Never change.Nobody cares what your relatives think they think is true.
Never change.Nobody cares what your relatives think they think is true.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010; 111th Congress H.R. 3590) - GovTrack.uscitation needed, only person you could consider was the lady on the senate committee to bring the bill to a vote.
What wasnt working about it. Illegals get free hc and people who run the system get free healthcare.... Now they get free hc and people who dont need any healthcare are paying an extra monthly bill and a penalty that increases in 3 years to 700$ a year for not being sick....And yet a whole bunch of people with rather significantly more education than 2nd grade say differently. But I guess any conservative will tell you that school past that point is all just fancy book learnin liberal lies.
The old way wasn't working. Comparing our quality of health care to the rest of the developed world should prove that to anyone with a functioning brain.
Are there better methods than the ACA? Of course there are. Would they get past Congress? No.
Americans pay a shitload more for healthcare than the citizens of other countries and yet still have worse health outcomes.What wasnt working about it.
^What wasnt working about it. Illegals get free hc and people who run the system get free healthcare.... Now they get free hc and people who dont need any healthcare are paying an extra monthly bill and a penalty that increases in 3 years to 700$ a year for not being sick....
Technically before ANYONE who wanted free healthcare got free healthcare.What wasnt working about it. Illegals get free hc and people who run the system get free healthcare.... Now they get free hc and people who dont need any healthcare are paying an extra monthly bill and a penalty that increases in 3 years to 700$ a year for not being sick....
Likely true, especially in Arizona where sedated illegals have been deported while under sedation. But regardless of "why" the figures show that they're a drop in the bucket to the getting free healthcare equation unless you start counting clinics which aren't really tracked to my knowledge.It's my understanding illegals are mostly scared to take advantage of that because of the fear of getting deported.
So we need more government to step in and mandate we do things differently. I do believe the free market would solve that problem. Instead we are going to be supervised by a bunch pf politians in suits. Greeeeeat idea!Americans pay a shitload more for healthcare than the citizens of other countries and yet still have worse health outcomes.
In the particular case of healthcare, yes. Healthcare is a public good, and is one of the primary reasons to even have a government. Other western countries are providing their citizens with better healthcare for less money, and they are not doing it with "less government."So we need more government to step in and mandate we do things differently.
Actually other statistics say there are 30 million illegal immigrants in the country. Are you providing US Census documents? because i'm sure that every illegal immigrant fills out that census form. Also with 30 million of them think about how many children per household. Lets say on average 4 kids per II Household. So that's 40 million we are providing healthcare for as well. I can't say we can't take care of children but we are decreasing our veterans HC and pensions and increasing government aide to those who are here illegally.US illegal population is 11.7m, the US population is 313.9m - 10% does mean per capita they're overrepresented for how many there are, three times as often as a citizen - but that's still a drop in the overall bucket.
And I never said a word about people being turned away because of no insurance before, it's actually illegal under triage standards unless a patient is considered healthy to street to consider insurance at all before treatment in a hospital setting. And if you hate the idea of illegals getting healthcare, one big way to actually get away from the "allow anyone without insurance to use an ER" which creates this entire issue is to make sure every citizen is legally required to have insurance.
For anyone conscious or unconscious with family prove who they are with ID or SSN + background questions from your tax record or else you don't get treated is only an option if every citizen is insured.
PS - On car insurance being mandated - last I checked it's only mandated in 43 states not nationwide, and the carry rate for insurance is over 90%. Additionally the max payout for a car accident is under $100k for cheap insurance in my state, and I'd imagine Maryland's minimums are higher than most knowing how litigious this state is. Max payout for a health insurance policy is fundamentally infinite. So assuming they should be anywhere on the same order to each other is absolute folly. [Not to mention your car insurance policy doesn't cover maintenance, whereas health insurance does - I personally would love to see health insurance spun off into something for catastrophic coverage with mandates tied to it, but "maintenance healthcare" without it (although with a premium reduction for the catastrophic if you have it, since people that do health maintenance have lesser overall costs)]
PSS - ER cash costs and insured (pre-insurance) costs haven't changed substantially in thirty years, they're actually legally precluded from rolling defaulted costs onto the patient in the ER for fundamentals - its possible some insurance policies changed their %, mine never did pre-Medicare in the 20 years I used BC/BS (Federal under my parents, and Upstate NY Excellus on my own for the other 15 - don't recall insurance costs before my teens though) and Medicare never will obviously. Almost all defaulted costs actually get reimbursed by the Fed - so it's not paid for directly by other users of the hospital (part of why you'll note all hospitals in a region tend to charge near identically outside of special procedures) - it's just paid for by taxpayers in general by all of us.
they aren't however leading in specialized medical knowledge or invention which based on that scientific progress lowers the overall human suffering in the world.In the particular case of healthcare, yes. Healthcare is a public good, and is one of the primary reasons to even have a government. Other western countries are providing their citizens with better healthcare for less money, and they are not doing it with "less government."
