Messiah and Children are both after Dune and before GEoD. Both are fine books, but books 1 and 4 are definitely the peak of the series for most people, myself included.Thanks nu_11, that actually makes sense.
I should read the book, I just dont want to have to read Children and isnt there another book before GEOD? I read Dune so I would have to read 2 more books before I get to God Emperor.
So prescience, or the ability to avoid its effects was the most crucial plot point of GEOD?
And his tyrant behavior consisted of forcing humanity to stagnate and regress?
I was just interested in the character as he seems so utterly ridiculous, yet many people respect him as a protagonist, and interestingly, also the antagonist.
Also, does the Golden Path include subjugating humanity for 3500 years before ensuring their survival?
Couldnt of Leto II just fucking killed himself instead of going through all of the trouble with taking over breeding programs and creating a one of a kind non prescient to kill him to ensure the golden path?
Thanks nu_11, that actually makes sense.
I should read the book, I just dont want to have to read Children and isnt there another book before GEOD? I read Dune so I would have to read 2 more books before I get to God Emperor.
Thanks nu_11, that actually makes sense.
I should read the book, I just dont want to have to read Children and isnt there another book before GEOD? I read Dune so I would have to read 2 more books before I get to God Emperor.
View attachment 378496
Option 4 is what i'd suggest, but at the very least you should read the first book and avoid all the shit that frank didn't write
Messiah is short and wraps up Paul's story. Children is good, but it's really the set up for God Emperor. Option 3 is what I'd encourage everyone to try.
Option 5 doesn't exist.
YesSo prescience, or the ability to avoid its effects was the most crucial plot point of GEOD?
And his tyrant behavior consisted of forcing humanity to stagnate and regress?
I was just interested in the character as he seems so utterly ridiculous, yet many people respect him as a protagonist, and interestingly, also the antagonist.
Also, does the Golden Path include subjugating humanity for 3500 years before ensuring their survival?
Couldnt of Leto II just fucking killed himself instead of going through all of the trouble with taking over breeding programs and creating a one of a kind non prescient to kill him to ensure the golden path?
Anyone who thinks of Timothee Chalamet as frail needs to go to Netflix right now and watch "The King" with Joel Edgerton. Chalamet is thin but after seeing his performance as "Hal"/Henry V in that, with his version of the St. Crispin's Day speech, I don't think of him as frail in the slightest. If your only exposure to him is as a gay kid in the "Call me by your name" or whatever movie, he's an actor: That's what he does. And he is a great fucking actor. Don't misinterpret his thinness for weakness.It was ok, liked some of it, didn't like a significant amount.
Things like altering Lady Jessica seducing the guards with the voice, which would be a natural extension and make sense given it's a female power.
Fight scenes were pretty dumb, I know there's the whole shield thing, and moving the blade slowly, but I swear with each movie progression, its just broadcasting how men forget more and more how to fight.
The protagonist, poor casting. When he's talking about how to walk on the sand, I was almost convinced he was setting up a bit, because he sounded so unconvincing.
To frail, just so frail that's its not reasonable to think he could survive the desert, let alone fight, they also didn't bother talking about how he was being secretly trained as a Mentat in the Gurney Halleck scene.
Shit I'm pretty sure Shadout Mapes sheathed the Kris Knife without drawing blood, what the fuck?
So I should watch him act in another movie and somehow he will become stronger.Anyone who thinks of Timothee Chalumet as frail needs to go to Netflix right now and watch "The King" with Joel Edgerton. Chalumet is thin but after seeing his performance as Henry V in that, with is version of the St. Crispin's Day speech, I don't think of him as frail in the slightest. If your only exposure to him is as a gay kid in the "Call me by your name" or whatever movie, he's an actor: That's what he does. And he is a great fucking actor. Don't misinterpret his thinness for weakness.
I didn't think much of him until I accidently came across "The King" and watched it. That's when I got excited about his choice as Paul. I am huge fan now.
In a world where melee combat plays a significant role, uh yea...He's definitely a little frail.Anyone who thinks of Timothee Chalamet as frail needs to go to Netflix right now and watch "The King" with Joel Edgerton. Chalamet is thin but after seeing his performance as "Hal"/Henry V in that, with his version of the St. Crispin's Day speech, I don't think of him as frail in the slightest. If your only exposure to him is as a gay kid in the "Call me by your name" or whatever movie, he's an actor: That's what he does. And he is a great fucking actor. Don't misinterpret his thinness for weakness.
I didn't think much of him until I accidently came across "The King" and watched it. That's when I got excited about his choice as Paul. I am huge fan now.
Its less violent than MaleficientI just read the book with my 13 year old. Is the movie appropriate to take him to? He really wants to see it. I generally am pretty lax about what my kids see, so this is likely okay, right?
maybe if your head wasn't so far up your ass you'd at least give that poor kid a chance!I strangle people for a hobby, and he is literally smaller than the teenager who I routinely allow to attempt to rip my my head off every other class, but can’t because he’s got such useless fucking tooth pick arms, that would buckle before he achieved anything of merit, not for a lack trying.
To me the prescience is the most interesting aspect. It was a deep exploration of how seeing the future could limit us, and how it could be used to ensure our survival. I don't see the solution that Leto came up with as an arbitrary plot device, but as a sincere statement about a possible best strategy for the survival of the species.So prescience, or the ability to avoid its effects was the most crucial plot point of GEOD?
And his tyrant behavior consisted of forcing humanity to stagnate and regress?
I was just interested in the character as he seems so utterly ridiculous, yet many people respect him as a protagonist, and interestingly, also the antagonist.
Also, does the Golden Path include subjugating humanity for 3500 years before ensuring their survival?
Couldnt of Leto II just fucking killed himself instead of going through all of the trouble with taking over breeding programs and creating a one of a kind non prescient to kill him to ensure the golden path?
To be an aloof and brooding teen?maybe if your head wasn't so far up your ass you'd at least give that poor kid a chance!