- 614
- 482
Not gonna happen he ain't no chump115 shares SPY $527.69. Cut the fucking rates, Jerome.
Major events come and go, I believe demographics are the hidden hand that is more impactful over the long trend than the events. Markets have cycles because they are a reflection of our populace and THEIR cycles. We really have to fight the , "this time it's different" what's happening to us now always feel more impactful to us than past events we didn't live through. Humans are the consistent variable. Secular trends have existed since modern economics started. The expansion periods and consolidation periods. We are going to have another lost decade the why of it doesn't really matter, it will happen and it will feel like utter shit. There is still money to be made it just requires a different outlook to the game.I don’t know if I disagree with Blazin’s chart analysis, but the stats on black swan events say we’ve been fucked harder than most average generations. (Maybe we deserve it bc we’ve also had great growth.) my point is that you don’t get there without some fairly serious shit going down and while those things historically always happen, they have not been as common until recently. (2000-current)
2001 was a tech bust / 911 combo. 2008 collapse was a total loss in confidence in the entire financial system more or less, so that’s a tier 3 black swan along with Covid, the fear of the entire world potentially being out of business.
Obviously, these things happen and will happen again and again, because humans naturally push the boundaries with financial opportunity and ultimately fuck it up, but it’s also possible we learn a little something and avoid the full blown event.
Tier 2 is probably a war or natural disaster while T1 is a normal fear of market conditions.
The US has lots of issues and you can make up all kinds of scenarios that these things go down, so the point is valid on the loss potential because it’s definitely real, but if you stretch it out far enough, then you get a few less ‘black swans’ and hopefully that’s closer to the truth than the last 20 years.
While I type this I think of all the ways we could lose total confidence in the financial system again and I lose the little gusto I had
08:30*(US) INITIAL JOBLESS CLAIMS: 233K V 240KE; CONTINUING CLAIMS: 1,875M V 1.87ME - Source TradeTheNews.com
The numbers are very messy right now and they are dubious at the best of times. There was a lot of temp unemployment from the storm. I don't think the market is focused so much on what employment situation is versus how they feel the Fed feels about it. All this shit will be adjusted multiple times, the real numbers are the ones we get 5-6 months later. I think people want there to be weakness but not "concerning" weakness, just enough to get what they want, which is their cheap money punch bowl back without a recession.Wait a minute,
Combined with the rising unemployment rate (4.1 >> 4.3) this tells me that the job market is actually worse than either metric suggests. Unemployment rising, and jobless claims falling tells me that people been far longer out of work than the government wants to admit, and that their benefits are being exhausted.
Kinda retarded for the market to jump on this news. Its like last week's unemployment numbers were completely memory holed.
Am I wrong here?
I don't think in percent I don't track them, I don't care. That's the truth of it do what you will. That is not something I've seen in full time traders I've spoken with ( Jysin do you set your goals by percent?) People who make their living using other people's money, now those people talk about it all the time because they are competing with your other options. So if I've given you wrong impression, I'm not interested in managing your money Cad .
Now it's a legitimate question to say "Why don't you think in percent" , for me its an idea that sounds good in theory but doesn't hold up the nuance of RL at least for me. All I can speak to is what I do, I don't really spend my time thinking about what others should be doing. Every year I set a dollar goal that meets my families needs and wants within the bounds of our risk tolerance. Let's say I have a good spring then take the entire summer off how would you have me handle that?
"IF" you truly don't want to experience a drop, I wouldn't go to cash. Go to short dated bonds (best yield and they allow liquidity on the roll). This is what Buffett has been doing. I'm not advising you to do it, but Buffett seems to feel like your sister. If the market rips higher for the next 12 months it was a bad strategy. If the market dives lower the next 12 months it was a great strategy. There is no way to know until 12 months from now.So I’m not a good short term investor. BUT. Should I just go cash now and wait for the crash and hop back in?
Im not being emotional. I’m reading Blazin posts and listening to my sister.
My sis and bro and law have sold four homes at the top of the market for the last 20 years. She has an uncanny ability to sense it. Last night she said, “It’s time to sell our house again.” I asked why and she said, “I feel it in my gut!”.
