Himeo
Vyemm Raider
The Institute for Creation Research has a "peer reviewed journal".
Himeo's argument is that we can't disregard basically everything that comes out of that rag as nonsense because that is making science into a religion.
Re-fucking-tarded.
You don't understand my argument at all. Let me clarify it for you.
The Institute for Creation Research puts together an academic journal using peer-review. They publish something.
That paper is as valid as anything anyone else publishes. THIS IS NOT THE END OF THE PROCESS YOU RETARD.
In an ideal world, that paper is then scrutinized, torn apart, and the people who wrote it are humiliated.
That's how the system should work.
What I was arguing against is Khalid (and now you) demanding "reputable" journals as sources only. Every journal is just a group of people, and that places the importance not on empirical evidence or the peer review process, but on the opinions of the people who edit the journals.
Just because something is published doesn't mean the process is over.
So when I post my list of 125 peer-reviewed journal articles, I'm not posing 125 articles that all unanimously agree with PSI, I'm posting the entire fucking debate from start to finish including the papers scrutinizing everything.
If you are too dumb to understand this, watch the video I linked because it's more your speed and this topic is interesting as fuck.
- 1