Their delusions are really out of controlBut since the ACA is doomed to fail at this point
With that kind of foresight you should be playing the lotto.But since the ACA is doomed to fail at this point the things you say are so good don't actually happen, except temporarily, and meaninglessly. To fix something it has to work in the long term. ObamaCare does not work and is a failure. So none of the things you claim it solves actually will work. When the real costs become public next year it is doomed to extinction, then all of your supposed benefits will be history.
The only thing Obama cares about now is getting through the 2014 elections. And he will lie, steal and use morons like you to that.
But it is possible to do the things ObamaCare promised. Just not with the law that is on the books now.
ObamaCare is doomed to die. So yes.So you are trying to tell me that people with pre-existing conditions are going to be excluded from healthcare insurance in the future?
Exactly. Most everything is speculation at this point. Yes, people are losing insurance, but that is what people are focusing on instead of those people seeing what is available and getting new insurance.This.
I will debate the finer points of it and compare it to before but the bottom line is we don't know what is goint to happen. I am not a fan of some of it and I think it's too simplistic with it's mandatory EHB's with zero wiggle room but who knows maybe it won't affect anyone negatively.
looks like its doing great to me. why so upset?ObamaCare is doomed to die. So yes.
It is possible to help those people but not under the banner of ObamaCare. That law is impossible to fix.
Please explain why a law is going to fail and cease to exist and impossible to fix, are you trying to say things in the ACA are incapable of being amended?ObamaCare is doomed to die. So yes.
It is possible to help those people but not under the banner of ObamaCare. That law is impossible to fix.
Sometimes, that is what happens in life. Our first tries fail more than not.We must go backwards to go forwards!
Stick to the insults, this is why we want you to explain yourself because every time you actually do, you expose exactly how fucking retarded and shallow your arguments are.ObamaCare is doomed to die. So yes.
It is possible to help those people but not under the banner of ObamaCare. That law is impossible to fix.
When you fuck over a minority to the benefit of your favorite constituents it is always wrong and against everything this country stands for. Slavery would still be in force if your mindset was acceptable.Yes, people are losing insurance, but... etc
LOLWhen you fuck over a minority to the benefit of your favorite constituents it is always wrong and against everything this country stands for. Slavery would still be in force if your mindset was acceptable.
On the individual market They would price woman's insurance more for the extra services used, "gender rating".There was no such thing as you imply - individually bought policies were bundled after sale intoa joint risk pool.
Its a hugely flawed article because it presumes all visits are equally costly. Its as relevant to anything as poor people having basic appliances as a result.If a guy buy a health insurance right now, is he covered for maternity care?
Forget your heart disease example. Do you want to talk about overall cost of health care?
Women Should Pay More for Health Care | TIME.com
Unemployment complaints after the 15th Amendment passed had similar doomcrying... Wonder how that turned out... Or how The New Deal with its doomcrying turned out... Or Medicare... Ad nauseum...ObamaCare is doomed to die. So yes.
It is possible to help those people but not under the banner of ObamaCare. That law is impossible to fix.
Reading comprehension fail.Its a hugely flawed article because it presumes all visits are equally costly. Its as relevant to anything as poor people having basic appliances as a result.
please refer to the cost by age group as well. "Parkinson" have a chance of affecting both genders, so does heart disease.No its not - the handful of expensive women's care are dwarfed by men's health issues. Parkinson's and heart disease being the two biggest. I already covered that, which they skip over comparing. The only factual thing they do that isn't counterbalanced is go to the doc more often.
But they also have less costly visits on average.
I doubt they are getting ovarian cancer either, but something tells me unless your hanging out with fedor the women aren't getting testicular cancer.please refer to the cost by age group as well. "Parkinson" have a chance of affecting both genders, so does heart disease.
there is zero chance of maternity care affecting single men whatsoever.