- 9,970
- 16,985
300 shares with an average cost basis of 4.33. I’ll let you do the math.
Profit?
300 shares with an average cost basis of 4.33. I’ll let you do the math.
I haven’t sold yet bro. I’m holding this puppy another 4-6 years prob. They will be the primary competition for spacex, among other things. I’m a big believer in Sir Peter Beck.Profit?
I'm going with 25 but lower confidence in what they are going to do since before Janet. I'm not sure they have decided. Its either going to be 25 with a lot of clear projection about the next one. Or its 50 and we are "data dependent"Traders today pricing in a 45% chance of a 50 basis pt cut instead of 25 basis pts. Up from 15% yesterday. Crazy.
I see zero economic reason to cut by 50 pts. Only political ones. I think it "should" be 25, but we will see.I'm going with 25 but lower confidence in what they are going to do since before Janet. I'm not sure they have decided. Its either going to be 25 with a lot of clear projection about the next one. Or its 50 and we are "data dependent"
If we can get a spike into the close I'm contemplating selling. I know I'm letting goal and YTD progress have a lot of weight on that instead of just the price action but this has been a nice year for me and I'm well ahead of my projection for year end. I'm obsessively goal oriented and it's ahrd for me to justify going for more. THe counter to that is to make it while you can because you never know what kind of year we are going to have next.
I want that ATH and it's starting to look not int he cards for today.
Well I see a tactical reason, that I mentioned. 50 allows you to go back to "neutral" stop talking about cuts, data dependent, wait and see. I think that is the stance they want to be on. You give em 25 and you are going to immediately be in the position of when is second breakfast.I see zero economic reason to cut by 50 pts. Only political ones. I think it "should" be 25, but we will see.
I preferWell I see a tactical reason, that I mentioned. 50 allows you to go back to "neutral" stop talking about cuts, data dependent, wait and see. I think that is the stance they want to be on. You give em 25 and you are going to immediately be in the position of when is second breakfast.
I consider this a political reason, not an economic one.Well I see a tactical reason, that I mentioned. 50 allows you to go back to "neutral" stop talking about cuts, data dependent, wait and see. I think that is the stance they want to be on. You give em 25 and you are going to immediately be in the position of when is second breakfast.
Who is it good for though? 50bps but a messaging reset to 'well we are back to wait and see no future cuts planned for the immediate future unless the data warrants' it isn't exactly in line with the markets expectation of 100bps by year end and you could see a pullback on that kind of talk.I consider this a political reason, not an economic one.
From a political point of view, incumbent desperately wants the market to rocket now to the election. An unwarranted 50 basis pt cut means that market will run and they only have to fake inflation numbers for Oct. By the time the inflation's comes roaring back they either lost the WH or they won it for 4 years and don't give a shit.Who is it good for though? 50bps but a messaging reset to 'well we are back to wait and see no future cuts planned for the immediate future unless the data warrants' it isn't exactly in line with the markets expectation of 100bps by year end and you could see a pullback on that kind of talk.
Oh ya that I get I just mean that a 50bps as a big splash first cut but language that says we are back to slow and data driven while we watch things for a few months and no promises might not give the market reaction they want. 25bps and a wink and a promise of another 25 in a month is probably more what they want.From a political point of view, incumbent desperately wants the market to rocket now to the election. An unwarranted 50 basis pt cut means that market will run and they only have to fake inflation numbers for Oct. By the time the inflation's comes roaring back they either lost the WH or they won it for 4 years and don't give a shit.
I don’t know anything about them. From what I saw that stock moved with hype. I have a friend who works in space which is why I feel comfortable with RKLB - I’m able to get some insight into that portion of the space market.Yo space bro what about LUNR?
I’d be curious to do research into what geographical regions currently don’t have broadband and what providers that serve those greater regions are currently doing to expand that. There’s a lot of money to be made connecting people to the internet which is why I imagine google was trying to bring google fiber to places like Kampala and Zuck was working on his broadband UAV/balloon thing. Maybe Araysar would have a better idea of how valuable it is to connect people as I think the majority of revenue and profit for companies with interest is going to be in advertising and eventually unlocking geographical regions to online retail.
There's just not enough time for any of this shit to matter for the election.From a political point of view, incumbent desperately wants the market to rocket now to the election. An unwarranted 50 basis pt cut means that market will run and they only have to fake inflation numbers for Oct. By the time the inflation's comes roaring back they either lost the WH or they won it for 4 years and don't give a shit.
No they want the market running as people are filling out absentee/early ballots. Its too far out to predict the market for election day but early voting begins in a few weeks.There's just not enough time for any of this shit to matter for the election.
If they were making a political decision they would have knocked basis points off heading into the height of summer, which is what I expected them to do. The fact that they didn't means the Fed is acting more independently than I thought.