or hate. I'm in the former camp, though I can see why some hate it.I can usually find something remotely interesting in any movie, but this one was tough:
Also, I'll get a lot of flack for this I'm sure, but taking hot chicks to Brazil was probably one of the worst decisions I've ever made. I've never been a big fan of that kind of humor, and add in the fact that the girls clearly had no interest, and to this day that is one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
Honorable mention to Bram Stoker's Dracula. The scene a few minutes in where they are telling the back story and show Winona Ryder "falling" was almost enough to get us to walk out right there. I'm still not sure how we made it to the end, but I'm guessing titties and Gary Oldman probably helped.
EDIT: I enjoyed Howard the Duck and Wing Commander! Well, more than a lot of shitty movies anyway.
look man, i aint The Edge, the prequels buttraped star wars, but outside of a few things the movies were not unwatchable. i can say i watched all 3 movies at the theater, paid for them and dont feel like i didnt get my money's worth. chancellor palpatine/emperor in return of the sith is pretty fucking awesome. phantom menace had darth sith. clones had...... it had......... ok it didnt have any redeeming quality, but it was still the bridge movie so it needed to be watched!wat?!?!?
I was 14 and already realized how fuckin bad that movie was. Of course the other 2 were no surprise of how atrocious and insulting for the majority of SW fans.
Kung pow is so awful that is good.