Investing General Discussion

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
46,195
128,262
Sanrith can load up some "target retirement" fund returns versus the S&P so we can all have a good chuckle.


VTIVX the target 2045 Fund vs the SPY in a 10-year chart.

1737140798981.png
 
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 user

Captain Suave

Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
5,523
9,490
Well one thing I will say, is look at the performance of SPY in the 2000s. 2-3% growth. What's to say that doesn't happen again?

Nothing, but whatever does that to the US economy is going to be worse for international for the reasons Blazin lists and more. Take the returns that are happening now. You'll be able to rebalance if something dramatically changes; there will be months and years of signaling.

China: More communists, Japan/Skorea: declining population death spirals.

China has a much worse death spiral coming. They're looking at 40%+ population contraction over the next 50-75 years. Thx one child policy.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
46,195
128,262
Well one thing I will say, is look at the performance of SPY in the 2000s. 2-3% growth. What's to say that doesn't happen again?
Nothing. This is part of Mr. Markets crazy game.
Also, its easy to cherry pick years to support any conclusion. So the lifetime average return on the S&P over 100+ years is about 9.75%. Use that.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
46,195
128,262
China has a much worse death spiral coming. They're looking at 40%+ population contraction over the next 50-75 years. Thx one child policy.
If they didn't have nukes, Trump could slap them with 500% import tariffs, remove most favored nation trade status and crater their economy back to Ming Dynasty.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 1 users

tugofpeace

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
765
1,655
Dang. I have 20% of my retirement portfolio in VTMNX. Now have to dump all of that into an an index that tracks SPY at all time highs.. lmao. My brokerage doesn't even have VTI which is what I would've wanted.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,304
36,985
Dang. I have 20% of my retirement portfolio in VTMNX. Now have to dump all of that into an an index that tracks SPY at all time highs.. lmao. My brokerage doesn't even have VTI which is what I would've wanted.
I'm managing money for someone in this situation with a target retirement fund. I'm dollar cost averaging it over time and hoping for a nice move in bonds or a decline in S&P to help ease the move. Didn't want to just wait for the perfect time to do it as that could continue to be costly.
 

tugofpeace

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
765
1,655
I'm managing money for someone in this situation with a target retirement fund. I'm dollar cost averaging it over time and hoping for a nice move in bonds or a decline in S&P to help ease the move. Didn't want to just wait for the perfect time to do it as that could continue to be costly.

what's your timeframe to move it 100%? I'm thinking to take 9-12 months and whatever isn't moved immediately, put it into a VMFXX to get some yield

I remember it was suggested to dump it all immediately into an index a while back because time in market > timing the market, but I rather DCA.. who knows what happens early in Trumps presidency
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,304
36,985
what's your timeframe to move it 100%? I'm thinking to take 9-12 months and whatever isn't moved immediately, put it into a VMFXX to get some yield

I remember it was suggested to dump it all immediately into an index a while back because time in market > timing the market, but I rather DCA.. who knows what happens early in Trumps presidency
if no opportunity presented, 1yr but that isn't going to happen. For example during this weakness this month I moved 5x the normal weakly amount, bigger the opportunity the more I'll accelerate it.
 

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
41,289
140,654
International exposure is absolute shit, the EU is a train wreck of socialist regulatory BS, China: More communists, Japan/Skorea: declining population death spirals.

Vanguard and it's misguided conventional wisdom may now be the single largest destroyer of wealth in a generation and they refuse to just admit they completely f'd it up. The variables that make international shit aren't just going to flip next month, next quarter or next year, it's where capital goes to die.

Sanrith can load up some "target retirement" fund returns versus the S&P so we can all have a good chuckle.
One of the best points made in the Stock Series by JL Collins that I always recommend is that pretty much every large cap company in the US is also international. McDonald's, Coca Cola, Apple, Caterpillar, Exxon; they're all selling shit overseas.

Yeah, you miss out on the Sony's and Nestles. Who fucking cares? You don't need to own every company on the planet. If you want international exposure, you're already getting it with an S&P 500 index fund.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
46,195
128,262
One of the best points made in the Stock Series by JL Collins that I always recommend is that pretty much every large cap company in the US is also international. McDonald's, Coca Cola, Apple, Caterpillar, Exxon; they're all selling shit overseas.

Yeah, you miss out on the Sony's and Nestles. Who fucking cares? You don't need to own every company on the planet. If you want international exposure, you're already getting it with an S&P 500 index fund.
The only Intl company I would think about grabbing is Samsung. They have their little paws in everything on the planet.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
26,320
53,813
The only Intl company I would think about grabbing is Samsung. They have their little paws in everything on the planet.
Am I reading this wrong or is Samsung down 12% over the past 5 years when the market generally is up ~75%?

