Loser Araysar
Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
- 80,117
- 160,217
you mean blacks that HAVE TO be nice and deferential to them because they rely on them for their paycheck?
Australian in U.S. on baseball scholarship murdered by teens because they were bored
- Thread starter Qhue
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Shooting random white people for gang initiation might be the dumbest fucking thing ever. The police care when white people get shot.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/chris-la...822-2sdud.html
http://www.smh.com.au/world/chris-la...822-2sdud.html
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
Well, its funny that you mention this, because if you reverse it (a white person must be black to have a legitimate opinion on black culture otherwise they're RACIST) what you have is exactly what you're doing to everyone in this thread who dares to point out the race angle in this case, and the hypocrisy of the media's handling of this case in the context of the Zimmerman/Martin case.
See is that not racist to suggest that the only reason I'd have a positive relationship with black people specifically is because they rely on me for money? Let me guess, it's not racist because it'sTRUE.
Nope I haven't done that once, and I haven't offered my opinion on "black culture" as you are using it. You shouldn't be surprised to find I have the same opinion on the teens mentioned in this incident as you do, it's not strictly the opinion on the incident I have problem with.
Are you saying that's the only way I could have the opinion I do about this forum and this thread?
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
Yeah, its pretty much your entire argument
Here you explain to me how you're NOT saying that with this post
I can see how you are getting tripped up, but there is a difference between someone having an opinion about the black youth in the news story and others like them and taking an opportunity to start a thread and circle jerk about how you are right about them.
The difference is present in my posting in this thread vs most others, because as I said I have no love for "black culture" these youths represent. Having said that, I do also appreciate a difference between a misled youth and a symptomatic problem perpetrated solely on the basis of skin color. Most people aren't overt enough to say something absurd like "black people are inherently flawed", but "see here's another example that shows I'm right" serves the same purpose.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Not at all, Adebisibro. What rustles my jimmies is racism apologists. I take a very simple stance (that racism has a negative effect on society as a whole and is not a trait to be defended or championed), and people repeatedly misinterpret that as me pushing "white guilt" or some such nonsense. It would be one thing if I could pass it off as harmless trolling, but this is actually what a lot of people believe. It boggles my mind how consistently and repeatedly people are able to twist and misinterpret the things I say into something that couldn't be less related.
I could write an essay on how harmful thug culture is to society. I could have an hours-long discussion about what circumstances led these kids to commit such a horrific and inexcusable action. I could talk about everyone being responsible for their own personal choices and actions until I'm blue in the face, but it wouldn't matter. Saying "racism is part of the problem" erases all of that and somehow implies that I'm portraying black people as victims and white people as demons and oppressors (which is complete bullshit). A bunch of you guys don't read what I write, you read whatyou thinkI'm writing, which is almost always wrong regardless of how clear I'm being. Best possible example is Hodj. He's had me on ignore for over a month, and yet he still thinks he has some kind of authority to make claims about what I stand for. I would be offended if it weren't so overwhelmingly pathetic. It's not me who's the "delicate" one here.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,931
- 138,215
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
Here's my problem with this comment. The guy who made this thread Qhue doesn't seem to have created it for any of those reasons.
I dunno he can come in here and defend himself its not my job to do it for him, but reading his post, I really don't get how you think he was creating this thread so he and others could
Now, I am making an assumption or two about what you are saying. Are you saying that this thread was made by Qhue solely so that he, and other "racists" could sit around saying "N gonna N" and "Oh man, we're so right about blacks being sub human savages!"?
Because it seems like that's basically what you're saying, but yet I don't see anything in Qhue's post which would lead me to think that was his intention on making this thread.
Rather what I see is him saying
Which was accurate at the time of posting, and then he pointed out that, while US media was ignoring the story, it was getting lots of headlines in other nations and on the internet, also true at the time of posting. That seems to be his sole intent. To start a thread on a controversial event that was apparently making a firestorm internationally but being ignored by our national media.
So, my point: Can you please explain to me where you are getting your conclusion that this thread exists solely as a circle jerk of anti black racism from Qhue's post?
In point of fact, Qhue's original post starting this thread is his only post in the thread as far as I can tell from the past 3 pages and the first 4, so unless he slipped one in on the one page I didn't check so far, I'd say its a far stretch to say this thread was created and exists solely for whites to circle jerk themselves into a frenzy over how much better they are than blacks.
Yes, it was. I don't know if it started on this forum or one of it's previous incarnations, but there was a bandwagon of misled support for him without any knowledge of the facts surrounding the case at the beginning that I found distasteful. If the copy of the original thread was still alive, I believe we'd have evidence of me saying as such.
Hodj I'm not going to play the game where we cotton pick quotes and say "see nothing here" without context or recognition of inferences made.
fanaskin
Well known agitator
- 55,931
- 138,215