Why do you keep quoting the same statistics from the same flawed methodology?This must be what it's like arguing with a climate denier.
We have the opposite of a hockey stick here:
And we have the rape equivalent of the IPCC admitting that rapes have declined by two-thirds even as rape reporting has improved by 35% and yet we have these hardcore bluehair RAPE-CRISIS peddlers opportunistically screeching "RAPE EPIDEMIC".
I don't think there's a rape epidemic, but if more stats with good methodology come out pointing in that direction, I could definitely be convinced of it.Just admit to yourself that you are in no way at all rational about this subject. You use all the excuses you can that allows you to believe in the 'rape epidemic' and then spend days and days crying about how much it sucks having a vagina and men are bad.
Whatproofdo we have that they're going down? The self-report surveys that agree with you or the self-report surveys that don't?Well, I still think it is perfectly rational to argue that this number is still too high.
However, arguing that rapes aren't going down is just batshit.
I don't think there's a rape epidemic..
You keep quoting data from the same 1 bullshit government study with terrible methodology.See? That wasn't so hard, was it? I'm glad I was able to clear that up for you.
Now that you know you'reand belong to the statistically-least-likely-to-be-raped generation of women in human history, maybe you can find a frat party to chill out at.
I am being rational.The only survey that I have disagreed with is the bullshit one you previously brought up, from exactly one college where they won't even release the name, with numbers wildly outside of anything else. Which btw, even you said the numbers were insane and probably couldn't be extrapolated to anything else.
So basically, calm down and try for once to be rational on this subject.
Dude, nothing is more embarrassing than you claiming the government is good at collecting data, from self-report survey interviews conducted by people in the same intellectual range of TSA/census/ACORN workers.But after all the effort Mist has put into burying those embarassing stats back a couple pages, bringing them up again is literally forum-rape.
Not true; claiming the UN was reliable at collecting any sort of useful data from its member states would've been more embarrassing.Dude, nothing is more embarrassing than you claiming the government is good at collecting data, from self-report survey interviews conducted by people in the same intellectual range of TSA/census/ACORN workers.
Income inequality influences internet porn access tho:Someone should post two graphs sides by side, the first, the declining rape statistics graph. Next, the growth in income inequality over the past two decades.
Not that these two things have anything to do with one another, but it would still be funny to pretend they do. The less rapes, the more income inequality! Fix the economy, rape someone!
UN_sl said:the adjusted per-capita victimization rate of rape has declined from about 2.4 per 1000 people (age 12 and above) in 1980 (that is, 2.4 persons from each 1000 people 12 and older were raped during that year) to about 0.4 per 1000 people,a decline of about 85%.There are several possible explanations for this, including stricter laws, education on security for women,and a correlation with the rise in Internet pornography.
Okay, so you admit you have no idea of knowing whether there's a rape epidemic or not, and any statement to the contrary is 100% founded on "feels."You realize thats kind of the problem with "rape", right? Some crimes are extremely evident and require no analysis, like finding a body in the street riddled with bullet holes, that would obviously be a murder.
Rape? Whats rape? Being intoxicated while having sex? Being pressured into having sex? Having sex then regretting or thinking you were coerced? Tricking someone into having sex? Physically forcing someone to have sex? What about rough sex?