Dr. Cliff Huxtable was a mega rapist

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,141
214,428
Why do you guys talk to Tanoomba? Every time I see one of his posts in these threads I know it's time to skip the next couple pages.
this, its so obvious he baits posters here and the same ones keep coming back to, i dunno try to counter an argument he never made because he doesnt actually say anything definitive.
 

Agraza

Registered Hutt
6,890
521
I pretty much skip his posts. I throw out lazy quips if they're timely. /shrug I don't even understand how someone gets like that.

Sometimes this floats through my head when I see one of his posts.



Without the desire to death touch him, obviously.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,657
It really is simple though. Substitute in a non-sex crime (que tanoomba lecturing us on how rape isn't a sex crime) and have 15 people accuse him of that instead.

The argument over did he / didn't he completely changes. And it shouldn't.

Those Duke boys didn't really rape that girl either. And holy crap, there was no reason tofeelsthat they didn't. Everyone can agree that pretentious, entitled, fake ivy league college lacrosse players are most likely shitty human beings.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,821
50,675
It seems unlikely that there would be no evidence at all, but what do I know about decades long serial rape campaigns.

It also seems unlikely that there would be a campaign against him, but I suppose that kind of thing can happen.
At this point, its doubtful there's even evidence they had sex, much less evidence of drugging. That sort of thing can be hard to prove unless you jump on it quickly because the drugs will leave your system. Which sucks, because it's a despicable crime.

I don't think shakedowns of celebrities are uncommon; but I have no evidence of such so I shouldn't put it forward as likely. It's just a possibility.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
It really is simple though. Substitute in a non-sex crime (que tanoomba lecturing us on how rape isn't a sex crime) and have 15 people accuse him of that instead.

The argument over did he / didn't he completely changes. And it shouldn't.
What do you mean the argument completely changes? If 15 people who have no reason to lie tell me they saw Bill Cosby do a hit and run, or Bill Cosby shoplifting, or Bill Cosby doing a line of cocaine off a park bench, I'm going to strongly suspect that Bill Cosby did just those things. Why are you trying to say that the standard is different because we're talking about a sex crime?
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,215
What do you mean the argument completely changes? If 15 people who have no reason to lie tell me they saw Bill Cosby do a hit and run, or Bill Cosby shoplifting, or Bill Cosby doing a line of cocaine off a park bench, I'm going to strongly suspect that Bill Cosby did just those things. Why are you trying to say that the standard is different because we're talking about a sex crime?
rrr_img_83158.jpg
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,926
52,682
If 15 people who have no reason to tell the truth tell me they saw Bill Cosby do a hit and run, or Bill Cosby shoplifting, or Bill Cosby doing a line of cocaine off a park bench, I'm going to not form a strong opinion one way or the other that Bill Cosby did just those things.

Or better yet, Bill Cosby had no reason to rape anyone, so why would Bill Cosby rape anyone?
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,215
My uncle met Bill Cosby last year. He looked at him and said "the belt will wail tonight" and Cosby started laughing and invited him to his table and they talked for 10 minutes. He did not rape my uncle.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,821
50,675
What do you mean the argument completely changes? If 15 people who have no reason to lie tell me they saw Bill Cosby do a hit and run, or Bill Cosby shoplifting, or Bill Cosby doing a line of cocaine off a park bench, I'm going to strongly suspect that Bill Cosby did just those things. Why are you trying to say that the standard is different because we're talking about a sex crime?
Strongly suspecting something is fine, and reasonable under the circumstances. Convicting them of any crime is a different matter. I don't know if you suggested he be charged or convicted of anything, just wanted to clear that up.
 

Nester

Vyemm Raider
4,980
3,185
What do you mean the argument completely changes? If 15 people who have no reason to lie tell me they saw Bill Cosby do a hit and run, or Bill Cosby shoplifting, or Bill Cosby doing a line of cocaine off a park bench, I'm going to strongly suspect that Bill Cosby did just those things. Why are you trying to say that the standard is different because we're talking about a sex crime?
The standard is different becouse the only "eye wittness testimony" is from the accusers. The example you are giving indicate independent witness with no connection to the crime.

I am not trying to downplay the fact that 15 people have come forward, that is a lot and in my mind carries weight, but your example is wrong for the reason i stated. The witness in this case are not independant, they have a dog in the fight.
 

Ossoi

Potato del Grande
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
17,879
8,779
Or better yet, Bill Cosby had no reason to rape anyone, so why would Bill Cosby rape anyone?
Stupidest reply yet.

No rapist has any reason to rape anyone, doesn't stop them though.

Jimmy Savile got away with sex offences for over 40 years. There were consistent rumours he liked kids, which he always denied. Just looking at pics of him and it should've been obvious.

As I said earlier, if he can get away with it for so long, there's no reason Cosby can't
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,141
214,428
Stupidest reply yet.

No rapist has any reason to rape anyone, doesn't stop them though.

Jimmy Savile got away with sex offences for over 40 years. There were consistent rumours he liked kids, which he always denied. Just looking at pics of him and it should've been obvious.

As I said earlier, if he can get away with it for so long, there's no reason Cosby can't
its always enlightening watching someone compare grown women to small children
 

LiquidDeath

Magnus Deadlift the Fucktiger
5,071
12,007
Stupidest reply yet.

No rapist has any reason to rape anyone, doesn't stop them though.

Jimmy Savile got away with sex offences for over 40 years. There were consistent rumours he liked kids, which he always denied. Just looking at pics of him and it should've been obvious.

As I said earlier, if he can get away with it for so long, there's no reason Cosby can't
Goddamn.

This is a scary fucking post.

Just look at pics of him and it should've been obvious? Get the fuck out of here.
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,141
214,428
As for jimmy savile, did these allegations come out after he died and so was unable to sue them for defamation?
 

Adebisi

Clump of Cells
<Silver Donator>
27,744
32,848
Wonder what other rapists we can identify just by looking at them?

Steve Buscemi, say it ain't so!
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,926
52,682
Stupidest reply yet.

No rapist has any reason to rape anyone, doesn't stop them though.

Jimmy Savile got away with sex offences for over 40 years. There were consistent rumours he liked kids, which he always denied. Just looking at pics of him and it should've been obvious.

As I said earlier, if he can get away with it for so long, there's no reason Cosby can't
My point, which obviously escaped a stupid fucking mongoloid like you, is that saying 'they have no reason to lie' is every bit as stupid as me saying 'he had no reason to rape'