They are in some areas, but in general I agree with you. However, I argue that the two are not mutually exclusive. Why can't we do both? Why would a single-payer system necessarily hinder "specialized medical knowledge or invention"? Single-payer systems are just straight-up more efficient. Why would a single-payer system preclude innovation or a market for more expensive, experimental healthcare? We can have our cake and eat it too.they aren't however leading in specialized medical knowledge or invention which based on that scientific progress lowers the overall human suffering in the world.
Single payer has no incentive to improve or change.They are in some areas, but in general I agree with you. However, I argue that the two are not mutually exclusive. Why can't we do both? Why would a single-payer system necessarily hinder "specialized medical knowledge or invention"? Single-payer systems are just straight-up more efficient. Why would a single-payer system preclude innovation or a market for more expensive, experimental healthcare? We can have our cake and eat it too.
Depends on the category - there's plenty of categories where those "dirty Euros" are kicking our asses in medical technology and procedure research.they aren't however leading in specialized medical knowledge or invention which based on that scientific progress lowers the overall human suffering in the world.
Those "other statistics" are estimates based on absolutely nothing, the 11m figure was figured out based on how many were found in a given area by INS - and the number is additionally bolstered a bit from what the numbers were when Reagan gave amnesty back during his term, back then it was 2.2% of the US population - now those estimates would land in the 3-4% range now, which is about appropriate. 30 mil illegals would literally be 1 in 10 people on the street being an illegal, which is ludicrous even places like Arizona that are supposedly "overrun with illegals" have their politicians quoting around 1 in 20. (5%)Actually other statistics say there are 30 million illegal immigrants in the country. Are you providing US Census documents? because i'm sure that every illegal immigrant fills out that census form. Also with 30 million of them think about how many children per household. Lets say on average 4 kids per II Household. So that's 40 million we are providing healthcare for as well. I can't say we can't take care of children but we are decreasing our veterans HC and pensions and increasing government aide to those who are here illegally.
Negative. People have ALWAYS BEEN TREATED THAT WAY in US hospitals since the AMA has existed under AMA rules, it was one of the founding rules of the AMA - and soon after the Federal government reinforced it formally. Big fucking hint, smart guy - what do you think the hospital does when they pull someone out of a wreck that's been burning? Say "Oh well, his wallet burned up and he can't prove who he is - fuck him - besides he might be an illegal" like your wet dream would be?People are being treated before insurance because of a newly enforced Obama bill which was created because some people thought they weren't getting proper treatment because of them (not paying their bill, or no insurance at registration). Thanks big O.
Citation for this? Hospitals around me are all hiring more now than they were before - and we've got a shitload of hospitals in Maryland. LPN I see over 400 positions available just in my ZIP code alone, RN just shy of 200, NP about 80. Just in ONE zip code.The biggest picture here is patient safety. With all the new legislation that has occurred from the ACA hospitals are doing BIG cuts. Big cuts to patient safety. These hospitals are owned by big wigs who "will not let their company go bankrupt" over some ACA bill that's for sure.
Did you even read this article past the title? Or even past the quote that Drudge had before it (or where ever you got it without reading it obviously) - they stated in the article this policy happened as a result of the recession and that this hospital has been known to do scummy shit before - not ONE assertion or relation in the article to the ACA.
a) Doctor jobs aren't being cut, period. Right now there's a shortage because of TOO MANY RETIRING VERSUS THOSE THAT THE AMA ALLOWS TO GRADUATE EACH YEAR. The entire health care industry has been suffering from that issue, nursing has been the same way for over a decade now where every place is getting tighter on nurses because it's not a popular field to educate in anymore. (its not artificially stunted like doctors though)Also the fact that most hospitals are making mid level providers the sole providers in most care now because doctors jobs are being cut.
All the "unhealthy lifestyles" that are actual choices people can make are allowed to be penalized with your insurance rates under the ACA. Even obesity if your doctor codes it as you being belligerent about keeping your weight in line. Most of the other obvious ones being penalized automatically. (i.e. Smoking)The only possible good thing that the ACA does is help preventative care. Which is a toss up. This will not improve rates for people who have unhealthy lifestyles to begin with. It's been known for years smoking is bad for your health- Do people give a shit? Try the root of the problem- The cigarette companies but i'm sure they have paid off way too many politicians for any real rules to be made for them.
a) If he's working part time he's going to qualify for a substantial subsidy unless he's making $100+/hr. Possibly even free if he's low enough income.Why should a 30 year old part time worker/student pay 200$ for healthcare he doesn't need if he is a healthy individual if his part time work does not provide him medical insurance? Most people who are hardworking Americans cannot pay another 200$ bill a month- let alone pay a penalty if they do not have insurance for healthcare they do not use. The only good thing about this is the catastrophic element. Not in the primary care region.
