something they literally cannot control
I assume he's talking about adhd and other diagnosed disorders when he says thatI'm not trying to be an asshole here, but how do you know that?
What makes it "something they literally cannot control" versus "something they have a serious issue with that discipline could help control" ?
I assume he's talking about adhd and other diagnosed disorders when he says that
Idk. Anyway there is tons of evidence that physical discipline (abuse, whatever) has far more negative effects on behavior than other forms in both animals and humansI assume so too, but what makes adhd something that you "literally cannot control" versus just something that they have more trouble controlling than other people?
Different strokes for different folks I guess , we will have to agree to disagree here. Just because the law allows it doesn't mean it's not abuse. We're talking about a country where electro-shock was legal at one point in time.It is not child abuse - its discipline. If I go off and beat them etc. then it is abuse. She got a bruise yesterday from running herself into a bench at the playground, more damage than any spanking either has ever gotten, how she didn't see the stupid bench- who knows
Control is the same as it is for adults, to be all SJW term- we all get triggered all day long, we enact self control and restraint. Are you saying that, at any level of issue or disorder that they cannot learn control? they are outside of understanding consequence and action/reaction? That there is and never will be an ability to have self control?
And the science, is about as science as fucking bill nye - if we go back before it was something of social scorn, there was science that said it could yield positive results - there is also a bunch of "living proof" that discipline actions that sometimes involve spanking is effective, just as much as not.
I never claimed that it was an end all answer - I specifically gave example I have seen where that method of discipline is just taken off the table completely in a fam that advocated it previously- if it does not work, fine. If the kid does not understand, or does not have the mental capacity to understand, I get it.
If truly we are just to say "oh something triggered them, and nothing could be done, they will never learn to restrain themselves, they never can comprehend that their actions are not good" fine, your right - just do not do anything, nothing will work, nothing will ever teach them to cope, analyze, problem solve in their mind an action or reaction cause.... nope.. but I tend to give these kids more chance than that, being a kid, having kids - kids nature is not to be tempered and tempering them is part of raising them up. So sorry that I feel most of these kids could learn and understand and develop beyond just saying fuckem let them do whatever.
And it was abuse it would be issued as such in our laws and statutes, its not- even after all these years of super science. Is there a line that too many bad parents cross? yes - but to me that does not dismiss or demonize the discipline before the line.
Both situations are kind of the same. The measures used to help them control their behavior are "discipline", just not hitting.I'm not trying to be an asshole here, but how do you know that?
What makes it "something they literally cannot control" versus "something they have a serious issue with that discipline could help control" ?
Have you tried physical abuse?Both situations are kind of the same. The measures used to help them control their behavior are "discipline", just not hitting.
Lack of impulse control is one of the key symptoms of ADHD and autism. You can see it in my daughter, she used to spend the majority of her day in trouble for shit she would just do and not even be able to really comprehend what she had done or explain why. Teaching impulse control to a kid like that is hard as fuck. But doable. I've had some success.
Idk. Anyway there is tons of evidence that physical discipline (abuse, whatever) has far more negative effects on behavior than other forms in both animals and humans
If my child tells me or my wife "fuck you" we've failed miserably to a point wjere they need to be sent to Afghanistan to be honor killed.I agree, but at some point, physical discipline is the last option. Lets say your 12 year old says fuck you dad, I'm not going to school. You say, you're going to school or I'm taking your ipad. He says fuck you, come take it from me bitch. You say... ? You say no playing PS4 because you didn't do your homework, I need you to go to timeout. He says, fuck your timeout, and fuck you. You do... ? At what point do you say, you're going to do what I say or I'm going to get the belt? Maybe you never have to do that, and I'm not saying you knock a kid out for spilling his milk. But his recognition of your authority is always grounded in the fact that he knows you can belt his ass at some point, right?
I mean, what are we talking about here? I think obviously if you are hitting your kid regularly in any way, you're fucking up. Physical discipline needs to be the last resort, the final straw in establishing authority. But if you take physical discipline off the table in every way, and just parrot the "its abuse" line, then when your kid is like, fuck you and your rules, I'm doing X, what do you do? Stand there like Bernie and take it?
If my child tells me or my wife "fuck you" we've failed miserably to a point wjere they need to be sent to Afghanistan to be honor killed.
Do you just have a problem with the word abuse or something?I agree, but at some point, physical discipline is the last option. Lets say your 12 year old says fuck you dad, I'm not going to school. You say, you're going to school or I'm taking your ipad. He says fuck you, come take it from me bitch. You say... ? You say no playing PS4 because you didn't do your homework, I need you to go to timeout. He says, fuck your timeout, and fuck you. You do... ? At what point do you say, you're going to do what I say or I'm going to get the belt? Maybe you never have to do that, and I'm not saying you knock a kid out for spilling his milk. But his recognition of your authority is always grounded in the fact that he knows you can belt his ass at some point, right?
I mean, what are we talking about here? I think obviously if you are hitting your kid regularly in any way, you're fucking up. Physical discipline needs to be the last resort, the final straw in establishing authority. But if you take physical discipline off the table in every way, and just parrot the "its abuse" line, then when your kid is like, fuck you and your rules, I'm doing X, what do you do? Stand there like Bernie and take it?
That's pretty extreme. I was a horrible teenager, HORRIBLE, and I never got in my dad's face like that.
No, my dad stopped that spanking shit well before I was a teenager. I just didn't have that kind of relationship with him, we fought but I wouldn't have done that.Why not? Were you afraid he would hit you if you did?
No, my dad stopped that spanking shit well before I was a teenager. I just didn't have that kind of relationship with him, we fought but I wouldn't have done that.