Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,133
160,299
Sweetheart, why dont you leave the science talk to the men and go make me another cup of coffee.
 

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
28,957
79,442
It is not as absurd as saying you can distinguish and separate human biologically-driven behaviors from socially-driven behaviors without looking to other primates.
Hey, I agree! So let's start by not pretending like we know what is socially driven and what is biologically driven and acting like that there is no dispute and that all of this is bedrock science when what we are doing is comparing two species that have been on a different evolutionary path for millions of years and that requires going back multiple major ancestors to find the common monkey-lemur we all sprouted from!

BECAUSE IT'S NOT FUCKING FACT, IT'S BEST GUESSES BASED ON COMPARISONS TO AN ANIMAL THAT WE'VE BEEN DIVERGENT FROM FOR UNTOLDMILLIONSOF YEARS

Why don't you just take your bachelors of the arts off the wall and burn it.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,197
23,355
Question.. you keep mentioning how instincts have slowly disappeared with the advancement of language. Can u give a concrete example, about an instinct that was present in early human populations, but no longer exist in modern times?
This all started from lendarios asking a retarded and unanswerable question.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,197
23,355
BECAUSE IT'S NOT FUCKING FACT, IT'S BEST GUESSES BASED ON COMPARISONS TO AN ANIMAL THAT WE'VE BEEN DIVERGENT FROM FOR UNTOLDMILLIONSOF YEARS.
That's A LOT better than making guesses based on what object a fucking 1-day-old looked at funny, when they were probably just responding to the expectations of the experimenter.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,133
160,299
That's A LOT better than making guesses based on what object a fucking 1-day-old looked at funny, when they were probably just responding to the expectations of the experimenter.
And drowning is better than burning alive.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,133
160,299
And people wonder why women are under represented in science.

This is why.
 

rhinohelix

Dental Dammer
<Gold Donor>
3,037
5,004
Or I happen to be a research psychologist and know more about these subjects than random trolls on an internet titty-posting forum.

Seriously, it's a bunch of people arguing about psychology and statistics with someone who is a psychologist and a statistician. I didn't make Cad cite specific case-law every time he made a legal opinion.
Education doesn't prevent willful ignorance and your C.V., whatever that is, doesn't mean you aren't both wholly wrong and terrible at argumentation. Get a refund on your degrees.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,197
23,355
And drowning is better than burning alive.
Except the evidence in your 'great documentary' is one study about what object a fucking 1-day-old looked at funny, and the other one is a study showing parallels across other cultures and saying that because something is parallel across cultures it must be biological, which is just a fucking ridiculous assumption. The phrase correlation does not imply causation needs to be rammed into the guy's head with a god damn mallet. He did not show any actual biological evidence yet he makes such a ridiculous claim.