Indiana...Religious Freedom eh? *sigh*

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Izo

Izo

Tranny Chaser
19,622
23,956
Kuriin_sl said:
Royal, who is that delicious guy in your avatar?

Chaos, you're gay? Call me. 800-RIM-JOBS


Amusing watching Siddar and Furry continue digging themselves in a deeper hole, haha.
Click to expand...
Hmm, iPad Safari can click'n call this. Gaaaaaay.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
I would have had to have taken that position in the first place to run away from it.

Siddar is a pyromaniac in a field full of strawmen right now.
 
Siddar

Siddar

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,465
6,012
hodj_sl said:
I guess when you've run out of arguments to the point Siddar has, all you have left is to stake your territory on shitty strawmen and hope it sticks.
Click to expand...
Well believe it are not I didn't come post in this thread to have a argument with you. Sense we have arrived at the point where there is no factual difference in are views on genetics not being the only cause of homosexuality just your desire for a argument that there is one. In spite of the fact that are positions seem to be close enough now to each other to be basically the same. Ill just tell you to go fuck yourself and have a nice day.

Now we see if Hodj can avoid moonbat disease of forgetting that a argument was settled and not restarting it again as if previous discussion had never happened within a matter of days.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Siddar proving his intellectual dishonesty knows few, if any, limits.

Homosexuality is not a choice, which is your claim. You definitely came into this thread looking for an argument, you found it, and you lost it. Handily.

Everyone sees it. Its plain as day.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
hodj_sl said:
Siddar proving his intellectual dishonesty knows few, if any, limits.

Homosexuality is not a choice, which is your claim. You definitely came into this thread looking for an argument, you found it, and you lost it. Handily.

Everyone sees it. Its plain as day.
Click to expand...
Except, he took that stance as a choice to show how everything in life is in fact a choice.
 
BoldW

BoldW

Molten Core Raider
2,081
25
Siddar_sl said:
Well believe it are not I didn't come post in this thread to have a argument with you. Sense we have arrived at the point where there is no factual difference in are views on genetics not being the only cause of homosexuality just your desire for a argument that there is one. In spite of the fact that are positions seem to be close enough now to each other to be basically the same. Ill just tell you to go fuck yourself and have a nice day.

Now we see if Hodj can avoid moonbat disease of forgetting that a argument was settled and not restarting it again as if previous discussion had never happened within a matter of days.
Click to expand...
I make spelling and grammatical errors now and again, but holy crap, man. "believe it are not", "a argument", "Sense we have arrived", "difference in are views", "a argument" (again), "are positions", "Ill". This shit is upsetting me more than your position at the moment.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
BoldW_sl said:
I make spelling and grammatical errors now and again, but holy crap, man. "believe it are not", "a argument", "Sense we have arrived", "difference in are views", "a argument" (again), "are positions", "Ill". This shit is upsetting me more than your position at the moment.
Click to expand...
Siddar is really

6kzSRrE.jpg
 
Ritley

Ritley

Bronze Baron of the Realm
16,029
35,119
That's not even spelling and grammar. That is straight up not knowing that are and our aren't the same word.
 
Famm

Famm

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
11,041
794
chaos_sl said:
Bro I am legitimately serious, I don't understand how you could think "Well I could definitely be into guys if I just wanted to hard enough." What in your life experience makes you think that?
Click to expand...
You don't remember deciding to be attracted to females?
 
Siddar

Siddar

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,465
6,012
chaos_sl said:
Bro I am legitimately serious, I don't understand how you could think "Well I could definitely be into guys if I just wanted to hard enough." What in your life experience makes you think that?
Click to expand...
You know there are people out there attracked to both sexes equally?

How do you explain that?
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Siddar_sl said:
You know there are people out there attacked to both sexes equally?

How do you explain that?
Click to expand...
If you had any idea what the fuck you were talking about, you wouldn't have to ask that question. Its called the Kinsey scale

Kinsey scale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is much like the debate over racial categorization between anthropologists and people who believe that races are properly descriptive of human biological variation.

Its called a cline in biological diversity conversations, we can call it a spectrum when we're discussing sexuality.

The interaction between genetic predisposition and environment leads to a spectrum of sexual expression that cannot be classified as simply X or Y, but rather must be classified as a gradient from NONE to ALL, with all points in between represented.

At this point Siddar, you've demonstrated you simply do not have the foundational understanding of pretty much any of this topic to speak on it credibly if you aren't aware of the Kinsey scale.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.