At some point though if taken to the extreme and say we replace all artists (including writing) with AI, does AI just train itself off art AI itself creates? SO a computer dictates what is great art, or a great show / movie. How can you train an AI to make Star Wars if there isn't a Star Wars to train itself on. These AI's only work even kinda now because someone used creativity to create the things its learning to create.
If there is no career path or profession for any of it, then people will not focus on creativity at all. There is no more Denis Villeneuve wrote and directed his first four films including the one he got notice for which lead to his standing as the best Sci Fi director living. Why would Tarantino bother writing scripts to things like True Romance if he couldn't get paid and make a lil money to make Reservoir Dogs.
Like hate on the industry all you like, but flat saying of why do we need these people at all is really short sighted. Why would anyone get into the industry to proof a script an AI came up with for $20 an hour or whatever was suggested earlier. At most it should be used to help the process, using it completely it sucks the soul out of work, I come back to that South Park again. The AI trained itself on the entire library of South Park, came up with an ending to an episode and it was fucking lifeless. It's not just that it wasn't funny, cause not all of South Park has been, it just removed Trey and Matt's voices from the show, there was nothing redeeming, no point, nothing even attempting anything original. It wasn't even their humor anymore, which I think is the worst thing about it.
I do find it funny that one of the people saying why do they need these people at all is using a avatar from a show that was pretty fucking original that I struggle to comprehend how an AI would come up with.