Then there’s Blazin’s perspective and the fact that we’ve been running hot for a while. I’m not trying to time anything. I just don’t want to feel the pain.
As you say this subject comes up now and again, though not as often as "my jboots feel slower". I am less a $$ guy and more a percent guy. As I have said lots of times, there is no one path to winning in investing. Lots of methods work for lots of people. There are so many variables that it allows for different strategies. I believe what came out of Cad 's post is two different methodologies at play. People in the percent camp want things normalized across numerous disparate items. You can't manage what you cant measure is an old mantra. For you, its more of a P&L thing. Working capital, budgets and cash targets to meet those budgets.
You 100% hit in on target when you look at those investing for retirement and those investing to pay their bills each month. If you need $XXX dollars to meet your needs for the year, it doesn't matter your gain %, what matters is the dollar amount gain relative to your goals. It is something you mention regularly, your $$ goal for the year. For those socking money into their 401k, its about percent of alpha because that camp is looking to maximize return across various investing instruments. Percent is an easy mechanism that is normalized across all the choices. SPY gets me 9.75%, ARKK gets me -25%. Choice is simple.
The one big plus I see to a percent-centric discussion is it allows all the participants to be able to view it in their own terms. The 25 year old guy with $5k in his account can view it in terms that apply to him as well as the guy with $500k in his account. The adoption of fractional investing was a godsend to smaller investors. They aren't limited to low priced investments so the strats that higher $$ investors use can still be viable strats to low dollar investors by just sliding the decimal a place or two.
Liking it good broad participation., interest rates climbing. Watching bonds and looking and order back in on QQQSo how we feeling about todays rally seems like it might hang on.
I 100% agree, but it wasn't what I was alluding to in that paragraph. I was only thinking in terms of maximizing investment strategies. The 25-year old should stop working because he made 100% return in a year. That would be ludicrous of him. I meant he shouldn't be in bonds (of any percentage of his portfolio) because the percent gain is inferior to something that carries more risk because he has the time to ride out downturns and as you say time is the most important variable for him due to compounding returns.Good post, but I would disagree with the last paragraph. All this talk of money and returns, there is really only one resource and that is TIME. We use money to help with time. It's hard for people to get this but its not hard to make a lot of money with a little. WHen you've taken TIME to make money you aren't getting any more added to your ledger. A 25 yr old making 10-20 even 100% on 5k doesn't mean much he can just go get a job and outstrip those numbers by 10 fold. He has tons of time and earnings potential in front of him. If your annual returns are just a fraction of your annual revenue then they may matter but that is not at all the same thing as when the table is turned.
A young person shouldn't waste their TIME on % returns they should maximize their income for their TIME and live below their means and save. THe greatest investor to ever live can't compete with a young guy just going out and getting even a basic job and saving. My % return whatever it is, is a reflection of money management not skill limit. You're comparing people who are purposefully limiting risk (about every wealthy individual on the planet) with someone who is likely not even risking their monthly salary.
was sitting with wife and dog on couch last night thinking should I log on and buy in AH on that nice dip but I didn't feel like getting up
Anyway back in QQQ 530 shares
Rep don't grind itself.Well I think we all agree the dumb little shit should be putting his money in the S&P and get back to grinding.
Excellent post.Good post, but I would disagree with the last paragraph. All this talk of money and returns, there is really only one resource and that is TIME. We use money to help with time. It's hard for people to get this but its not hard to make a lot of money with a little. WHen you've taken TIME to make money you aren't getting any more added to your ledger. A 25 yr old making 10-20 even 100% on 5k doesn't mean much he can just go get a job and outstrip those numbers by 10 fold. He has tons of time and earnings potential in front of him. If your annual returns are just a fraction of your annual revenue then they may matter but that is not at all the same thing as when the table is turned.
A young person shouldn't waste their TIME on % returns they should maximize their income for their TIME and live below their means and save. THe greatest investor to ever live can't compete with a young guy just going out and getting even a basic job and saving. My % return whatever it is, is a reflection of money management not skill limit. You're comparing people who are purposefully limiting risk (about every wealthy individual on the planet) with someone who is likely not even risking their monthly salary.