If sexuality was a choice, then the tests that are used to determine if a person is sexually attracted to children in child rape and molestation cases wouldn't work, because the person could just turn off their sexual attraction.
The fact is that a device which measures unconscious sexual arousal exists, and is used regularly in courts of law to determine if someone is predisposed towards attraction to children in child sex abuse cases. I don't know the name of it offhand, but it measures unconscious penis enlargement and they force these people to watch child porn and see if it turns them on. This evidence is allowed in a court of law, unlike a lie detector.
Furry's entire premise is simply wrong, from every possible standpoint.
The fact is that a device which measures unconscious sexual arousal exists, and is used regularly in courts of law to determine if someone is predisposed towards attraction to children in child sex abuse cases. I don't know the name of it offhand, but it measures unconscious penis enlargement and they force these people to watch child porn and see if it turns them on. This evidence is allowed in a court of law, unlike a lie detector.
Furry's entire premise is simply wrong, from every possible standpoint.