I'm not the only one that possesses this. Plenty of men in this thread have demonstrated that they understand and comprehend the innate nature of women.Why do you feel you are the only one that has a true grasp on this reality?
Again, where have I said that they are negative? You're interpreting them as such. The how/why of women that I'm breaking down isn't a positive or a negative. It simplyis. You're interpreting it as a negative because you have an image/interest to protect and a mystique to preserve. Women are rewarded and reinforced by society for being mysterious and seemingly irrational. In fact, if done right, it's precisely that "mystery" which makes women both desirable and intolerably frustrating. However, to pull it off they must be(or seem to be)unknowable, and encourage men to believe so. Why do you think women love gossip so much? There's power in secrets for women(and men, at times. We just tend to seek them out less frequently). When a woman retorts to an observation of female behavior that betrays their intent, the standard misdirection is always drenched in the unknowable, unpredictably volatile, mystique. I'll point out where you did this...Why is your negative experiences with women the reality, not the positive experiences other men are claiming?
You see? Right there.. "We're all different!" - "None of that describes me!" - "You can't generalize us all!". The closer you get to the truth, the louder women screech. Which is evident by how much offense you seem to be taking to this entire debate.Women are all different, just like men are. When you make hostile generalizations it just sounds silly to me because for me personally, none of what you are saying fits the wayIthink or feel.
Again, you're assuming that I believe women have malicious intent in all things. Nowhere have I said that. However, as I've pointed out, there's areasonwhy you're attempting to distance yourself from certain observations.I don't know, I just don't live in a world where absolutely everyone is malicious and out to fuck over everyone else.
Because she didnt.The idea that someone as pretty as this girl got through high school un-KISSed by a guy
It's not desirable for me. I want a woman at least close to my sexual experience. I don't have time to convince a girl it's completely normal to give me head right after anal or getting choked can be fun. These aren't in the virgin skill-tree.Also why exactly is a woman being a virgin okay or even desirable? I dont see any angle were that doesnt raise some big red flags.
You'd believe it if you had a conversation with my mother-in-law. She -almost- ran me off too.Because she didnt.
I'm 100% with you on that. Well, I was, or still am, fuck I don't know.It's not desirable for me. I want a woman at least close to my sexual experience. I don't have time to convince a girl it's completely normal to give me head right after anal or getting choked can be fun. These aren't in the virgin skill-tree.
See the above postYou'd believe it if you had a conversation with my mother-in-law. She -almost- ran me off too.
I'm not saying that it's a common thing, but it certainly is not impossible to find a 19 yr old virgin. I found one when she was 19, and married her by the time she was 25. The virginity thing didn't even freak me out since those weren't even that uncommon at Lipscomb, but it was the fact she hadn't even been kissed yet. It wasn't a lack of people hitting on her, it was her choice. In most cases they don't loose anything, they choose to fuck someone. =PBecause she wasnt a virgin. Its like literally impossible for a woman to go past her early 20s without losing it. I mean at some point in time 1 out of the tens of millions of guys who hit on them on a daily basis is going to do something right to make it happen.
See the above post
I went to a university that had an abysmal female to male ratio (1:5 women to men). We had an old saying. Women at Clarkson are like parking spots. They're all handicapped or taken.i feel like every women i met online are either fucking nuts or taken (or both).