Hey, I agree! So let's start by not pretending like we know what is socially driven and what is biologically driven and acting like that there is no dispute and that all of this is bedrock science when what we are doing is comparing two species that have been on a different evolutionary path for millions of years and that requires going back multiple major ancestors to find the common monkey-lemur we all sprouted from!It is not as absurd as saying you can distinguish and separate human biologically-driven behaviors from socially-driven behaviors without looking to other primates.
What I find ironic is she has thread after thread attacked the worthlessness of college, and in particular the college that she works at, only to now use it as a basis for her authority.How ironic is it that she doesn't know how to science?
This all started from lendarios asking a retarded and unanswerable question.Question.. you keep mentioning how instincts have slowly disappeared with the advancement of language. Can u give a concrete example, about an instinct that was present in early human populations, but no longer exist in modern times?
We have no real way of knowing what instincts pre-civilization humans had, or evolutionary-link era humanoids.
I wish there was a good way to make this an avatar while preserving context.But we do know what instincts the primates we evolved from had.
....you realize why he asked it, right? And you realize what you're saying about your own argument right in this very quote, right?This all started from lendarios asking a retarded and unanswerable question.
That's A LOT better than making guesses based on what object a fucking 1-day-old looked at funny, when they were probably just responding to the expectations of the experimenter.BECAUSE IT'S NOT FUCKING FACT, IT'S BEST GUESSES BASED ON COMPARISONS TO AN ANIMAL THAT WE'VE BEEN DIVERGENT FROM FOR UNTOLDMILLIONSOF YEARS.
And drowning is better than burning alive.That's A LOT better than making guesses based on what object a fucking 1-day-old looked at funny, when they were probably just responding to the expectations of the experimenter.
Hey, we know one in Cinci that will hook you up for $50 an hour on sale!That guy can go fuck himself. Older women are sexy.
Education doesn't prevent willful ignorance and your C.V., whatever that is, doesn't mean you aren't both wholly wrong and terrible at argumentation. Get a refund on your degrees.Or I happen to be a research psychologist and know more about these subjects than random trolls on an internet titty-posting forum.
Seriously, it's a bunch of people arguing about psychology and statistics with someone who is a psychologist and a statistician. I didn't make Cad cite specific case-law every time he made a legal opinion.
Except the evidence in your 'great documentary' is one study about what object a fucking 1-day-old looked at funny, and the other one is a study showing parallels across other cultures and saying that because something is parallel across cultures it must be biological, which is just a fucking ridiculous assumption. The phrase correlation does not imply causation needs to be rammed into the guy's head with a god damn mallet. He did not show any actual biological evidence yet he makes such a ridiculous claim.And drowning is better than burning alive.