We don't produce that many doctors not because of demand on any side of the equation - we don't produce that many because the AMA says only X number can be licensed a year. The other factors are immaterial.India has cheap medical procedures with very great success- Yet they have a free market and produce MD's at a faster rate that USA. Only having to go to school for around 4 years puts more competition in the healthcare industry. Where the average American Medical student will go to school for 10+ years and have half a million dollars in debt after he/she graduates. And adding all the doctor cuts i'm sure the medical schools will produce fewer students who would be great doctors.
Wait times are largely a myth - they're almost always corner cases that are a weak point of the nation that are trumped up to be the norm. And universally low priority stuff like knee replacements and other "comfort" not life or death stuff. [And FYI our wait times in the US for a good doctor to do similar procedures ain't too hot - joint replacements are often 4-12 month wait times in the US]The national healthcare wait times are hideous and quality of care is considered poor in most places other than America/India.
They could but it's redundant - you're just quoting a Fox talking point that has no substance here. No one that has a policy already has to switch and the policies provided are fundamentally identical - would you change your policy for no damn reason and register a whole bunch of new insurance cards with all your doctors and have to deal with a potentially different customer service method for no reason if you didn't like your previous insurance?If the ACA is so great why won't politicians sign up for it? Because most of the time it's going directly into their pockets to begin with.
piggvomit;538260 said:I'm done and have made every statement I want to make. I will remain silent as I watch this fire get bigger and bigger. America's debt climb. The last thing I will say...(yes it might be a bit long)['quote]
The ACA as a factor of the debt is a trivial factor - and in fact is scheduled according to the CBO to start generating a slight profit starting around 2020 or so with it being almost entirely flat the time leading up to it. (Or was it 2030? Forget if it was a 10 or 20 year estimate....)
Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness - two of those three absolutely require you to be healthy to be able to do. Liberty with some mental gymnastics probably could as well, but Life and Happiness are two of the largest reasons people go to Healthcare professionals - either because they're in fear of something killing them (Life), mental illness of some sort (Happiness), or pain/discomfort (Happiness).Healthcare should be a privilege. And sometimes a charity for certain circumstances beyond our control but we shouldn't be entitled to healthcare/ or have a right to healthcare
Right to our freedom/free will- Yes
Right to our life- Yes
Right to our defense/security- Yes
But what did the Founders know, right?
Interesting that you pick "the past 20 years" when there's been quite a few successes of various levels - but the media coverage became much more pundit heavy lobbing firebombs constantly on everything that is done pretty much started around 94 in it's current form.That's what I mean by less government- Look at our US government and name one fucking "plan" or changes to our constitution that has been successful in the past 20 years.
Additionally, most laws see plenty of revision before they're set in stone. And finally, there's not been one "Constitutional change" in the past twenty years. There's been judicial opinions that have been made on some of the nuances but that's completely different to anyone literate in politics enough to actually be worthy of conversation. (And frankly with how nicely split the bench is right now, with plenty of conservative and liberal voices as well as a few neutral and how many of them have been more than just a split decision it's rather ludicrous to challenge those, especially if you don't have a substantial law background - I don't claim to know it well myself, I'm pretty sure they understand it better than me - just like how I won't tell a NASA engineer how to build a rocket, they know better than me too)
Funny you rant anti-liberal spew including "libtard" styled shit while the party more at fault for adding riders and the like that are obvious incarnations of this are the much larger offender, something like 70% of pork projects are for red states.They only care about votes so they can pad their pockets even more- They play you like a fucking flute. And you believe all the bullshit that comes outta their mouth willing to suck it down with a straw because every single America is asleep and cares more about their Facebook drama over some statement that Duck Dynasty star said in some dumb ass magazine. While they are passing bills under your nose to help only THEMSELVES.
Taxes have been flat for that group - even the investors in that group (like myself) have been flat [although abnormally low for the investors still] - insurance is the only difference and it's not a tax, it's a service. The only time you'll be taxed is if you opt out of getting any policy.Shouldn't have more taxes/regulations piled on them- We are struggling as a nation already just coming out of a recession.
This will only cripple the middle-class. Fiscally this plan is a failure. Until our government rewards people for doing the "Right" things instead of punishing them. And giving rewards for people who do the "Wrong" things this country will be going in the shitter pretty quick.
Average insurance increase policy for the past twenty years before the past three (a freeze was put into place after the ACA passed until shortly before the exchanges where the insurance companies were banned from adjusting rates outside of a few specifically allowed cases) averaged 4-10% increase ANNUALLY. Which for the policies I carried for my employees usually ended up being about $30/mo on average that the policy went up per year. My company floated the cost increase most years, as do many, but that doesn't sound like an abnormal increase in the slightest - insurance policies historically always go up every year when they're legally allowed to. Check in with your HR department and ask them for the full figures over the past twenty years if you don't believe me. [Make sure you get the BEFORE employer contribution figures]Although It doesn't really affect me, or my wifes profession/and or life my damn health insurance (which is company provided) did go up 20$ every 2 weeks. Which sorta pisses me off.
PS - Pretty damn moderate, but when you've got your nose up Malkin's ass anyone not up there with you is going to look liberal as hell. Where the whole world is against you.Flame on libtards-