Piers Morgan actually tried the "ebonics is a language" argument lol
What a fucking pathetic piece of shit.
"Black English"? For fuck's sake, giving shitty English a name doesn't legitimize it. It is still horrible English that, at the least, evidences poor education. Learn to speak properly, it isn't hard to obtain a decent grasp of the language.
You shouldn't be able to sign up for twitter or text until you can pass at least a middle school level English test.
Of course, "Ebonics" is a language. Language is what allows you to communicate ideas to others. When you grow up in an area where your friends and family speak a certain way, especially if you're exposed primarily to this way of speaking during your critical phase (before you turn 13 or so), that's the way you'll end up speaking. Your friends and family will understand you, and you will understand them, so you'll all be speaking the same language. I'm not saying we should teach "Ebonics" in school or even consider it as an acceptable substitute for "conventional" English (if there is such a thing). After all, as has been pointed out, if the person giving you a job interview isn't a friend or family member, you're likely to have a hard time convincing him you're right for the job.
Saying "it isn't hard to obtain a decent grasp of the language" is kind of stupid, though, for a few reasons. One, Jeantel has a flawless grasp of the language she grew up with. We all do. We learn languages primarily through exposure, and eventually whatever we're exposed to we become fluent at (assuming the exposure started during the critical phase). During childhood, your brain is very plastic and is exceptional at absorbing external stimuli. If a child is exposed primarily to Ebonics, he will become fluent in Ebonics. If he's exposed primarily to Klingon, he will be fluent in Klingon. Whatever version of whatever language (or languages) you are consistently exposed to, you will become fluent in.
Two, once you're past your critical phase, it becomes much more difficult to become fluent in another language. The brain has lost much of its plasticity, so learning another language (or even another version of the one you speak) takes a concerted effort and a lot of focused practice. This is why adults who move here from another country will never lose their accents (unless they try really, really hard to), but their kids (who are exposed to "standard" English at school and with their friends) will have no accent at all.
Three, maybe I'm a little biased (as a language teacher) but I didn't have any trouble understanding what Jeantel was saying. I found her demeanor irritating and she definitely gave me the impression she wasn't very smart, but I can say the absolute same thing about many of you guys. Sure you consider your version of English "better" than hers, but here are a few things that stuck out to me in the last few pages I read:
- Use of "women" as a singular.
- Use of "loose" instead of "lose".
- Use of "would of" instead of "would have".
- Use of "where" instead of "were".
Obviously you're all fluent in English, and yet you clearly haven't perfected the language yet. I'm not judging here, you don't have to perfect the language. All of those mistakes didn't interfere with the meanings you were trying to get across, so from a communicative point of view you can keep making those mistakes. Jeantel can communicate just find with the people she interacts with on a daily basis. It's not a "right" English vs "wrong" English dichotomy here, it's lots of grey areas that only ever have meaning based on the context in which they are used.