But if it doesn't go back to 0, how will people who married the house but dated the rate afford it??I mean that was about as dovish as you could have possibly expected. I never can tell what the market will do on a given day but 150k of my personal money went in when we dropped back to flat on the qs on him saying no negative rates. (Wtf retarded algo expected him to say rates are trending back to 0 or negative)
Every time I think I'm starting to understand all of this Wall St/Finance wizard stuff I see a post like this and the illusion is shatteredSo dot plot has 2% drop in rates pencilled in by 2025. Yet, we have long end rates spiking / TLT down >1% / DXY V shape recovery post-Fed cut.
Bond market / dollar sniffing out some fuckery?
So dot plot has 2% drop in rates pencilled in by 2025. Yet, we have long end rates spiking / TLT down >1% / DXY V shape recovery post-Fed cut.
Bond market / dollar sniffing out some fuckery?
Bond market (as evidenced by pricing) doesn't believe the dot plot of 2% drop in rates by 2025.Every time I think I'm starting to understand all of this Wall St/Finance wizard stuff I see a post like this and the illusion is shattered
Can you explain this a bit more for the back of the class please, good sir?
It does seem VERY fast compared to how fast they raised rates to cut 2% inside of 4 months. If they were trying to follow a Volcker-style remedy to the economy when they started raising rates, it should have been RAISE quickly then cut slowly. But now they're professing they're about to do the opposite? Granted, the 80's aren't equivalent to now of course, but still.Bond market (as evidenced by pricing) doesn't believe the dot plot of 2% drop in rates by 2025.
Correct. It goes back to the discussion of earlier in the week. Are they doing this for political reasons. The bond market seems to be calling bullshit on this not being a political move that is going to stall/get reversed come January.It does seem VERY fast compared to how fast they raised rates to cut 2% inside of 4 months. If they were trying to follow a Volcker-style remedy to the economy when they started raising rates, it should have been RAISE quickly then cut slowly. But now they're professing they're about to do the opposite? Granted, the 80's aren't equivalent to now of course, but still.
I would guess more February-March for the timeline, but my theory is the same.Correct. It goes back to the discussion of earlier in the week. Are they doing this for political reasons. The bond market seems to be calling bullshit on this not being a political move that is going to stall/get reversed come January.
Correct. It goes back to the discussion of earlier in the week. Are they doing this for political reasons. The bond market seems to be calling bullshit on this not being a political move that is going to stall/get reversed come January.
Disclaimer: Super duper not picking on you50 bps with stocks near ATHs lol
Jerome Burns has cemented his legacy.
We went into the day with a 74% chance of 50 baked in.The most interesting part about all of today was only JPmorgan predicted the 50. Coincidence?
Post the avatar you want me to wear Blazin.