Eating fish contaminated by Fukushima is probably ok

T

TJ Lazer_sl

shitlord
382
0
It's peculiar how most of these Fukushima panic stories come from the crazed super far right wing paranoid websites. Very peculiar indeed.
 
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,087
23,423
Radiation isn't even bad for you in these amounts. Especially for the half of you that never see the god damn sun.
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
79,821
159,031
handy guide for anyone confused about radiation terminology

RadiationGuide1-600x348.jpg
 
Lejina

Lejina

(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
<Bronze Donator>
4,663
12,139
I don't know which gives me the biggest headache: labeling hydrovolcanic explosions as nuclear explosions or claiming the tremors have been caused by fuel melting its way 9.9 km deep.

God forbid the earth just shake all on its own all the time overthere.
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
79,821
159,031
my article is written by a Physical Oceanographer at the Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean at the University of Washington.

yours by some guy who took a sea cruise on a yacht and "didnt see a lot of life"
 
tad10

tad10

Elisha Dushku
5,531
594
Araysar_sl said:
my article is written by a Physical Oceanographer at the Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean at the University of Washington.

yours by some guy who took a sea cruise on a yacht and "didnt see a lot of life"
Click to expand...
Because taking two data points: One cruise - "lots of shit" Second cruise ten years later "almost zero shit" - isn't a valid method of data collection? Whereas sitting on your ass and writing an article in Seattle based on 2011 and 2012 data is totally valid for 2014?
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
79,821
159,031
a guy took 2 sea cruises and saw less shit on the second one. this makes anecdotal evidence look like hardcore scientific proof

her article is buttressed by plenty of studies and statistics, all cited. im sure she visits the oceans plenty as is mentioned in her biography.



do not be upset, taddeus.
 
drtyrm

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
Tad, if you are this far off base about the death of the Pacific ocean, imagine how wrong you are going to be about McQuaid's new MMO.
 
Sebudai

Sebudai

Ssraeszha Raider
12,022
22,504
I hope you keep getting duped into being afraid of everything so we can continue having these hilarious threads.
 
tad10

tad10

Elisha Dushku
5,531
594
Sebudai_sl said:
I hope you keep getting duped into being afraid of everything so we can continue having these hilarious threads.
Click to expand...
Well, Yellowstone going to explode pretty soon... I'll start that one next year. Or a mod could rename this the Doomsday thread instead of having multiple threads.

rrr_img_55876.jpg
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
79,821
159,031
Give us a timeline on the Yellowstone explosion, Lumie...... I mean, Tad.
 
tad10

tad10

Elisha Dushku
5,531
594
Erronius_sl said:
I don't even know where to start, lol
Click to expand...
Fukushima and Solar Flares are much higher on the concern scale - though Yellowstone could have a small scale eruption anytime, super eruption probably not happening for a couple thousand years, but you never know. I wouldn't buy a house in Colorado.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.