You mad?After I stopped laughing...........You don't really believe this do you?
Where do you come up with this ? Journalism back in the 1800's better then now? Some of the stuff you spout I think you were born a hundred or so years late, you hate progress like no other. If you go back take Troll with you as well.no, the media was better back when it wasn't a infotainment centralized corporate conglomerate for profit.
the shit they used to say in the 1800's was more sensational than now.
seriously the activists in the 60's would have literally killed for tools like the internet but we are so passive and trained at our chattel role as "happiness machines" we literally lay around in apathy and bacon.
and most of that time in the modern era was spent imprinting positive images of state power via propaganda techniques learned in places like the creel commision, if anything it's progressively masked the incompetence, marginalized and demoralized the population , the internet has kinda chipped away at that at least.1800s sure were but only around 10-20% of people read papers back then (largely because of literacy), modern media touches near 100% of people that have any interest. Not to mention frequency counts for something as well as distance of coverage.
Some of the most widely circulated early political writings was the Anti-Federalist Papers - so I'd really posit that to be false - there's always been a pushback from too much dependence prevalent in the media, that was turned around harshly by the Depression however - but that's more to do with the mentality of the nation because of the Depression not because of the media changing at that point. Only really big eras for change in media came with TV news and then 24H News + the Internet (which came so close to each other they're pretty much the same effect on the consciousness).and most of that time was spent imprinting positive images of state power, if anything it's progressively masked the incompetence, marginalized and demoralized the population, the internet has kinda chipped away at that at least.
see but here is where you pointed out that most people couldn't read and it wasn't as widely circulated so it wasn't having the same daily impact on everyone like a television does.Some of the most widely circulated early political writings was the Anti-Federalist Papers - so I'd really posit that to be false
Nope. Are you so blind you believe the shit the government is telling you? If the Obamacare web site has signed up 7 million people in less than a month, I have seafront property to sell you in Arizona. CHEAP!You mad?
Let me guess, for 500 dollars?Nope. Are you so blind you believe the shit the government is telling you? If the Obamacare web site has signed up 7 million people in less than a month, I have seafront property to sell you in Arizona. CHEAP!
You seem pretty confident, bro. Would you say you're more or less confident about this than you were about that comical Unskewed Polls debacle?Nope. Are you so blind you believe the shit the government is telling you? If the Obamacare web site has signed up 7 million people in less than a month, I have seafront property to sell you in Arizona. CHEAP!
Enrollment began in November. That's 7million people in 5 months.If the Obamacare web site has signed up 7 million people in less than a month, I have seafront property to sell you in Arizona. CHEAP!
Bah you ruined it! I was hoping he could figure out the math on his own.Enrollment began in November. That's 7million people in 5 months.
Carney: If We Were 'Cooking The Books' On Obamacare, Wouldn't We Have Done It Sooner?Nope. Are you so blind you believe the shit the government is telling you? If the Obamacare web site has signed up 7 million people in less than a month, I have seafront property to sell you in Arizona. CHEAP!