This was always going to be the case though. They aren't going to be able to expound on every detail in 1k page books in 10 episodes (even 20 when they break a book up into multiple seasons, which they really did cover more than just ASoS the last 2 seasons). It's just inevitable. The show also isn't shown from a single character per chapter point of view either, so we're going to see some things much differently, and get some new reveals along the way since Martin effectively can use the show to turn aspects of the story towards whatever endgame he has planned much earlier than we might have seen in the books.I think we can all agree the changes in GoT are snowballing.
Good for you? My posts weren't in response to yours???? So congrats, I guess on reading GoT before I heard of it in time to catch up for the second book. You are the man.What is pure comedy gold is bookpuristfuck dumbfucks like you acting like we haven't read the books. Dude, I read these books before you even heard of them. So fuck right off.
Yes, there are changes in this adaptation, but you are pants-on-head retarded if you can't see how much effort has been put into adapting the show. Watch a production video, read pretty much any interview from the producers. The effort they put in, with a budget absolutely dwarfed by the LOTR, is amazing.
Man, you really are fucking stupid. 6 hours vs 40 hours.Oh, their budget after four seasons has not been, "dwarfed" by the original LotR budget. Its estimated the first season cost between 50-60 million to produce, and even if you assume their success hasn't led to increased budgets for seasons 2 through 4, you are talking about a budget of between 200-240 million to adapt, roughly, the first three books . By comparison, the original LotR budget (adapting 3 books) is estimated at 280 million. Not a huge difference...certainly not "dwarfed" difference.
Ahhhh, the often quoted "budget per hour" statistic.Man, you really are fucking stupid. 6 hours vs 40 hours.
For season 4, they had $60 million. I do not know how much of an increase that was from previous seasons.Do we know what level of budgets both franchises got? It's tough to say who did better. I definitely enjoy GoT more than lotr though.
Haha, yup. Dude gave them a free Miss Cleo session and told them whats what.I'll tell you one thing: Davos looks like a fucking PIMP now that Tywin is gone, after what he said to the guys of the Iron Bank about backing Stannis.
GoT has more boobs, better dwarves an no faggot elves to inspire names for millions of huntards. There is no comparison.Oh shit, nerds arguing the accuracy LoTR vs ASoIAF, this oughta be good. Almost as good as Star Wars vs Star Trek.
Mind posting a link to the full size of that?So, the Game of Thrones adaptions started very faithful but there is an exponential trend as the seasons pass for variance. This trend doesn't bode well for the future of the show (if you care about faithfulness which admittedly, not everyone will.)
It showed up full screen on mine but attachments can be weird, here is an imgur link:http://i.imgur.com/lceExOP.jpgMind posting a link to the full size of that?
fixed that for youAs for the changes, I don't see how any sane person that has actually read both book series could conclude that GOT is a MUCH MORE accurate adaptation. GoT has madesweepingthematic changes to main plot points and characterizations, omitted large and significant portions of the story, and completely changed the way critical events occur and are resolved.