Pussification in America: Political Correctness is Gay

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
he tried to justifyan indefensible crimeand raised hypothetical illustrations to defend that psychotic woman like a fucking retard that he is. Doesn't matter if he would admit that the court has failed. He is a problem, a symptom, a disease, and he doesn't see it. I can fucking guarantee you right now that if he was in that seat with other judges, he wouldn't have cared. You know why?He didn't take the fucking time to research anyways and raised bullshit points to justify her from her indefensible crime.He would've voted with other judges and say that the woman should be given the pardon. He is the pussy that we should be fucking rejecting. A pussy who is willingly allowing justification for such indefensible act. Court doesn't operate on, "MAYBE AND IF."It works on reasonable beyond fucking doubt.That hasn't even been established and yet he jumps to fucking hypothetical when there is no substantial grounds for it. Mangina Supreme at work.
 
OneofOne

OneofOne

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,937
8,785
The facts in this particular case may be such that the woman really should have gotten serious jail time, but that doesn't change that I can see perfectly legitimate reasons where hiring someone to kill your spouse is allowable. You call it indefensible, I call it pragmatic.
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
wutever bro. see you in court. i am happy to watch someone argue that murder is acceptable given the conditions. amusing as fuck.
 
Alex

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,720
7,539
Not even regular murder. We're talking about the penultimate of premeditated murder.
 
OneofOne

OneofOne

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,937
8,785
Really? You can't imagine a situation in which escape from your tormentor seems impossible, that the legal system is no help, or you believe your tormentor far too smart? It's sad that I can, I hope you never have to be in that position.
 
iannis

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,657
OneofOne_sl said:
Really? You can't imagine a situation in which escape from your tormentor seems impossible, that the legal system is no help, or you believe your tormentor far too smart? It's sad that I can, I hope you never have to be in that position.
Click to expand...
The thing about that is that every now and then you will have a battered woman murder her husband and "get away" with a greatly reduced sentence on account of being a battered woman. And I don't think I remember anyone claiming that's a great injustice. Imagine the rape-slaves in cleveland had stabbed the dudes in the eyes instead of being rescued. They might not have even been charged. And they might not should have been charged if that had happened.

But now going out and hiring a dude to do it for you is an entirely different thing. If you are mentally competent enough and have enough resources to get a 3rd party involved in that way then you are mentally competent enough and have enough resources to find a solution which does not require murder.

And it is yet a third different thing if some guy wandering past happens to notice a dude beating a woman to death and steps in and kills said dude.

These are three different things, while they share a situation it is not about the desperate situation itself. Very simply: If you have the leisure (and it is leisure) to hire a hitman then your situation was not desperate enough to warrant it.
 
Alex

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,720
7,539
Maybe you're just a sociopath OneofOne. There have to be at least a couple on these boards.
 
Big Phoenix

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,804
99,992
Iannis_sl said:
The thing about that is that every now and then you will have a battered woman murder her husband and "get away" with a greatly reduced sentence on account of being a battered woman. And I don't think I remember anyone claiming that's a great injustice. Imagine the rape-slaves in cleveland had stabbed the dudes in the eyes instead of being rescued. They might not have even been charged. And they might not should have been charged if that had happened.

But now going out and hiring a dude to do it for you is an entirely different thing. If you are mentally competent enough and have enough resources to get a 3rd party involved in that way then you are mentally competent enough and have enough resources to find a solution which does not require murder.

And it is yet a third different thing if some guy wandering past happens to notice a dude beating a woman to death and steps in and kills said dude.

These are three different things, while they share a situation it is not about the desperate situation itself. Very simply: If you have the leisure (and it is leisure) to hire a hitman then your situation was not desperate enough to warrant it.
Click to expand...
Stupid ass jurors in jodi arias trial didn't give her the death penalty because stupid fucks thought was a battered woman.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
JVIRUS_sl said:
Who is defending race specific toilets or wife beating? I'm talking about the pussification of America; Knee jerk reaction policies made by reptile brained pussies fucking up systems and cultural values supposedly for our benefit that frustrate if not outright harm us, and how having the balls to even wanna say something about this shit gets you labelled as behind the times.

Parents so afraid of being perceived as abusive that any discipline at all in public is simply abandoned. About book banning, incredible percentages of children having 'mental disorders', and laughably insulting policies like the No Child Left Behind act plaguing our schools. About TSA asking me to take my shoes off and X-ray my balls because there is a measly 1 in 10,408,947 chance something might happen. About hostile workplace environment laws worded so that virtually anything may be construed as abusive forcing work places to be excruciatingly bland. And yes even a poster of some tittie balls needing to be taken down because some nameless prude somewhere decides whats appropriateforme, for everyone.

I will concede to you that I cannot think of a reason or right to defend that poster. However I do believe that artistic censorship in the US is maddening, with our arms manufacturing and porn industries being what they are, who are we kidding?

A man doesn't need to be a child clubbing, woman hating, racist malcontent to think that child mood disorder diagnoses or racial hiring quotas are stupid and need to be examined. Drone like acceptance of offensively stupid policy is the only allowable stance all too often. That or immediate perception as a domestic terrorist.

