No, your country was founded on terrorism and insurgency.No. This country was founded on small and limited government. But we continue to hand them more power because it's so much easier to live on your knees.
No, your country was founded on terrorism and insurgency.No. This country was founded on small and limited government. But we continue to hand them more power because it's so much easier to live on your knees.
Well if the administration said it it must be true! I totally believe them!
Misquoted completely, small and limited Federal government is the factual version.No. This country was founded on small and limited government. But we continue to hand them more power because it's so much easier to live on your knees.
Gallup is part of the administration now?Well if the administration said it it must be true! I totally believe them!
Its in the article:Gallup is part of the administration now?
And you don't use Gallup to track official numbers anyway. The entire premise is ridiculous.The White House last week reported a total of 7.1 million private insurance enrollments through the Affordable Care Act's health insurance exchanges, exceeding most expectations, despite a troubled rollout in October 2013.
An additional 3 million signed up for Medicaid, government-provided health insurance for low-income people, the administration said Friday, bringing the total number of sign-ups to over 10 million.
Right, it makes a lot more sense to assume that Obama is lying 100% of the time. My only question is how he keeps getting away with itWell if the administration said it it must be true! I totally believe them!
So gallup polled all 300 million people in the country to arrive at those numbers? Or did they poll a thousand people and then reported these huge increases in covered individuals?Right, it makes a lot more sense to assume that Obama is lying 100% of the time. My only question is how he keeps getting away with it
So they interviewed 43k people and then translated those numbers to a nation of 300 million.The results from the first quarter are based on more than 43,500 interviews with U.S. adults from Jan. 2 to March 31, 2014, as part of the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.
Merlin does not understand how statistics work. What a shocking revelation.So gallup polled all 300 million people in the country to arrive at those numbers? Or did they poll a thousand people and then reported these huge increases in covered individuals?
Found it:
So they interviewed 43k people and then translated those numbers to a nation of 300 million.
That must be totally accurate. I wouldn't dare question the results. Nothing to see here, move along now.
only True Americans were needed for accurate polls.did the unskewed polls guy poll every person in america???? i dont remember.
Must have as it was the only 100% accurate polling.did the unskewed polls guy poll every person in america???? i dont remember.
Might want to link the quote in the future, when you just quote the article link the general assumption is that you're challenging the premise of the article itself (that people polled felt it was 'accomplishing it's goal' - which is so open-ended of a question it's ridiculous IMO) not a minor quote that's actually tangential to the article's primary message.Its in the article:
And you don't use Gallup to track official numbers anyway. The entire premise is ridiculous.
Not sure what the accuracy of a 43k person poll is, but a 3k person poll is enough to get a figure that is correct with a +/-3% deviation - I know it slows drastically past the 3k mark, but I'd assume it's in the +/-1.5 to 2% range - so it's not going to be very far off regardless because, of how statistics work when done by a valid polling organization. (And note, Gallup tends to lean a tad conservative with their methodology and calling areas... so if anything it's likely wrongly pointing AGAINST it)So gallup polled all 300 million people in the country to arrive at those numbers? Or did they poll a thousand people and then reported these huge increases in covered individuals?
Found it:
So they interviewed 43k people and then translated those numbers to a nation of 300 million.
That must be totally accurate. I wouldn't dare question the results. Nothing to see here, move along now.
What are you majoring in at college?So they interviewed 43k people and then translated those numbers to a nation of 300 million.
It's already been established it isn't math related, and statistics is a math subset. So definitely nothing that would reinforce the value of sample sizes to him.What are you majoring in at college?
The article : "[...]according to the poll of 43,500 adult Americans between January and March. It has a margin of error of 1 percentage point."Not sure what the accuracy of a 43k person poll is, but a 3k person poll is enough to get a figure that is correct with a +/-3% deviation - I know it slows drastically past the 3k mark, but I'd assume it's in the +/-1.5 to 2% range - so it's not going to be very far off regardless because, of how statistics work when done by a valid polling organization. (And note, Gallup tends to lean a tad conservative with their methodology and calling areas... so if anything it's likely wrongly pointing AGAINST it)
Sounds just like more of that Obama MathThe article : "[...]according to the poll of 43,500 adult Americans between January and March. It has a margin of error of 1 percentage point."