No, his whole tangent about "light sabers are not swords" is a goal post shift. Originally I was just talking about Dooku probably being the most "realistic" fighting style if we compared things strictly to RL (It was an extension of an earlier conversation about the "realism" of the prequel fights), which is neck beard sure, but it was what the conversation was about. Dooku fighting like a fencer--
proves you can fightlike a fencer! He came in and said you don't block because of fragile steel; but that's
notthe primary reason. You don't do hard blocks because it's so easy for a light weapon to avoid them, just the angle of your wrist can drastically change the trajectory of a strike (And once more, Dooku's style proves this is possible with a Light saber). Then it got swapped to "Light Sabers aren't real weapons, here is this wookiepedia article explaining why they are wielded two handed!"
My argument is refuting
hisoriginalpremise, that in real life you don't block because of the steel with those weapons. Then I was doubling back
myoriginal point--if Dooku uses fencing, it breaks the theme of the saber fights. And I thought the original saber fights were
thematicallybetter, and more entertaining. (But the whole neck beard comment was just poking fun at Wookiepedia to try and side step the original argument about blocking
) The entire point was supposed to be that
ALLsaber fights were
sillycompared to RL; but at least the originals built a theme and contained it within the films, which let everyone suspend belief. Once the prequels came out, that theme got shattered and it made the fights seem worse...but within that mess, Dooku probably had the closest thing to what a "real" fighting style would look like if sabers could be wielded in such a way (IE like a one handed rapier)