No one wins, everybody loses.(...)
Either way the floor is open to closing statements. No more than 500 words each. Verdict will be rendered on who wins tomorrow morning.
Those people are walking shake weights. You burn calories just looking at them.I declare Hodj the winner due to a_skeleton_03 not even attempting to find fraud at this scale. He could've at least tried to dig up some climate nonsense.
Let's move on to Parkinson's Spoons. Is this risk of shaky obese people too high to allow this technology to proliferate?
Yeah. depending on where the tremor is though. They don't help a lot for some people.I did not know this was a thing. Fucking cool. A spoon for people with Parkinson's.
All Products LiftwareNot exactly cheap, but pretty close considering the QOL improvement it could give.
I found Carson's running mateTime to change the thread title, in honor of Dr. Carson: "Just the way the Earth rotates on its axis, how far away it is from the sun. These are all very complex things. Gravity, where did it come from?"
Plus, shit needs to be charged...The fuck? My spoon has a battery. This is going to end up a sex toy.Yeah. depending on where the tremor is though. They don't help a lot for some people.
Still, the ones they do help, it's a good thing.
As I read that it is a slam dunk over the goal posts and hanging on it so it falls on the field right. QM doesn't play by local rules.i'm too dumb to tell -- does that mean bell was wrong, or bell was right?
Unfortunately you can't send information via entanglement. It would violate the no-broadcast and no-cloning theorems.At the risk of being very wrong, I'll summarize what I think I read. A long time ago this Bell guy said,"Quantum mechanics? GTFO with that BS." Then these guys were like, "No really, it's a thing. Here let me show you." Then they proceeded to send a message using electrons over a distance of 1.3 Km and went on to state that they could hypothetically do it at a greater distance. Oh and this has the potential to revolutionize a lot of shit.
Now if someone who actually knows what it says could correct me, I'd appreciate it.
And yet he spent several days arguing with me when I said that being gay was at least somewhat genetically based, and his reasoning for doing so was because he was arguing for total free will.Last time this was brought up to Furry, his excuse was that we all don't really have free will so our observations were themselves pre-determined.