It's funny that you completely ignore the posts providing evidence that Michael Jackson successfully, and overwhelmingly as far as the law is concerned, rebutted the accusations against him. While the accusations against Cosby to this point are pretty damning, you are wrong about MJ and continuing to equate the two situations make you look like a fucking idiot.Both sound pretty bad to me. Its basically the exact same thing, except MJ liked little boys and Cosbro likes young women passed out in his rape mansion.
I'd say the consistency with the pattern of behavior set forth by the accusers is the damning part. It was the same way with MJ, though, until that case went to court and all the accusers' stories started becoming jumbled when under interrogation. In any case, I'm still waiting for some kind of concrete evidence against Cosby. Hell, even some not-so-concrete evidence would be more than we have now.Why are the accusations against Cosby pretty damning?
Yes, any evidence at all would indeed be more than the absolutely zero evidence we have now.I'd say the consistency with the pattern of behavior set forth by the accusers is the damning part. It was the same way with MJ, though, until that case went to court and all the accusers' stories started becoming jumbled when under interrogation. In any case, I'm still waiting for some kind of concrete evidence against Cosby. Hell, even some not-so-concrete evidence would be more than we have now.
These are the thoughts of a person who is not drunk.
I remember two times in college that I brought a girl back and pulled up when I realized she was REALLY drunk. It seemed like the right thing to do. One was so wasted she threw up several times that night, and was absolutely baffled as to why I didn't fuck her when she woke up the next day. So... my loss, I guess?you've obviously never picked up a girl from a bar
I'd think a good policy to have followed in the first place would be not trying to bang a woman who is already plastered to the point she's throwing up.I remember two times in college that I brought a girl back and pulled up when I realized she was REALLY drunk. It seemed like the right thing to do. One was so wasted she threw up several times that night, and was absolutely baffled as to why I didn't fuck her when she woke up the next day. So... my loss, I guess?
Still seems like a decent policy to not fuck slurry drunk girls you aren't dating. Though apparently, with current feminist thinking, a notarized Chappelle Love Contract is the only way to go.
That was (presumably) the point of the satirical article, yes. But when that spawns groups of posts that make fun of a group for something they never said and don't believe, the point is lost. Not to mention that people who do that are just as guilty of screwing up the definition of "rape" as the people they are criticizing. Apparently it's terrible when feminists detract from the seriousness of actual rape, but it's totally OK to do it for a laugh when mocking them. That's intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy all rolled into one.Yes, Tanoomba, everyone knows the fart rape was satirical, but the point was how ridiculous the "rape culture" warriors have gotten. Way to let that sail over your head as per usual.
We were at a party. We started talking when we were sober. We left buzzed~drunk. My guess is she had a couple of stronger drinks before we left, and they caught up to her when we got back. I don't know, I wasn't monitoring her drinking closely. When I noticed she was kind of slurry and not completely there, I suggested we sleep it off instead. She got sick after that.I'd think a good policy to have followed in the first place would be not trying to bang a woman who is already plastered to the point she's throwing up.
Are you being daft on purpose or are you actually stupid? Please keep trying to put the burden back on everyone to prove innocence, what a fucking cunt move. What evidence do I require? How about more than fucking zero you dick.You do realise that rape is a notoriously difficult crime to prove/convict?
And you do realise the women are coming forward with historical accusations?
What evidence do you require? A hidden camera?
Maybe the skanks that went back for 2nds could have kept 1 of the pills he handed them instead of swallowing everything everytime.You do realise that rape is a notoriously difficult crime to prove/convict?
And you do realise the women are coming forward with historical accusations?
What evidence do you require? A hidden camera?