Nothing to do with prostitution, just the fact that relationships cost resources regardless of whether they are strictly transactional or 'love'.Ah the classic mongoloid relationship=prostitution argument. It must have been over a year since the last one. Oh how enlightened they are. If only we could just see what they see
If that's the case just be careful her boyfriend or husband doesn't find out about you.If your woman is more than happy to fuck without ever spending a single dime on her, wouldnt that make her a fwb?
Tuco is way too cheap to ever do anything like that. He probably gave her a ring from a Cracker Jack box.In an idyllic world, everyone would call Tuco (it was Tuco right? I don't remember) an idiot for even buying a Moissanite ring because it's entirely impractical to spend money on vanity or tradition, right?
Then the argument is completely meaningless. I care about my siblings because they share my genes and enhance my survival, also. At the gene level, that's all that matters. With that information, I can be retarded and dismiss all feelings of kinship with them and extract no meaning from our relationship because it's just a biological process I'm engaging in. Don't care about your siblings!! It's just your genes fucking with your head! Or I can enjoy the relationship on a human level and extract meaning from it in spite of the fact that I only really do so because "genes," and suffer no I'll from my failure to, for some reason, act different from the natural inclination that has served my ancestors well for hundreds of generations.Relationships are at their basic level about an exchange of resources and the meeting of needs. Throughout history and in modern society, by and large, the masculine role is as provider. In cave times it was food and shelter and boring shit like that. In modern society money is what creates the ability to provide. Man provide money. Women sense opportunity for child to survive. Women spread legs. Man make sex explosion. They both laugh about how much they love having sex for the sake of sex alone.... while the woman narrows her gaze toward the camera because deep down her evolution has other plans.
There's a dynamic that exists in human relationships where I provide one thing, you reciprocate with another. This holds true for many things, especially sex. Some people simply the process like Johnny, because they've singled out one thing they want and a way to get it.
That doesn't mean durr durr relationships are all prostitution!!! And that doesn't mean the hyper-personalize counter-examples disprove everything EVAR. And it doesn't mean a bunch of fucking nerds in this thread who have in the past gone on and on about different means they're trying to employ to score some pussy or keep it weren't playing into that dynamic even if they were broke as shit and couldn't afford to just go to hookers directly!
I think it was either Tuco or Erronius right?Tuco is way too cheap to ever do anything like that. He probably gave her a ring from a Cracker Jack box.
Did you legally consent? Cause...you may have been raped.My girlfriend purchased all the ingredients to cook me some chorizo gravy & biscuits this morning and then blew me right there at the table.
Am I a whore?
I don't see anyone saying it's all the same shit but people arguing dumb shit like "so you're saying I literally married a prostitute?!?!"So when people say oh its all the same shit...