You believe wrong in this expansion state which I've seen quoted in examples already.I believe you can pre qualify in expansion states.
what do you make of this then?You believe wrong in this expansion state which I've seen quoted in examples already.
So why this early surge in Medicaid enrollment? Salo and others can't say for sure, but they have some theories.
1) Medicaid outreach was already underway. Well before Oct. 1, officials and advocates in the states that had opted to run their own exchanges-which also are all states that have opted into the ACA's Medicaid expansion-planned ambitious efforts to get millions of existing and newly eligible residents into the public program.
Writing at Modern Healthcare, Steven Ross Johnson reports that Washington state officials credit an awareness campaign, which began last month with TV ads and 3,000 community-based volunteers, for helping boost early Medicaid enrollment.
2) Certain states were well-positioned to rapidly sign-up residents. Minnesota and Washington not only have a history of successfully expanding public coverage-they're also "Goldilocks states," according to Kip Piper, a former state Medicaid official and White House budget officer.
"Not too big, not too small," Piper said. "So [they're] big enough to have the capabilities and staff but not so large as to be overwhelmed" by a rush of new Medicaid applicants and quickly enroll them.
3) There's little burden on applicants.States that took Medicaid can auto-enroll patients in the program, noted Robert Laszewski, an industry analyst and former executive at a health insurer.
For private plans, "it's a tougher sale because people will still have hard dollar premiums and deductibles and co-pays. Selling [health coverage] for free will get you a lot more buyers than selling it for a price," Laszewski added.
How big is your finger that 40 stitches are needed/can fit?wall street journal is reporting that as of nov 3 only 50 thousand people have signed up for the ACA coverage.
personally if i was single in my early 20's. i'd just take my chance and pay the penalty and save myself several hundred dollars a year.
for the record from the time i was 18 through 30 i needed to go to the emergency room once- i sliced my finger with a utility knife and needed 40 stitches. other than that no trips to the docs.
from 31-40 no trips to the doc- not even for checkups-even though i have HMOBLue. i just recently started doing the annual physical- i started when i was 44-still think it's a waste of time since they have never found anything wrong with me- blood sugar normal, chorestoral(spelling) normal- etc. the only thing my doc complains about is my vitamin D level is really low(supposed to be 30 and so far for the past 4 years it's been 10). she prescribes me a D supplement then a new blood test after 3 months- and it is "normal" then 8 months later it is back at 10.
so if i am pretty normal, why WOULD i buy health insurance if i could save several hundred dollars a year otherwise.
Hmm I'm not sure I agree. Obviously it's pretty fucking rare to have something terrible happen to you, but depending on your income you're looking at like $300-$1000 a year for a decent plan. That's not bad, and the plus side is if you do get cancer at an early age, or hit by a car you won't be totally fucked.wall street journal is reporting that as of nov 3 only 50 thousand people have signed up for the ACA coverage.
personally if i was single in my early 20's. i'd just take my chance and pay the penalty and save myself several hundred dollars a year.
for the record from the time i was 18 through 30 i needed to go to the emergency room once- i sliced my finger with a utility knife and needed 40 stitches. other than that no trips to the docs.
from 31-40 no trips to the doc- not even for checkups-even though i have HMOBLue. i just recently started doing the annual physical- i started when i was 44-still think it's a waste of time since they have never found anything wrong with me- blood sugar normal, chorestoral(spelling) normal- etc. the only thing my doc complains about is my vitamin D level is really low(supposed to be 30 and so far for the past 4 years it's been 10). she prescribes me a D supplement then a new blood test after 3 months- and it is "normal" then 8 months later it is back at 10.
so if i am pretty normal, why WOULD i buy health insurance if i could save several hundred dollars a year otherwise.