Pussification in America: Political Correctness is Gay

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Trollface_sl said:
His side of the story.Michael Ryan was awarded custody of the childandMichael Ryan was never called to testify against Nicole Ryan's false allegations.



Fuck you, S.C.C. Fucking disgrace.
Click to expand...
See, THIS is what was missing from that article, which is why I said they should have gone into it.
Having heard this, I agree that the Canadian legal system failed.
Hell, the media also failed.
Fails all around.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
I'm convinced Tanoomba is the first poster in history on FoH/RR that is a woman pretending to be man.
Click to expand...
You're not the first to suggest it. You're not the first to be wrong about it, either.
Why would it matter, though? Would my opinion be worth less if I was a female? Would it make it easier for me to be dismissed?
I'm a guy, but I could give two shits about stereotypical notions of "manliness", which is why I have no problem saying what I say.
I'm sorry if that disturbs you.

McCheese_sl said:
Is Tanoomba Aamina?
Click to expand...
I don't know who that is.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Tanoomba_sl said:
See, THIS is what was missing from that article, which is why I said they should have gone into it.
Having heard this, I agree that the Canadian legal system failed.
Hell, the media also failed.
Fails all around.
Click to expand...
But you didn't fail by jumping to conclusions and blindly supporting a woman who hired a hitman to have another human killed.

I bet you think Jodi Arias shouldn't he guilty because WHAT OTHER CHOICE DID SHE HAVE? Amirite.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
But you didn't fail by jumping to conclusions and blindly supporting a woman who hired a hitman to have another human killed.

I bet you think Jodi Arias shouldn't he guilty because WHAT OTHER CHOICE DID SHE HAVE? Amirite.
Click to expand...
I didn't blindly support her, I was given limited information and entertained the possibility that the legal system knew what it was doing.
I was given more information and saw that, in retrospect, it seems far more likely that the legal system did not know what it was doing.

We all form our impressions based on the information we are given. That's not a flaw unless we reject additional information because it contradicts our previous conclusion.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Tanoomba_sl said:
You're not the first to suggest it. You're not the first to be wrong about it, either.
Why would it matter, though? Would my opinion be worth less if I was a female? Would it make it easier for me to be dismissed?
I'm a guy, but I could give two shits about stereotypical notions of "manliness", which is why I have no problem saying what I say.
I'm sorry if that disturbs you.
Click to expand...
Maybe I said that because you seem to think women are horribly repressed in every facet of society and traits associated with males have done nothing but hinder the progress of society.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
Maybe I said that because you seem to think women are horribly repressed in every facet of society and traits associated with males have done nothing but hinder the progress of society.
Click to expand...
Oh, come on, I never said "horribly".
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
In your own mind you setup a situation where you thought it was okay for a woman to hire a hitman to kill her husband. You seem to be able to justify murder pretty quickly for a woman.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
In your own mind you setup a situation where you thought it was okay for a woman to hire a hitman to kill her husband. You seem to be able to justify murder pretty quickly for a woman.
Click to expand...
I didn't "set up" anything. I was presented with an article that omitted a lot of very important information. I even mentioned in my original response that knowing what happened between the woman and her husband was very important in understanding her motives and should have been mentioned. However, there was nothing in the article to suggest she was lying about her abuse, or that she didn't feel like her life was in danger. And it was the legal system itself that decided it was OK for her to hire a hitman, not me. I just gave them the benefit of the doubt, which was later shown to be an error in judgement.

So theoretically, yes, I could imagine a situation where a woman in fear for her life might be justified in hiring a hitman. I can also imagine a situation where a man could be justified in hiring a hitman. People pushed to the edge will do anything to ensure their survival, after all. The fact that it appears this woman was nowhere near the edge she claimed to have been pushed to should have been the focus of the entire article, instead of something that could only be brought to light in a fucking YouTube video.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Yes you did setup up hypothetical situations in your post and said it was justifiable to hire a hitman. Not go to the police, or any one of theany non-profits that help women in situations such as that. Nope kill that fucking MAN instead.
 
