Marriage and the Power of Divorce

Gravy_sl said:

The way I see it, you've got no basis for whatever it is you are trying to promote here.

We don't have kids, so I stay the fuck out of the Parenting Thread/Pregnant Thread. Not because I don't think I might have some insight that I brought from my own childhood, but simply because I don't have kids and lack the perspective of a parent. I have no authority on the subject, the same as you have none here.

Click to expand...

Since you've never played in the NFL, I assume we can expect to not hear your dumbfuckery in that thread this season?

I met another Asian chick from tinder that turned out to be even cuter than the last. I don't know what's happening but I'm 2/3 on chicks from tinder being better looking than expected and more fun than expected.

PS Scientific research shows that to make your wife attracted to you again, she needs to see a dude rail you from behind. The submission will turn her on. But it only lasts a year, so you need a booster sodomy each year

Phazael_sl said:

Or maybe she just wants you to brush your teeth before you go down on her and wash your balls before she gives you a hummer, but is too polite to say anything. The kind of shit those guys are talking about is for shallow cunts who they probably never should have gotten married to in the first place.

Click to expand...

Why would you brush your teeth before you go down on her? I don't think snatches can smell.

Dabamf_sl said:

PS Scientific research shows that to make your wife attracted to you again, she needs to see a dude rail you from behind. The submission will turn her on. But it only lasts a year, so you need a booster sodomy each year

Click to expand...

I was gonna come down on you like a HAMMER... but surprisingly the research does show that.

I really like how people here are basically saying thatthisis actually 100% the gospel truth.

And so, deconstructing and eventually discarding the ideas modern society has fed us, that of the advice to apply rationality to human interpersonal relationships on the basis of gender equalism, we can arrive at a more correct view, an understanding more reflective of biomechanical and psychosocial reality as it applies to the nature of women. We're not attaching quality to this nature - it's neither good nor bad; it justis, the same way the nature of specific animals just are.

Whatisdepressing however, is that this view constructed from reality destroys love's idealism. There is no such thing called love outside of a pure ideological, constructed thing, and the construction society has provided has to be discarded, looking into the nature of women, if we are to be objective and understand things such as they are.

Women 'fall in love' with you based on your psychosocial behavior towards them and greater society, which is reflected in both those behaviors and your attitude. That's opportunism. It is conditional, and this behavior & attitude must be maintained, both in the LTR and a marriage. Men are purely physical: a wife just has to maintain her body, and our idealistic notions of love will take root and mostly stay put because of how men have regulated themselves throughout history, through notions of virtue, honor, respect, etc (even if those are too illusory, we conduct ourselves according to them). Women, on the other hand, have survived, that is, their genes nature has selected by being opportunistic to dominance, and that is expressed today by what we call confidence (again, even if it's illusory).

Or the tl;dr, as Rollo said:Men love idealistically. Women love opportunistically.

This is what redpill and Game is for, to dispell these illusory notions, put reality back into view and give some power back to guys in the dating market.

Kirun_sl said:

Since you've never played in the NFL

Click to expand...

That's a pretty big assumption, Kirun.

Dammit.

The over analyzing in this thread is fucking stupid. I thought this was the married person thread not the "I have no fucking idea how to date women but I have a theoretical knowledge" thread.

Can we please not pretend you need to be married to have insight on human relationships between men and women?

Khane_sl said:

Can we please not pretend you need to be married to have insight on human relationships between men and women?

Click to expand...

To know the interactions between two people who have seen each other every single day of their lives for years? Yes you kind of need to experience to know it.

Soygen_sl said:

Sure, but you don't need to be married to have that experience.

Click to expand...

For sure but Dumar coming in talking about how after being together for five years I need to be concerned about building attraction and carnal desire is fucking stupid. It reeks of reading a few blogs and seduction forums and having a girlfriend here and there for six months max. Which is more appropriate for the GWBYHT instead of here which shouldn't be concerned about picking up women.

I was just ragging on Dumar.

I've been married a long time, and it's a helluva lot different than when we were dating or living together I can assure you. It's something that happens over time, and for us it's been for the better.

Everyone's opinion belongs here.

/mea culpa

This thread started off as a pretty strong "fuck gold diggers + all women are gold diggers" thread anyway before it was hijacked.

Is redpill relevant to the temporary tensions arising in a long marriage? Nah, probably not. But don't go all thread purist about it. Pages 1-10 are pretty fucking bad.

Gravy_sl said:

That's a pretty big assumption, Kirun.

Click to expand...

Dude, we all know Utnayan is our only former NFL star. Quit tryna front, yo.