 

Furry

Email Loading Please Wait
<Gold Donor>
23,016
30,560
This is exactly what I have done ever since I started reading this thread. No reason to do anything else in a 401k from my perspective.
I've said it before I'm like 60% S&P, 25% tech, 12% small cap/dividends/market wide, 3% set my money on fire however I feel like.

I generally don't move money between funds more than once every 5 years, so It's more tech heavy than this, but this is generally how it starts off. Even my set my money on fire is mostly just some stocks of companies I like, so it really hasn't done bad either. My biggest account by far doesn't even let you invest in stocks or options at all.

Investing in bonds or targeted retirement just feels gross. I have a loan against that 401k which is down to like 10k left, and your collatoral gets held as treasuries, so I guess I do technically own a small share of that too. Technically I would have been a small fraction of 1% further ahead if I just took out the loan, but I've never paid interest on anything other than my house and I'm not about to start now.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
46,195
128,262
Am I reading this wrong or is Samsung down 12% over the past 5 years when the market generally is up ~75%?

Nope, that looks right. Good catch. I had no idea they cratered second half of last year. I guess it's a good thing I don't own it.
 

Kiroy

Marine Biologist
<Bronze Donator>
35,781
103,860
International exposure is absolute shit, the EU is a train wreck of socialist regulatory BS, China: More communists, Japan/Skorea: declining population death spirals.

Vanguard and it's misguided conventional wisdom may now be the single largest destroyer of wealth in a generation and they refuse to just admit they completely f'd it up. The variables that make international shit aren't just going to flip next month, next quarter or next year, it's where capital goes to die.

Sanrith can load up some "target retirement" fund returns versus the S&P so we can all have a good chuckle.

Reason number 73 i’m doing the tiresome full business and personal account switch from vanguard to fidelity.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Aeristies

Trakanon Raider
13
224
At the suggestion of folks in this thread a few years ago, I also moved my 401k balance & future contributions from my company's target date (2055) fund to straight S&P 500 (Fidelity's).

Just checked the performance for both and the S&P fund is outperforming by 11% YOY, 5% over the past 5yrs and 4.5% over the past 10. Obviously that's each year, and I've still got another ~30yrs for compounding to work its magic. Also has a 0.35% expense ratio for the target date fund, compared to 0.02% for straight S&P 500.

Would've never made the switch if not for the discussion(s) in this thread. Thanks bros! Wish I had done it 10yrs earlier, but you don't know what you don't know.
 
  • 6Like
Reactions: 5 users

Furry

Email Loading Please Wait
<Gold Donor>
23,016
30,560
At the suggestion of folks in this thread a few years ago, I also moved my 401k balance & future contributions from my company's target date (2055) fund to straight S&P 500 (Fidelity's).

Just checked the performance for both and the S&P fund is outperforming by 11% YOY, 5% over the past 5yrs and 4.5% over the past 10. Obviously that's each year, and I've still got another ~30yrs for compounding to work its magic. Also has a 0.35% expense ratio for the target date fund, compared to 0.02% for straight S&P 500.

Would've never made the switch if not for the discussion(s) in this thread. Thanks bros! Wish I had done it 10yrs earlier, but you don't know what you don't know.
Targeted date funds become more bonds over time. It's not that much of a disaster if you hold one early in their cycle, or for someone near retirement to hold one dated to later than their retirement date. Holding some bonds at retirement is pretty sensible, cause you're gonna be spending that money, so the long term gains don't mean as much.

The % you find in those targeted date bonds is way higher than what I'd consider generally reasonable for someone younger than 60 though.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

tugofpeace

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
765
1,655
At the suggestion of folks in this thread a few years ago, I also moved my 401k balance & future contributions from my company's target date (2055) fund to straight S&P 500 (Fidelity's).

Just checked the performance for both and the S&P fund is outperforming by 11% YOY, 5% over the past 5yrs and 4.5% over the past 10. Obviously that's each year, and I've still got another ~30yrs for compounding to work its magic. Also has a 0.35% expense ratio for the target date fund, compared to 0.02% for straight S&P 500.

Would've never made the switch if not for the discussion(s) in this thread. Thanks bros! Wish I had done it 10yrs earlier, but you don't know what you don't know.

I just started doing that; earlier I had about 70% SPY, 20% VXUS, 10% bonds. Got rid of the bonds couple months ago and started going 80/20. Now I'm 100% SPY.

The thing I don't like is that I don't have VTI in my 401k. It's gain since inception is 413% while SPY is 1260%.. caveat is that SPY is very tech heavy. In a limit down or crash scenario I think those holding 100% SPY will lose a lot more than thsoe holding VTI due to the diversification.

It's why I'm trying to figure out how to add some of that diversification into my 401k.. but I don't think I have any real funds which can do that.