Pussification in America: Political Correctness is Gay

ZyyzYzzy_sl said:

That is ripe coming from you.

Click to expand...

Really? I've only got issues with racist, misogynist, homophobic bigots.

Again, you think committing premeditated murder via hiring a hitman is just when it is a woman in an abusive relationship.

ZyyzYzzy_sl said:

Again, you think committing premeditated murder via hiring a hitman is just when it is a woman in an abusive relationship.

Click to expand...

Been addressed ad nauseum. Get some new material.

Alex_sl said:

You're definition of what makes someone one of those things is pretty absurd. You probably think Louis CK is a racist, misogynist, homophobic bigot. I'm afraid you've fallen victim to American Pussification.

Click to expand...

How am I mis-defining people? I'd love to hear why you think "absurdity" is part of the equation.
And I happen to think Louis CK is hilarious.

Titan_atlas_sl said:

IE i'm a bigot but only against people who don't share my very specific set of rules for bigotry. The sooner people accept that we will always choose a side and dislike other people for being different the better. We are all on teams mostly based on arbitrary definitions of "who" we are. The pussification of America is really the belief that we can be non offensive and just to everyone, everytime, and restrictions to enforce this socialism society wide. It's bullshit and it's here to stay folks and douchebags like Tanoomba will continue to peddle it.

Click to expand...

Fucking. Wow.
Yes, I have a problem with racists, misogynists, and homophobes.
I have a problem with people who judge others and consider them inferior because of something as arbitrary as race, gender, or sexual orientation.
My problem is with arbitrary hate. There is nothing arbitrary about my problem with people who exhibit such hate.
Trying to defend hate and intolerance by saying "Well, ifyoudisagree thenyouare just being intolerant ofthem!" is fucking ridiculous.

If someone murders my parents, am I a bigot for having something against that person? Am I being intolerant? No, because we accept that it's wrong to fucking murder people. Guess what? it's also wrong to be a fucking racist, misogynist or homophobe. As responsible members of society, it's our fucking duty to discourage this unacceptable and disgusting behavior.

Now, if you want to talk about rights, everybody has the right to hate whoever they want. I wouldn't dream of taking that right away from anyone. But if you're going to hate people arbitrarily, you'd better be ready to face the consequences when people call you on being a cunt.

Trollface_sl said:

On a bright side, Canada is on the road to de-pussification.

Hate speech no longer part of Canada?s Human Rights Act

Click to expand...

This is actually good news. It has bothered me for years that free speech meant you were allowed to say whatever you wantexceptthings that could be considered hateful. Like I just said, we don't need to legally try to prevent assholism. Let the hate-mongers continue their hate-mongering. It makes it much easier to see who's part of the problem and who is pulling society in a negative direction. Let hate-mongers face the consequences they bring upon themselves instead of forcing some kind of legal consequence for spouting stupidity.

People are allowed to believe whatever they want to believe, even if they're wrong.ESPECIALLYif they're wrong.
Like Jesse Ventura said:

Jesse Ventura_sl said:

it isn't popular speech that must be protected, popular speech doesn't need protection, its unpopular speech that needs protection.

Click to expand...

You are a sexist, you just don't see yourself as one.

ZyyzYzzy_sl said:

You are a sexist, you just don't see yourself as one.

Click to expand...

*Sigh*
I'm almost positive I'm going to regret this...

How am I "a sexist"?

Alex_sl said:

Yeah, Tanoomba reeks of white male guilt. Like white men need to make up for the travesties that occurred in the past. That's not equality. Bill Burr has a great bit about this idea of some feminists only applying to the positives of what has always been considered white male privilege while keeping the stereotypical female positives to themselves. The double standards are maddening.

Click to expand...

I'm going to try not getting too into the topic of feminism, because I've tried that and it was a train wreck. The readership here is simply not ready to handle the topic with any kind of maturity whatsoever.
However, I will say that the double standards you mention are absolutely not part of feminism.
Here's an articlethat does a pretty good job explaining what feminism is really about.

chaos_sl said:

Bro, I'm not going to read a website called "jezebel."

Click to expand...

Then don't read it. But know that you're assumptions about feminism are based on your desire to mock feminism and not on what principles it's actually based on. If you prefer to wallow in ignorance because it makes it easier to laugh at people, that's your prerogative. You'd be in good company.