I'll allow it. You appear to be qualified enough to post on the topic of the NFL. Have fun discussing it with Utnayan.I once sold a laptop to the Bengals field goal kicker. So I'm kind of part of the NFL. I also got drunk with the Bengals cheerleaders once at a bar.
This thread had developed a purpose over time: the sharing of divorce experiences (with some follow up on dating post-divorce) and husband/wife interaction venting. Lately, it has been a complete spill-over of GWBYH material.This thread started off as a pretty strong "fuck gold diggers + all women are gold diggers" thread anyway before it was hijacked.
Is redpill relevant to the temporary tensions arising in a long marriage? Nah, probably not. But don't go all thread purist about it. Pages 1-10 are pretty fucking bad.
It's been that way for awhile now, especially after Onoes posts. It really is just the new GWBYHT.Lately, it has been a complete spill-over of GWBYH material.
A fair point.Especially since I think the posters from the original GHBYHT are creeped out by J49's hooker stories.
The point of this thread was red pill discussion. For a brief moment of time, it became the Onoes show. After we all found out he was a 13 year-old goth boy in a baby man's body we had to find a new object to focus on: Julian. Julian's stories aren't as over the top as Onoes', but there is potential. Couple this with a sprinkling of lindz selfies and bra pics (brb, need to go to the basement) and here we are.I thought this thread was a place for us to pretend to be having conversations about marital relationships while we all wait for lindz to post another selfie?
Granted, we have been derailed for about 150 pages.
I have nothing to add other than this:Thanks, looks like I was wrong about that. I guess I'm lucky that I've only met women that were just as horny as me(or more).
Yeah J49 turned that thread into a complete hooker shit show and he is fairly relentless with the whore mongering in that thread.A fair point.
Honestly, Dumar, you're really bad at selling redpill ideology. You always go full redpill from the start and say shit only a (red) koolaid drinking person would buy. You then mix in these ridiculous absolutes like, "men are purely physical' which makes any reasonable idea you're trying to express difficult to separate from the tripe. You also overcomplicate what amounts to a pretty basic set of ideas.And so, deconstructing and eventually discarding the ideas modern society has fed us, that of the advice to apply rationality to human interpersonal relationships on the basis of gender equalism, we can arrive at a more correct view, an understanding more reflective of biomechanical and psychosocial reality as it applies to the nature of women. We're not attaching quality to this nature - it's neither good nor bad; it justis, the same way the nature of specific animals just are.
Whatisdepressing however, is that this view constructed from reality destroys love's idealism. There is no such thing called love outside of a pure ideological, constructed thing, and the construction society has provided has to be discarded, looking into the nature of women, if we are to be objective and understand things such as they are.
Women 'fall in love' with you based on your psychosocial behavior towards them and greater society, which is reflected in both those behaviors and your attitude. That's opportunism. It is conditional, and this behavior & attitude must be maintained, both in the LTR and a marriage. Men are purely physical: a wife just has to maintain her body, and our idealistic notions of love will take root and mostly stay put because of how men have regulated themselves throughout history, through notions of virtue, honor, respect, etc (even if those are too illusory, we conduct ourselves according to them). Women, on the other hand, have survived, that is, their genes nature has selected by being opportunistic to dominance, and that is expressed today by what we call confidence (again, even if it's illusory).
Or the tl;dr, as Rollo said:Men love idealistically. Women love opportunistically.
This is what redpill and Game is for, to dispell these illusory notions, put reality back into view and give some power back to guys in the dating market.
I think that pill is a different color than red.and pack a big penis.
What if I come in here and talk about it. My wife left me after 12 years of being my best friend, and lover. I had a great relationship. I looked forward to every day. We had children.For sure but Dumar coming in talking about how after being together for five years I need to be concerned about building attraction and carnal desire is fucking stupid. It reeks of reading a few blogs and seduction forums and having a girlfriend here and there for six months max. Which is more appropriate for the GWBYHT instead of here which shouldn't be concerned about picking up women.
See, this is another area where I vehemently disagree with Rollo. Do women have a higher propensity to love opportunistically? Yeah, perhaps, but let's not pretend like men wouldn't also do the same if presented the opportunity. We certainly tend to seek/have sex opportunistically. Men just tend to be offered that position a whole lot less frequently. No man among us wouldn't jump at the opportunity to be Oprah's house husband, let's be honest.Or the tl;dr, as Rollo said:Men love idealistically. Women love opportunistically.