Just like Skin, hair, and eye color, who your parents are, where you were born, what sex you are, even allergies. People need the Freedom? to make these choices, and have to live with their consequences. Don't infringe people's Liberty to make these choices, and sure as hell don't let the government get involved when people make poor choices!
Gotcha, wasn't sure who it had been, I know he butted heads with a couple different people specifically and I did not want to have to go back and sift through all the crap in this thread to find it. Not that I agree with the rest of your ideas, although they are a different take from others I've seen in the thread.
When gays were stoned to death for being gay, were there inclined to be gay who chose not to be gay because of that threat of stony death? Societies acceptance of gaydom has made it easier to choose to be gay. Since I believe in freedom, I ultimately believe in a person ability to choose their own fate whenever possible. That freedom can't exist without tards being able to choose to hate gays.
Everyone knows homosexuality is a choice, unlike fucking stuffed animals. That's genetic!
Are you retarded? Jesus cross checking Mary in the crease.
These people aren't choosing to act on their hatred. They are choosing not to act because of their hatred. You're comparison doesn't make sense.
Taking no action is not acting on your hate. You are the one who seems to insist that this situation is one that it isn't.
Shunning someone is an act. These people are deciding to treat gays differently than everyone else they deal with.
So, refusing to serve someone isn't an action taken because of your hate of that person?