You knob gobblers shitting on Tanoomba for playing devil's advocate or speaking his peace are pussies, too
Click to expand...
I actually agree with 90% of what you're saying. North America is being "pussified" and it definitely has some negative effects on society.
But the backlash to this "pussification", the overbearing "This is how things used to be and how they should be, goddamn it!" attitude is just as dangerous. We have to pick our battles and not just fight every change just because it's change.

Gender and sexuality is a ridiculously complex issue, one that many people are not remotely comfortable having serious discussions about (See: Every discussion about gender in this thread ever). There aren't even 2 genders any more, and a lot of people simply don't want to accept that, but they have no choice. It's also becoming less and less acceptable for workers in any field to display porn where others can see it, and we can argue about how compromising the "men's playground" makes things more difficult for people who have accepted this type of behavior for generations, but there are pretty good reasons why these particular changes are occurring and virtually no good reasons to defend this behavior. This isn't a compromising of values here. It's not that some "nameless prude" is making rules for everyone, it's that if we want to be a free society where any people are welcome in any professional field, we can't accept behavior that marginalizes people or makes them uncomfortable. Yeah, I guess it's kind of ironic that this is an example of a restriction being added in the name of "freedom", but that's the way freedom works sometimes. Businesses used to be able to reject black job applicants on the grounds of them being black. They can't do that anymore, and society as a whole has more freedom as a result.


Trollface_sl said:
wutever bro. see you in court. i am happy to watch someone argue that murder is acceptable given the conditions. amusing as fuck.
Click to expand...
Murder is already acceptable in many conditions.
- Self defense
- Punishment for a crime (death penalty)
- Soldiers at war
- Police facing dangerous criminals
etc.
We've already established that it's sometimes OK to kill. What's the big leap of faith here?
 
OneofOne

OneofOne

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,937
8,785
Iannis_sl said:
The thing about that is that every now and then you will have a battered woman murder her husband and "get away" with a greatly reduced sentence on account of being a battered woman. And I don't think I remember anyone claiming that's a great injustice. Imagine the rape-slaves in cleveland had stabbed the dudes in the eyes instead of being rescued. They might not have even been charged. And they might not should have been charged if that had happened.

But now going out and hiring a dude to do it for you is an entirely different thing. If you are mentally competent enough and have enough resources to get a 3rd party involved in that way then you are mentally competent enough and have enough resources to find a solution which does not require murder.

And it is yet a third different thing if some guy wandering past happens to notice a dude beating a woman to death and steps in and kills said dude.

These are three different things, while they share a situation it is not about the desperate situation itself. Very simply: If you have the leisure (and it is leisure) to hire a hitman then your situation was not desperate enough to warrant it.
Click to expand...
This entire defense is predicated on the idea the woman in question is wealthy or otherwise has access to lots of cash. If a woman hires a hit from a local junkie for a BJ, $20, and a carton of smokes, I don't see your argument having merit.
 
Eomer

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
OneofOne_sl said:
This entire defense is predicated on the idea the woman in question is wealthy or otherwise has access to lots of cash. If a woman hires a hit from a local junkie for a BJ, $20, and a carton of smokes, I don't see your argument having merit.
Click to expand...
Are we talking in generalities or the specific case that was being discussed before? That crazy cunt gave 20k to one dude who ran off with it, before she then gave another 20k to an undercover RCMP officer. Weeks apart, and big money. Chick was just flat out crazy and vindictive, not desperate to get away from an abusive husband (who at that point was living 100 miles away with a new woman).
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Alex_sl said:
Not even regular murder. We're talking about the penultimate of premeditated murder.
Click to expand...
straight up first degree murder. this is not even a self-defense or manslaughter. premeditated killing of an individual. complete joke that some faggots are defending the use of hitman. anything else is a conditional justification. the act alone should have put her in bar.

shit is gold though. wonder how this would've turned out if it was a man.
 
OneofOne

OneofOne

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,937
8,785
The amounts I read were $25k and $25k, but whatever. I said I can see circumstances where hiring a hit should not be prosecuted. In this case specifically, what I've seen so far leads me to believe she should be prosecuted. Haven't looked deeply into it however.
 
OneofOne

OneofOne

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,937
8,785
Trollface_sl said:
straight up first degree murder. this is not even a self-defense or manslaughter. premeditated killing of an individual. complete joke that some faggots are defending the use of hitman.

shit is gold though. wonder how this would've turned out if it was a man.
Click to expand...
No one is defending the use of a hitman in this case. That you can't keep up with the conversation is your issue, not ours.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
OneofOne_sl said:
No one is defending the use of a hitman in this case. That you can't keep up with the conversation is your issue, not ours.
Click to expand...
He's gotdeepgender and race-based issues. Maybe a black woman mocked his penis and he still hasn't gotten over it?
In any case, as I'm sure you've noticed, the grand majority of Trollface's posts involve shitting on other people in order to boost his own ego. It's how he gets his jollies and is fairly typical of people with low self-esteem.
Keeping up with the conversation would mean he would have to stop mocking some people, something he's apparently not very good at and has no intention of doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.