tad10
Elisha Dushku
- 5,533
- 599
We're so far away from them that we now have people like Tad10 wanting to relitigate the Civil Rights era to justify their discrimination of others based on their fundamental characteristics.The free market system and the fact that we are light years away from our southern and northern racist past
This isn't just about cakes. We have people who have trained as social workers who refuse to deal with gays in that role as well. Psychiatrists as well.Anyway, back to Thought Police, again you continue to justify the coercive use of the state to force people to bake cakes to people they don't want to bake cakes for
This is about pharmacists that want to deny the ability to provide birth control based on their religious beliefs. This is about insurance companies wanting to deny contraceptive and other forms of medical coverage to women and minorities based on their religious beliefs.With increasing frequency, we are seeing individuals and institutions claiming a right to discriminate - by refusing to provide services to women and LGBT people - based on religious objections. The discrimination takes many forms, including:
Religiously affiliated schools firing women because they became pregnant while not married;
Business owners refusing to provide insurance coverage for contraception for their employees;
Graduate students, training to be social workers, refusing to counsel gay people;
Pharmacies turning away women seeking to fill birth control prescriptions;
Bridal salons, photo studios, and reception halls closing their doors to same-sex couples planning their weddings.
While the situations may differ, one thing remains the same: religion is being used as an excuse to discriminate against and harm others.
Instances of institutions and individuals claiming a right to discriminate in the name of religion aren't new. In the 1960s, we saw institutions object to laws requiring integration in restaurants because of sincerely held beliefs that God wanted the races to be separate. We saw religiously affiliated universities refuse to admit students who engaged in interracial dating. In those cases, we recognized that requiring integration was not about violating religious liberty; it was about ensuring fairness. It is no different today.
Religious freedom in America means that we all have a right to our religious beliefs, but this does not give us the right to use our religion to discriminate against and impose those beliefs on others who do not share them.
Through litigation, advocacy and public education, the ACLU works to defend religious liberty and to ensure that no one is either discriminated against nor denied services because of someone else's religious beliefs.
No, as I indicated from the beginning it's about control.This is about pharmacists that want to deny the ability to provide birth control based on their religious beliefs. This is about insurance companies wanting to deny contraceptive and other forms of medical coverage to women and minorities based on their religious beliefs..
Just to make this clear: Religious people refusing treatments, services, etc. to minorities and others based on their religious beliefs isNOTthem trying to impose their belief system on everyone else. And everyone else wanting to purchase goods and services without having to worry about being embarrassed, insulted and discriminated against when they go out in public and engage in lawful business transactions with othersISthem trying to impose their belief system on everyone else.it's about fascists like you who want to impose their belief systems on everyone.
I've rarely seen a more dictionary definition of doublethink displayed so blatantly for all to see.WAR IS PEACE,
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY,
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
dou?ble?think
'd?b?l?THiNGk/Submit
noun
the acceptance of or mental capacity to accept contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination.
Seriously? You trying to pull this shit right after a co-pilot just suicided by plane by plowing it into the first mountain he could find leaving debris and bodies everywhere? And he did this because the other pilot was using an axe to break into the cockpit.Sounds like Tad needs to tell us where the plane is.
WHERE'S THE PLANE TAD?WHERE'S THE PLANE???
Lol. Wearing your brownshirt proudly I see. You, and oh yes the ACLU too, along with most of the Authoritarian Left these days, want to control people on the Right and tell them what they can and cannot do and can and cannot believe.I've rarely seen a more dictionary definition of doublethink displayed so blatantly for all to see.
No, you monumental dipshit.And you and most of this forum thought that the idea put forth by China/US/Australia
Funny how this country gives special privileges to religious groups though;That's probably the worst debate I've ever seen on this forum and in any other media.
You're bad and you should feel bad.
There's no god, until you prove to the contrary, you're not allowed to discriminate against people because God. You got a problem with it? Tough shit.
Not in for profit industry though.F
Government lets people use god for a whole host of benefits.
You ever heard of this thing called the US Constitution son?Funny how this country gives special privileges to religious groups though;.
Fascists, just like you, the ACLU, SJWs and the rest of the Authoritarian Left. Then only difference between them and you guys, is that y'all try to cloak your urge to control others under the guise of "equality." But who's kidding who, y'all would send the Right to concentration or re-education camps in a heartbeat if you could.Who were the brown shirts tad?
He's not even original with that shit. Mikhail was the first, Tanoomba tried it too.I think my favorite stupid thing that Tad has done on this forum is put that Hodj quote as his sig. As if he should embarrassed at saying that or something.