Hows that? The 2 cited papers prove its possible to control the acceleration remotely.Still haven't shown a shred of evidence you can remotely get a car up to 100mph. Keep working on it, you'll get there.
Hows that? The 2 cited papers prove its possible to control the acceleration remotely.Still haven't shown a shred of evidence you can remotely get a car up to 100mph. Keep working on it, you'll get there.
Great, then there will be evidence of an explosive device found.Yeah, they catch fire extremely rarely and they never explode.
Which is what happened to Hastings' car, witnesses reported a fireball explosion right after impact.
Now there's another theory to contribute to the paranoia: According to a prominent security analyst, technology exists that could've allowed someone to hack his car. Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post that what is known about the single-vehicle crash is "consistent with a car cyber attack."
Clarke said, "There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers" -- including the United States -- know how to remotely seize control of a car.
"What has been revealed as a result of some research at universities is that it's relatively easy to hack your way into the control system of a car, and to do such things as cause acceleration when the driver doesn't want acceleration, to throw on the brakes when the driver doesn't want the brakes on, to launch an air bag," Clarke told The Huffington Post. "You can do some really highly destructive things now, through hacking a car, and it's not that hard."
this thread is reaching critical levels of lumie...er...he was right...?
Show me.Hows that? The 2 cited papers prove its possible to control the acceleration remotely.
Oh yes, with government investigators working the crime scene - its almost a certainty that proof of tampering will be found!Great, then there will be evidence of an explosive device found.
Lots of trinitrotoluene.Do you have a full inventory of what he had in his back seat? trunk? passenger seat?
Yeah, I'm sure the entire LAPD and LAFD are in on it.Araysar_sl said:Oh yes, with government investigators working the crime scene - its almost a certainty that proof of tampering will be found!
I fucking did, did you? I read ways to disable brake control, turn off engines, interfere with combustion processes , effect steering, but nothing on ramping up the engines to 100 MPG, so find it if it exists.Read the papers, putz.
Your post thinly implied that reporters were being killed en masse for reporting shit about the government. Then you went on to link an article about reporters being killed in warzones. I don't think you know what a straw man is, I was just making fun of you.No chaos I was just giving evidence that reporters are killed all the time, not that Obama is killing them. Your tact today is to straw man everyone's post I see
alright, you sit in your car in the backseat at the edge of a cliff and we'll show you.Show me.
Sounds like you were looking for the wrong thing. I dont think they did anything to mess with fuel economy.I fucking did, did you? I read ways to disable brake control, turn off engines, interfere with combustion processes , effect steering, but nothing on ramping up the engines to 100 MPG, so find it if it exists.
OBD-II. The most signi?cant automotive interface is
the OBD-II port, federally mandated in the U.S., which
typically provides direct access to the automobile's
key CAN buses and can provide suf?cient access to
compromisethe full range of automotive systems[14]
Broadcast channels. Broadcast channels are channels that are not speci?cally directed towards a given
automobile but can be "tuned into" by receivers ondemand. In addition to being part of the external attack surface, long-range broadcast mediums can be
appealing as control channels (i.e., for triggering attacks) because they are dif?cult to attribute, can command multiple receivers at once, and do not require
attackers to obtain precise addressing for their victims
There. Fromhttp://www.autosec.org/pubs/cars-usenixsec2011.pdfThus far we have considered threats primarily at a
technical level. Previously, we have shown that gaining
access to a car's internal network provides suf?cient
means for compromisingall of its systems(including
lights, brakes, and engine)
Yeah, the LAPD has never covered up crimes or set people uphttp://intellihub.com/2013/06/25/raw...r-crash-video/
Pretty good video of the immediate aftermath. You can see at the very end that the engine ended up a hundred feet away from the car. Something tells me that you don't need an explosive device for a car to burst in to flames in that violent of a crash.
There was a witness there, but he didn't speak very good english. He seemed to say that the car was going so fast that when it hit a dip in the road it was bottoming out.
Yeah, I'm sure the entire LAPD and LAFD are in on it.
You guys are vastly overestimating the intelligence of people who work or do contract work for the government. For fucks sake, 2 weeks ago I had to show my PI how to convert word docs to PDFs.This is where conspiracy theories always fall apart. The same government that can't even perform basic functions is somehow also capable of carrying out massive, Orwellian conspiracies reaching from the highest levels of government administration to the low level workers. All of those people seem to have unified vision and purpose for the sake of this conspiracy, all maintain a code of silence, maintain astonishingly perfect discipline so that the only clues to a conspiracy are vague articles and unrelated parties putting out possibilities. It implies a childlike understanding of government and human sociology on the part of the believer.