It wasn't until the century that women were able to choose who they marry. And in fact in many cultures nowadays they still don't choose who they marry. Prior to 18th century, most marriages were arraigned marriages. Is your point that male penis grew exponentially in the last 200 years? Or like usual you don't have a point and are just a retard?
So, like I said, you would "grit your teeth" and accept the consequences of your friend's actions because you willingly got drunk. That doesn't mean you weren't coerced, by the way. You just put yourself in a position where you were more susceptible to coercion. Maybe to you having your car smashed up is just an "Oops, what was I thinking?" thing, but like I also said, a line has to exist where it's no longer OK to take advantage of someone who's drunk. Luckily, we already have at least 2 reasonable situations where such is the case:
That doesn't imply rape as the norm, it merely implies that women were promiscuous. All the evidence we have about humans and primate societies and mating patterns tends towards the conclusion that rape was always considered antisocial behavior and that the males would gang up and remove/punish/kill males who were too rapey. Among their own tribe anyway. The enemy tribe's women were obviously completely fair game, and that's likely to be the main situation where that specific evolutionary trait you mentioned was beneficial, gang rapes after conquering.
That's a step too far. Not in the moral indignation way, in the "that's straight dumb" way.
The All rape, all the time model is just not supported by analysis of precivilization humans or of primates. Among primates, most sexual encounters are one-on-one encounters of the female's choosing among males competing for her attention, and rapes are generally only the last resort of the least desirable males. If those least desirable males keep it up, they get beaten or killed.
I'm talking about the christian re-interpretation of Lucretia's rape and I'll toss you another hint: Islam came after Christianity and was informed by christian beliefs.
Can you please paste the definition of compel?
Your 'all rape, all the time' viewpoint is dangerously similar to uninformed extreme feminist views that all sex is rape and always was...
pre-civilization women never had a choice on who to mate. It was always the alpha male of the group who had first pick, and then the beta males.
That's not how primates mate. It's a popular belief of how things work, but it's not supported by science.
When did we switch from coerce to compel? When someone is in a susceptible state (ie: drunk), it is significantly easier to convince them to do things they would normally not agree to do. Just because you are aware of this when you drink, it doesn't give the rest of the world carte blanche to take advantage of your state to, for example, get you to sign a contract or, alternatively, to fuck you.
Actually in terms of primates. there is only one group where the women chooses without concecuences.
now chimpanzees
And from sexual coersion in wiki
Someone named tanoomba highlighted compel to explain his use of the word coerce. You may want to talk to him about that.