OneofOne

OneofOne

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,937
8,785
Tanoomba, I just wanted to compliment you on your juggling ability to simultaneously fence three morons and continue pushing their shit in. I don't personally have the stamina or will, but god bless those of you that do.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
Yes you did setup up hypothetical situations in your post and said it was justifiable to hire a hitman. Not go to the police, or any one of theany non-profits that help women in situations such as that. Nope kill that fucking MAN instead.
Click to expand...
The article implied the police couldn't or wouldn't help her.
I'm not saying "hitman" is a reasonable choice in any situation, but I can imagine someone being pushed to the point where they are physically and psychologically broken and feel they have no recourse if they hope to survive.
The courts were stupid to assume this was the case without any evidence showing it was so (without giving the husband a chance to speak, even). Until I was shown that part of the story I had no choice but to assume there had been evidence supporting Doucet's side of the story. In fact, it would have been preposterous for me to assume otherwise, as this is how our legal system is supposed to work. As it turns out, our legal system is sexist and terribly flawed. All I have ever done is come to the most logical conclusions the information at hand had led me to believe. Get over it.
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,009
138,751
So in other words you are as stupid and gullible in thinking as the courts where?
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
fanaskin_sl said:
So in other words you are as stupid and gullible in thinking as the courts where?
Click to expand...
What's the alternative? Assume every decision made by the courts is faulty and made without evidence?
Like I said repeatedly, the article left out a lot of crucial information.
Gullibility had nothing to do with it. I worked with the information I had.

With the razzing you're getting in the politics thread, though, I don't blame you for looking for someone to vent your frustration on.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Trollface_sl said:
symptoms of feminists: believe women's word over men.
Click to expand...
Sorry, I'm calling bullshit.
At the risk of repeating myself, that court decision is exactly what feminism is against.Exactly.
That you choose to use our flawed legal system as an example of what's wrong with feminism when feminism has nothing to do with it is pathetic.
 
JVIRUS

JVIRUS

Golden Knight of the Realm
430
170
Tanoomba_sl said:
As a teacher, I can't hang pornography in either my office or my classroom. My wife works at a bakery and can't put up pornography there either. My mom works in retail and doesn't put up pornography in her shop. My father actually does work in construction (tile work) but you'd be hard-pressed to find any porn anywhere near where he works. My brother's a busboy and... you get the idea.

Now, saying that construction workers/plumbers should be able to put up porn because historically it was considered acceptable isasking for special treatment, exactly what you claim to be against. Seriously, give me one good reason why these guys should have the "right" to put up porn where they work. You say that "hostile environment sexual harassment cannot be fucked with", but apparently it's totally OK as long as no girls are around. This is why I was wondering whether or not the transgendered individual had filed a complaint or not. I actually think the foreman referring to her as "fag" and "bitch" creates a much more hostile work environment than some posters, which is why this guy is not the hero of the story he's portrayed as being. These "concepts associated with stereotypical manliness" of which you speak have no relevance any moreexceptin pop culture, and that's not only OK, it's better for everyone,including men. Yes, things that were once considered acceptable no longer are. Blacks-only fountains, women being unable to vote, and smoking while pregnant were all once considered completely acceptable. Now they're not. Sometimes these changes piss some people off. Like I keep saying:

Get over it.
Click to expand...
Who is defending race specific toilets or wife beating? I'm talking about the pussification of America; Knee jerk reaction policies made by reptile brained pussies fucking up systems and cultural values supposedly for our benefit that frustrate if not outright harm us, and how having the balls to even wanna say something about this shit gets you labelled as behind the times.

Parents so afraid of being perceived as abusive that any discipline at all in public is simply abandoned. About book banning, incredible percentages of children having 'mental disorders', and laughably insulting policies like the No Child Left Behind act plaguing our schools. About TSA asking me to take my shoes off and X-ray my balls because there is a measly 1 in 10,408,947 chance something might happen. About hostile workplace environment laws worded so that virtually anything may be construed as abusive forcing work places to be excruciatingly bland. And yes even a poster of some tittie balls needing to be taken down because some nameless prude somewhere decides whats appropriateforme, for everyone.

I will concede to you that I cannot think of a reason or right to defend that poster. However I do believe that artistic censorship in the US is maddening, with our arms manufacturing and porn industries being what they are, who are we kidding?

A man doesn't need to be a child clubbing, woman hating, racist malcontent to think that child mood disorder diagnoses or racial hiring quotas are stupid and need to be examined. Drone like acceptance of offensively stupid policy is the only allowable stance all too often. That or immediate perception as a domestic terrorist.

You knob gobblers shitting on Tanoomba for playing devil's advocate or speaking his peace are pussies, too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.