Hey, why don't you provide some dates then?
I'm dismissing iron tools because they wouldn't efficiently cut granite blocks. It's a moot point. And yes I totally believe an atlantean trade route was possible if Atlantis actually existed. I also believe the Romans had a global trade route 2500 or so years ago. There is evidence of new world items showing up in old world places such as tobacco, cocaine and maize.So you believe there was an ancient Atlantean trade system running in 10000 BC even though we have no evidence for it?
But you find the Egyptians using the existing trade system that existed between the empires of the Middle East and the Mediterranean to acquire iron tools from the Hittites is not because there is no evidence that they traded iron.
I just want to narrow down what you belive because sometimes I just jump in on attacking it, but even after this post you haven't been clear. I suspect the vagueness is a defence mechanism to maintain distance from Ancient Aliens.the global trade route has nothing to do with carving rocks. its like the other day when Burns was being obtuse about slaves building the pyramids. slaves can do the heavy lifting/moving, but arent very effective at sculpting or placement. as you know very few have that genius ability to cut with such high precision. i dont know if they used acid, i would say, yes because they found surfaces in the sereppeum boxes that are both rough and smooth with a puddling effect at the bottom. so yeah, 100% acid was used in at least some cases. not on that list, but i also believe they had power tools. not electricity. I'm not saying that, but i think they had a water powered system of saws or even drills cutting slabs. no idea what alloys they had, but it was hard enough to cut through granite. or maybe they used acid or something else to soften the stone enough so bronze/copper saws could cut it. there is evidence of cut marks and drill holes in the rocks all over the place.
Obtuse my ass, in just this statement you make it sound like you are saying slaves did all the unskilled labor. Which is moving all the stones around and even rough cutting the huge stone blocks at the quarry for transport. That's 80% of the work of building the pyramids and if slaves did 80%+ of the work, that would mean slaves built the pyramids.the global trade route has nothing to do with carving rocks. its like the other day when Burns was being obtuse about slaves building the pyramids. slaves can do the heavy lifting/moving, but arent very effective at sculpting or placement. as you know very few have that genius ability to cut with such high precision. i dont know if they used acid, i would say, yes because they found surfaces in the sereppeum boxes that are both rough and smooth with a puddling effect at the bottom. so yeah, 100% acid was used in at least some cases. not on that list, but i also believe they had power tools. not electricity. I'm not saying that, but i think they had a water powered system of saws or even drills cutting slabs. no idea what alloys they had, but it was hard enough to cut through granite. or maybe they used acid or something else to soften the stone enough so bronze/copper saws could cut it. there is evidence of cut marks and drill holes in the rocks all over the place.
I was being slightly hyperbolic when I said power tools. But only slightly. They didn't have power tools in our modern sense, but it's my opinion they had saw mills or something similar for cutting granite at an industrial scale. I don't believe in magic or magic concrete. Concrete/cement is old as hell. It's found at gobekli tepe. Acids dhaping and smoothing rock isn't magic either. The ancient egyptians were masters at a lot of things including preserving bodies. They would have intimate knowledge of a lot of different chemical substances including acids.I just want to narrow down what you belive because sometimes I just jump in on attacking it, but even after this post you haven't been clear. I suspect the vagueness is a defence mechanism to maintain distance from Ancient Aliens.
I can 100% get behind limited meteor iron tools that they had some luck alloying to get close to steel strength, but it wasn't available enough to maintain the knowledge until iron became widespread.
I can 100% get behind some sort of waterwheel powered saw or drill using wooden cogs and mechanisms.
I don't think Egyptologists would be closed to either idea, just skeptical given lack of physical evidence and drawings.
I can't get behind magic concrete, levitation and power tools.
Can you detail what exactly you think they had?
The guy driving the cement mixer truck didn't build the empire state building.Obtuse my ass, in just this statement you make it sound like you are saying slaves did all the unskilled labor. Which is moving all the stones around and even rough cutting the huge stone blocks at the quarry for transport. That's 80% of the work of building the pyramids and if slaves did 80%+ of the work, that would mean slaves built the pyramids.
The hell he didn't. The people working on the project are the ones that build it. If 80% of the workers were cement mixer truck drivers, then cement mixer truck drivers built it.The guy driving the cement mixer truck didn't build the empire state building.
How were the tools powered do you think?I was being slightly hyperbolic when I said power tools. But only slightly. They didn't have power tools in our modern sense, but it's my opinion they had saw mills or something similar for cutting granite at an industrial scale. I don't believe in magic or magic concrete. Concrete/cement is old as hell. It's found at gobekli tepe. Acids dhaping and smoothing rock isn't magic either. The ancient egyptians were masters at a lot of things including preserving bodies. They would have intimate knowledge of a lot of different chemical substances including acids.
He sure didn't. The guy pouring cement in the footings helped build it. The guy delivering it just drove a truck. The slaves delivering blocks to the pyramid job site had no hand in constructing the pyramids. They just delivered the blocks. It's like saying Home Depot built your house because they had the forklift carry the wooden beams to your car. The workforce that built the pyramids were primarily paid contractors. The gofers delivering the blocks were a bunch of slaves nobody gave a shit about.The hell he didn't. The people working on the project are the ones that build it. If 80% of the workers were cement mixer truck drivers, then cement mixer truck drivers built it.
What percent of the workforce would you say were slaves?
Water powered. I mentioned this in a previous post. Let me find the video from the history channel show ancient inventions.How were the tools powered do you think?
So, when estimates say if it took 10,000 - 30,000 people to build the pyramids, none of them were slaves?He sure didn't. The guy pouring cement in the footings helped build it. The guy delivering it just drove a truck. The slaves delivering blocks to the pyramid job site had no hand in constructing the pyramids. They just delivered the blocks. It's like saying Home Depot built your house because they had the forklift carry the wooden beams to your car. The workforce that built the pyramids were primarily paid contractors. The gofers delivering the blocks were a bunch of slaves nobody gave a shit about.
They wuz Kangz my man.So, when estimates say if it took 10,000 - 30,000 people to build the pyramids, none of them were slaves?
about 500 paid contractors lived at the village. your numbers mean nothing.So, when estimates say if it took 10,000 - 30,000 people to build the pyramids, none of them were slaves?
So the Undersecretary of the State for the Giza Monuments, Dr. Zahi Hawass is wrong? None of this stuff exists and is all made up?about 500 paid contractors lived at the village. your numbers mean nothing.
zawi hawass......So the Undersecretary of the State for the Giza Monuments, Dr. Zahi Hawass is wrong? None of this stuff exists and is all made up?
This article from 2011 is wrong (can't use modern stuff because it's all woke, right?)?
BBC - History - Ancient History in depth: The Private Lives of the Pyramid-builders
Dr Joyce Tyldesley reveals the people behind some of the world's most famous strictures.www.bbc.co.uk
Right, you have made it clear. You are making up your own shit so you can feel smart/superior in your "knowledge" to people who dedicate their life to studying this stuff. Just like all the other conspiracy nuters. Sorry for not lumping you in with them previous to this, I shall proceed differently in the future.zawi hawass......
btw i'm going to keep repeating the same things to you because if i repeat them enough you may get the message. lets see how long that takes.