Regardless he made a ton of money while streaming so unless he was being a complete fucking idiot with his money he should be set for the rest of his life anyway.
Story sounds very much like he did something morally wrong but not technically illegal. Something like grooming isn't technically illegal if it doesn't lead to anything further I believe(I googled it quickly but I'm not a lawyer), but it's also not something anyone wants to come to the surface, neither him or Twitch. Could be something else entirely but he sure didn't look like he was angry and looking at retaliation after the allegations surfaced or after he was fired, which if he felt he was wronged would be the case. It's not like he's a paragon of moral to start with, guy cheated on his wife as soon as he got some celebrity pussy(twice I think? forgot if it was just once or twice).
Even cheating on his wife was all one sided admission from him wasn't it? The "Other Girl" never came forward, it was all just people assuming.
Even when people "shot his house" his reaction seemed more, "How can I use this" than genuine outrage. Also, no one was ever charged, he lives / lived in a million dollar gated community, you telling me that they had NO footage of a random car / people walking around his community? That shit would be all over the news with the level of "games cause violence" hysteria that the media has for everything, especially shooter games.
---
I'm not gunna say none of this is real but it all seemed very theatrical.
He and Asmongold are both "Smart" marketing people. They understand how to pivot news and emotions into real dollars but the "characters" they play some to a hard stop when shit becomes real and levying charges of pedophilia at someone are some pretty real charges.
His reaction + none of the people levying the charges DIRECTLY at him, makes it sound like the people just want some lime-light and they are toeing a line that they know he can't say anything about. Now that he has "personal damages" associated with their words...It'll be entertaining at least LOL.
---
EDIT:
Adding to this, the courts take protection of a minor VERY seriously.
Anyone trying to sell the "They didn't do anything because they were trying to protect a minor"
IF a minor was involved is out of their mind. I would say that in most cases the minor / the minor's family is appointed a case worker / advocate for their safety. In all court documents they are referred to as "John Doe" or "Jane Doe" and if more than one minor is involved they just add A-B-C as needed. The only time it is plainly obvious who the Doe is in a case like this is when it's a child that reports on a family-member. The public will never see the testimony of the child, they will never see the child, they will never see the child's name.
The most deplorable case I saw like this was when a Step-X generationally molested some kids up to about 11 or 12 years old before switching to the next sibling. The courts listed all siblings as Doe A - B - C even though C was over 18 at the time of the case and all of the siblings were known to the defendant.
